Re: The online database dilema?

The Harrison Family Discussion List


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The online database dilema?




In a message dated 3/30/98 12:32:53 PM, [email protected] wrote:

<<Recently I have seen some discussion about why you should not upload your

"less than perfect" genealogy data to the internet.  As a result, I have

just taken my database offline temporarily while I mull this over.  I was a

COMPLETE novice when I started collecting genealogy data about 8 years

ago... I didn't even know enough to write down the sources of my info for

the first year! (Of course when I started this it was just for myself and I

never imagined that anyone else would see it.)  My present database contains

over 12,000 persons, not counting the royalty.  I have worked almost daily

for the last 4 years going back over each of my direct lines trying to find

and record more info and better sources.  But I have included info on

siblings and their families and collateral lines which I have not, for the

most part, tried to verify.  I have not yet even had time, access to

resources, or money to gather all the primary sources that I expect are

available for every one of my direct ancestors.  I do/did have a notice

quite prominently on the homepage of my database warning to copy the data at

your own risk because it was not all verified by me.  But now I am wondering

if that is enough.  Should I not upload ANY genealogical info that has not

been verified by me with a primary source at best or secondary source at

least?  I hate to have someone copy something from my data without them

checking it further, but I will also miss out on the MANY people who have

seen my data and written to give me more info or correct my errors or point

me to other resources.  I'm sure not everyone who has a less than perfect

database is going to remove theirs from the web.  But I don't want to have

mine up there just because "everyone else is doing it"!  Does anyone care to

discuss the pros and cons of this issue?



Linda Cassidy Lewis

[email protected]

>>

Hello Linda,

If you indicate in some way that the information is questionable such as
stating " Robert Jones was probably the husband of Jane Smith, that leaves it
to the researcher to make the choice.  But any good researcher will use what
they get on the internet as a clue and will gather the documentation to prove
it them selves.

John Fox 
WinstonSalem , NC




The Harrison Genealogy Repository http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~harrisonrep

Back to Becky Bonner\'s Harrison Home Page
© 1996 Josephine Bass and Becky Bonner. All rights reserved.
ListMail Owner Becky Bass Bonner: [email protected]