In planning your time at a courthouse, it helps to know ahead of time what kind of indexes you're going to work with. Information on this page will tell you what to expect.
The earliest index volumes, from before 1890 or so, are often actually in the same book as the records themselves. The "records" in these oldest books are not the original records, but registrations of births, marriages, and deaths. The indexes for these types of books will typically be the first bunch of pages at the front of the book. There will be a column of names, possibly two columns if it's a book of marriage records, then a column of dates, and finally a column of numbers which will refer to a page number in the same book. On each page you'll find a number of records with columns of data displayed across the page. It's not a problem to find the right record once you've got the page. The index pages in these books are always handwritten and usually hard to read, but luckily there are never many of these books in a given county.
In many counties, because of the difficulty of reading the earliest indexes, the index information from the first one or two books was rewritten along with the index for the subsequent volume of records in a more legible fashion. Check to see if this is the case with the earliest indexes before you scan the index at the front of the record book and then find out it would have been much easier to scan it as part of the later index that was created. Assume the clerks will not tell you which index you should look at. Many of them don't use the earliest indexes much themselves and so usually don't know precisely what indexes are there for the early records.
Also because of the difficulty of reading the earliest indexes, volunteers have gone into some counties and typed up the index information for at least the early volumes and printed it in fully alphabetized indexes for people to use right there at the courthouse. When that's available, it saves a lot of time. I've indicated below at which counties you'll find this. Sometimes the clerks will tell you about these helpful typed indexes, sometimes not. Be sure to look around where the indexes are to see if there are any of these alphabetical typed indexes. They're usually on regular 8 1/2" x 11" paper in some kind of binder.
Indexes from 1890 or so on up to the present are usually handwritten and normally pretty legible. The style of writing may be unusual, but the writing is neater and more regular than most of us could manage. Most counties began to type the indexes at some point, and at some the clerks even went back and retyped old index books into new ones. The typed index books are faster to scan for names than the handwritten ones, but the difference is not extreme when the handwritten indexes are as neatly done as one usually finds.
Marriage indexes deserve a little extra explanation. There were five ways in which marriages were recorded in index volumes.
No matter what the format of the entries in an index book or what kind of vital records you're talking about, the entries are always first grouped by the first one or two letters of the last name, and within that subgroup of records are entered in order by the date at which they were received at the county office. In Dane County, Wisconsin and a few other counties, the most common names in the county are given index pages of their own. In Milwaukee County, Wisconsin and a couple of other counties, the names are grouped by the initial letter of the last name and then further subdivided by the first vowel in the last name. But within the name group, the entries are orded by date of receipt at the office.
One county in Wisconsin has every index entry on a tiny strip of paper, and all the strips are inserted in alphabetical order into a revolving set of vertical pages from which the entries can be viewed. This is not very convenient mechanically, but anything that's fully alphabetical is a big improvement over names grouped only by first initial.
Marquette County, Wisconsin, has an unusual index system. Each of the dozens of books of records has its own index in the front of the book of records. That makes scanning the indexes inconvenient, but not tremendously more time-consuming than looking at normal index books. If you know the year of the record, there is one book per year so searching the index and getting the record is fast.
A few counties list all the records of a given type for a certain year and a single initial letter of the last name on a short piece of paper until the paper is full, then continue listing on the back and onto a second piece of paper if there were too many records that year to fit on one piece. Then all the small pieces of paper are put into a ringed binder. It's easy to find the records for a given year, but quite tedious to scan these indexes for all occurrences of a surname. The most time-consuming index of this type was in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin.
There are several counties, primarily in northern Wisconsin and Michigan, which type every entry on an index card, and then you use an index card file instead of a book to find entries. The advantage of this method is you never have to scan over names you don't care about - the cards are in alphabetical order and you just go directly to the name you're interested in. The disadvantage is that it's less convenient to check for entries with variant spellings. Also, if you have to leave the cards in the card file it's a little hard to copy the information to a separate piece of paper. But it works.
The ideal index is one that's fully alphabetized, and a few counties have done this, but mostly it's only the counties with small populations that have all the indexes alphabetized.
The only indexes that are decidedly inadequate for any serious genealogical research are those in counties which have vital records which do not appear in any index. Next to those, the counties with no bride's indexes (index books showing marriages somehow grouped according to the bride's last name) are by far the most time-consuming to do research in. One can do research there for some tasks; other tasks - particularly those that involve looking for marriages of a number of women with different surnames - become impractical unless you live in the county.
The standard situation you'll usually encounter in counties in Wisconsin and northern Michigan is characterized by:
In counties with this standard situation, if you are performing the task of scanning all the indexes for a particular surname and can scan quickly, you can assume it will take you on average about 1.5 hours to go through all the indexes once. From there, the amount of time it takes you will depend on how many records you found to look up and if you need to go back to the indexes multiple times for different people. Notable exceptions to that time estimate are Milwaukee County, Dane County, Winnebago County, and Brown County, Wisconsin, which all have good "standard situation" or better indexes but where the population is so large that it takes several hours to go through all the indexes just because there are so many volumes.
In other counties that don't have the standard index situation, it will take you longer - about 2 hours longer, usually - to search the indexes if there are no brides' indexes, and only about 30 minutes or less total to search if the indexes are fully alphabetized. In the list of counties with their index book situations below, I have noted only the counties whose situation diverges from the "standard" one outlined above. If a county does not appear in the list, assume you'll find the standard index situation if you go there.
If you live in a county with poor indexes, you or your local genealogical society can do a lot for genealogists everywhere - including yourself, of course! - by taking the initiative to arrange to have volunteers create fully alphabetized indexes for your county. County officials will probably be glad to co-operate, especially if you consult them on how to verify your work and do what they suggest, so that they know the indexes will be reliable enough for them to use. The most problematic indexes are those in which brides' names are not listed, where there are some records that are unindexed, or where indexes are especially poorly organized. Those situations occur in these counties:
Alger Co., MI
Bayfield Co., WI
Douglas Co., WI
Iron Co., MI
Outagamie Co., WI
Polk Co., WI
Rusk Co, WI
Beyond the egregious problems encountered in the counties above, searching any index for brides' names when there is no brides' index is error-prone and very tedious. The following counties are desperately in need of someone to volunteer to create brides' indexes for at least certain time periods where there is none:
Door Co., WI
Eau Claire Co., WI
Iron Co., WI
Jefferson Co., WI
Pierce Co., WI
Portage Co., WI
Richland Co., WI
Saint Croix Co., WI
Waupaca Co., WI
Winnebago Co., WI
Wood Co., WI
With bride's indexes work goes much faster; but with fully alphabetized indexes for any time period or any vital record type, the amount of time a person has to spend searching indexes goes down nearly ten-fold for that time period! There are a number of counties with some sort of alphabetized index, at least for some records. If you see an opportunity to improve the situation in your county, do your part to help everybody out!
Wisconsin and Upper Michigan counties not appearing in this list have standard indexes.
Alger Co., MI | Index cards, some illegible; no brides search after 1950 |
Barron Co., WI | Fully alphabetized indexes |
Bayfield Co., WI | Birth index 1953-1995 is closed to the public, but clerks will search for a surname for you |
Brown Co., WI | Births computerized 1945-1978; b,m,d computerized from 2002 on |
Calumet Co., WI | Marriages and Deaths fully computerized; Births have alphabetical index |
Columbia Co., WI | Some indexes computerized |
Dodge Co., WI | Fully alphabetized: births 1949-present, marriages 1923-present, deaths 1981-present |
Door Co., WI | Some fully alphabetized indexes; no brides' index after 1927 |
Douglas Co., WI | No brides' index until 1995; oldest marriage and death books inaccessible |
Eau Claire Co., WI | No brides' indexes and large population makes for a long search |
Florence Co., WI | No brides' index, but small population so still fast |
Fond du Lac Co., WI | Marriages alpha 1844-1879 and 1984-present; Deaths alpha 1853-1889 and 1984-present; Births alpha 1941-present |
Forest Co., WI | Fully alphabetized births and deaths |
Gogebic Co., MI | Fully alphabetized indexes |
Grant Co., WI | Nearly completely alphabetized indexes |
Iowa Co., WI | Fully alphabetized indexes |
Iron Co., Michigan | Brides not listed in the marriage index at all for any time period |
Iron Co., Wisconsin | No brides' index; alphabetical index for births and deaths. |
Jackson Co., WI | Fully alphabetized indexes for births to 1907, deaths 1876-1947, marriages 1854-1946 |
Jefferson Co., WI | No brides' index before 1892 or from 1907-1973 |
Kewaunee Co., WI | Births alphabetized up to 1900; Marriages alphabetized 1850-present |
La Crosse Co., WI | No brides' index before 1892 or after 1965. |
Lafayette Co., WI | Fully alphabetized indexes for everything |
Manitowoc Co., WI | Birth index basically alphabetized through 1985 |
Monroe Co., WI | Alphabetical indexes for some records |
Outagamie Co., WI | Deaths computerized 1997-present; births 1957-present; brides not in index 1852-1867; no brides' index 1868-1894 |
Ozaukee Co., WI | Marriage index computerized; Deaths have cards only; Births check cards and computer |
Pepin Co., WI | Indexes mostly alphabetized. Low population, very quick search |
Pierce Co., WI | No brides' index |
Polk Co., WI | No brides' index; index books 1 and 2 extremely difficult to search |
Portage Co., WI | No brides' index |
Racine Co., WI | Computerized indexes from 1993 to present. |
Richland Co., WI | No brides' index |
Rusk Co., WI | Poorly organized indexes and records |
Saint Croix Co., WI | No brides' index; indexing method tedious, 3.75 hours to scan marriages |
Sheboygan Co., WI | No brides' index 1917 - 1973 |
Vilas Co., WI | Some indexes fully alphabetized. Low population, quick search. |
Walworth Co., WI | Computer indexes: B 1980-present, M 1962-present, D 1944-present; old indexes overlap computerized |
Washington Co., WI | Card system until 1960 may be awkward; computer index after 1960 |
Waukesha Co., WI | Computerized index for all records after 1907. Confusing indexes for pre-1907 marriages. |
Waupaca Co., WI | No brides' index before 1938 |
Winnebago Co., WI | Fully alphabetized indexes for b,m,d to 1912. 3 hours to scan rest of indexes. |
Wood Co., WI | No brides' index 1940-1970 |