|
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.
Mother: Susan Melinda KOONCE |
_Joel Jackson CONEY _+ | (1812 - 1859) m 1838 _Lemuel Jasper Jackson (Jap) CONEY C.S.A._| | (1839 - 1862) m 1860 | | |_Emeline MORGAN _____+ | (1820 - 1884) m 1838 _Joel Arthur CONEY ____| | (1861 - 1925) | | | _Peter Arthur QUIN __+ | | | (1812 - 1880) | |_Mary Judith "Mollie" QUIN _______________| | (1840 - 1864) m 1860 | | |_Tamantha GRAY ______+ | (1820 - ....) | |--Jasper Arthur CONEY | (1888 - 1964) | _____________________ | | | __________________________________________| | | | | | |_____________________ | | |_Susan Melinda KOONCE _| (1869 - ....) | | _____________________ | | |__________________________________________| | |_____________________
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.
Father: ARCHIBALD DOUGLAS 5th Earl of Douglas Mother: EUPHEMIA GRAHAM Countess of Stratherne |
_ARCHIBALD "the Grim" DOUGLAS 3rd Earl of Douglas_+ | (1325 - 1400) m 1362 _ARCHIBALD DOUGLAS 4th Earl of Douglas_| | (1370 - 1424) | | |_JOHANNA MORAY ___________________________________+ | (1340 - ....) m 1362 _ARCHIBALD DOUGLAS 5th Earl of Douglas__| | (1390 - 1439) m 1425 | | | _ROBERT III de Bruce STEWART of Scotland__________+ | | | (1337 - 1406) m 1365 | |_MARGARET STEWART of Galloway__________| | (1370 - 1451) | | |_ANNABELLE DRUMMOND ______________________________+ | (1349 - 1401) m 1365 | |--MARGARET "the Fair Maid of Galloway" DOUGLAS | (1430 - ....) | __________________________________________________ | | | _PATRICK GRAHAM of Strathearn__________| | | (1370 - ....) | | | |__________________________________________________ | | |_EUPHEMIA GRAHAM Countess of Stratherne_| (1400 - 1468) m 1425 | | _DAVID de Bruce STEWART Palatine of Strathearn____+ | | (1356 - ....) m 1376 |_EUPHEMIA STEWART _____________________| (1380 - ....) | |_EUPHEME LINDSAY _________________________________+ (1364 - ....) m 1376
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.
Mother: Elizabeth Glenn WHITE |
_John EUBANK ______________+ | (1680 - 1778) _James EUBANK Sr.________| | (1725 - 1799) m 1748 | | |_Elizabeth "Betsy" RAINES _ | (1697 - ....) _Joseph E. Lewis EUBANK Sr._| | (1768 - 1850) m 1794 | | | _Joseph LEWIS _____________+ | | | (1690 - ....) | |_Margaret (Peggy) LEWIS _| | (1730 - 1799) m 1748 | | |___________________________ | | |--Henry Royal White EUBANK | (1795 - 1876) | ___________________________ | | | _Henry WHITE ____________| | | (1755 - 1810) | | | |___________________________ | | |_Elizabeth Glenn WHITE _____| (1774 - 1826) m 1794 | | ___________________________ | | |_Elizabeth GLENN? _______| (1760 - 1810) | |___________________________
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.
Mother: ISABELLE de ST. LEGER |
_______________________________ | _ROBERT de HOO ________________| | (1274 - 1340) | | |_______________________________ | _THOMAS de HOO of Luton Hoo_| | (1310 - 1380) | | | _______________________________ | | | | |_______________________________| | | | |_______________________________ | | |--JOAN de HOO | (1350 - 1394) | _JOHN ST. LEGER Lord Of Offley_+ | | (1280 - 1326) | _JOHN ST. LEGER Lord Of Offley_| | | (1300 - ....) | | | |_JEANNE of Holcote Northampton_ | | (1280 - ....) |_ISABELLE de ST. LEGER _____| (1319 - 1393) | | _______________________________ | | |_ISABELLE______________________| (1300 - ....) | |_______________________________
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.
|
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.
Mother: Mary RANSOME |
_Henry PERKINS (PURKINS) II_+ | (1690 - 1738) m 1716 _Henry PERKINS (PURKINS) III_| | (1718 - 1780) m 1743 | | |_Cary FERGUSON (FARGESON) __+ | (1690 - 1742) m 1716 _Henry PERKINS (PURKINS) IV_| | (1745 - 1803) m 1766 | | | _William GATEWOOD __________+ | | | (1695 - 1743) m 1720 | |_Elizabeth GATEWOOD _________| | (1724 - 1765) m 1743 | | |_Katherine CARTER __________+ | (1700 - 1765) m 1720 | |--Daniel PERKINS (PURKINS) | (1776 - 1795) | ____________________________ | | | _Flemstead RANSOME __________| | | (1720 - ....) | | | |____________________________ | | |_Mary RANSOME ______________| (1750 - 1820) m 1766 | | ____________________________ | | |_____________________________| | |____________________________
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.
|
__ | __| | | | |__ | _Joshua SEALE _______| | (1770 - ....) | | | __ | | | | |__| | | | |__ | | |--Martha Jane SEALE | (1803 - 1859) | __ | | | __| | | | | | |__ | | |_____________________| | | __ | | |__| | |__
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.
Mother: Sarah Dabney STROTHER |
Born in Virginia in 1784, he was taken as an infant to Kentucky
and raised on a plantation. He was a career officer in the Army,
but his talk was most often of cotton raising. His home was in
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and he owned a plantation in
Mississippi.
"Old Rough and Ready's" homespun ways were political assets. His
long military record would appeal to northerners; his ownership
of 100 slaves would lure southern votes. He had not committed
himself on troublesome issues. But Taylor did not defend slavery
or southern sectionalism; 40 years in the Army made him a strong
nationalist.
He spent a quarter of a century policing the frontiers against
Indians. In the Mexican War he won major victories at Monterrey
and Buena Vista.
In February 1850 President Taylor had held a stormy conference
with southern leaders who threatened secession. He told them
that if necessary to enforce the laws, he personally would lead
the Army. Persons "taken in rebellion against the Union, he
would hang ... with less reluctance than he had hanged deserters
and spies in Mexico." He never wavered.
Then events took an unexpected turn. Zachary Taylor spent July
4, 1850, eating cherries and milk at a ceremony at the
Washington Monument. He got sick from the heat and died five
days later, the second president to die in office.
After his death, the forces of compromise triumphed, but the war
Taylor had been willing to face came 11 years later. In it, his
only son Richard served as a general in the Confederate Army.
Zachary TAYLOR
BIRTH: 24 SEP 1784, Montebello, VA
DEATH: 9 JUL 1850, Washington, DC
REFERENCE: FTJ#24
Father: Richard TAYLOR
Mother: Sarah Dabney STROTHER
Family 1: Margaret Mackall SMITH
MARRIAGE: 21 JUN 1810, Jefferson Co. KY
1. Sarah Knox TAYLOR m. Jefferson F. Davis, Pres. of CSA.
2. Anne Margaret Mackhall TAYLOR
3. Octavia Pannel TAYLOR
4. Margaret Smith TAYLOR
5. Mary Elizabeth "Betty" TAYLOR
6. Richard TAYLOR
From C-Span American Presidents 531/99
A cheerleader type General who put himself on the front.
Very respected and loved by all his troops. Kind and benevolent
to his slaves.
Taylor fought in Florida against the Seminole Wars.
He opposed the Mexican War & the annexation of Texas. He opposed
the combined bill of the Compromise of 1850, but supported
separate bills. He did not take sides on the Slavery Issue -
Territories belonged to all states until accepted in the Union.
The victory of the Mexican War resulted in Texas, California,
Arizona & New Mexico as slavery issues revolving around the
compromise and possible succession. Taylor was strong against
succession, but would never have drawn his sword against the
South. His approach to the South was to accept and settle for
what we have.
His trusty steed, "Old Whitie" grazed on the White House lawn.
Originally buried in Washington, moved 3 mos later to his Family
Tomb in Louisville, KY and moved again to a monument built by
The Federal government 30 ft away from the original tomb (both
can be seen at the cemetary and monuments). Now a National
Cemetery, named Zachary Taylor National Cemetery with 13,000
burials.
In 1991 Descendants exhumed his body to determine if arsenic was
present - Clara Rising, Historian Professor, wrote a book
regarding the suspicions of arsenic posioning by a Dr. Miller
who was on the medical staff of the White House and is also
suspected of posioning Pres. Wm Henry Harrison, eight years
before. The exhumation did not provide proof.
says Zachary Taylor had a child by a Slave Mulatto, named
William Henry Taylor b abt 1835 in Baton Rouge, LA, who m.
Elizabeth Trafford, Mar 16, 1872 and m. (1) Annie Hoare, 1868,
Hamilton.
My William Henry Taylor. I have found the census for 1871 and he
is listed as 36 in 1871 which would make him born in 1835. He
was not settled in Hamilton until about 1848 during preperation
for election.
His first wife Anne was 20 in 1871 and my Grandfather William
Arthur Taylor was listed as 1 year old. As yet I have not found
out when Anne died. We think about 1875 or so. And William Henry
re Married to Miss Trafford. The family had about 13 kids but
only 5 moved to Winnipeg, Canada.
William Henry was born some time around 1835 in Baton Rouge.
Zackary had a home there right up untill he was elected
president and also had a plantation on the Missasippi called
Cypress Grove where he had slaves.
It was listed in his affairs. Zackary never sold any slaves and
had many older slaves. He paid them a bonus at each harvest.
Records indicate that he treated his slaves more as servants
than slaves and did not have a runaway problem. On reference
said that slavery at Cypress Grove was as idilike as it ever
could be. His wife was not too happy with him during his time in
the white house. His daughter performed most of the First Lady
functions. Our family story suggests that after Richard was born
she did not want further children. Zackary purchased William
Henry's mother from New Orleans for personel duties. She was
Milato and born in the Carrabean. Ill let you know if I find
more. To my eye the family resemblance is very close.
thePROVINGground
The Mexican War gave future civil war generals their first taste
of combat
JOHN C. WAUGH
Chatham Roberdeau Wheat would one day lead a famous Louisiana
battalion called "Wheat's Tigers" into battle for the
Confederacy. He would fight and die in the Battle of Gaines'
Mill, Virginia, in 1862. But that was still some 15 years in the
future; right now, the young law student's attention was
directed toward adventure in another conflict, the Mexican War
of the 1840s. There, whether he lived or died, he would be a
winner, a hero. In his own florid fashion, he wrote: "I would
ask for no greater glory--while our spirits should wing their
flight to a brighter & a better world where we should enlist
under the captaincy of Great Michael and mingle with the hosts
of Heaven--and...with Washington & the heroes that have gone
before, hang out our banners from the battlements of Heaven &
let the shout of our exulting voices ring from arch to arch of
heaven's bright canopy."
In the best case, of course, Wheat and his comrades would live,
be victorious, enter the city of Mexico, and stand in the halls
of the Montezumas "covered with glory & with bright stars upon
our breasts...." In either case, he concluded, "we are
victorious, victorious even in death--how sublime! How pleasing
the thought!"
George Brinton McClellan, who would command the Union armies
early in the Civil War, was a fire-new graduate of West Point
when the Mexican War began. He couldn't wait to get to the front
and fight "the crowd--musquitoes & Mexicans &c." "Hip! Hip!
Hurrah!" he wrote home. "War at last sure enough! Aint it
glorious!"
For young army officers of the time, the Mexican War was not
only the road to glory, it was the road to promotion.
Advancement in the peacetime army was maddeningly slow. An
officer could stagnate in the same low grade year after year
until those above him were promoted, resigned, or died, making
room for his own advancement. When war came, everything speeded
up. Armies expanded and fought, the unfortunate were killed, and
the fortunate were promoted. Most young subalterns welcomed the
war for that reason.
What they didn't know was that the war would be their rite of
passage, their crucible, their proving ground. They would learn
how to endure hardship, how to inspire the loyalty of troops,
how to fight and win battles. In that reasonably tidy little
foreign war of 1846-1848, they would be tempered for command in
an incomprehensibly larger and messier domestic war to come: the
American Civil War.
Compared to the Civil War, the Mexican War was small. Of the
17,000 or so Americans who became casualties during the
conflict, only about 1,700 were killed in battle. The Union Army
suffered a larger number of casualties in just three days of
fighting at the Battle of Gettysburg in the Civil War. Despite
this difference in scale, the Mexican War was by no means
insignificant. It would add half a million square miles of
territory to the United States, territory that would become the
modern states of Arizona, California, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah,
and part of Colorado. Indeed, it was the desire for westward
expansion that sparked the war.
When the United States admitted the Republic of Texas as a state
in December 1846, the Mexican government still considered Texas
a rebellious Mexican province. Tension between the two countries
prompted U.S. President James K. Polk to dispatch Brigadier
General Zachary Taylor to Texas with a force of 3,000 men to
"defend the Rio Grande."
Anti-American Mexicans viewed this as an act of war. Many
Americans felt the same, seeing the move as a case of blatant
aggression against a weaker nation, designed to satisfy the
United States' lust for territory. Congressman Abraham Lincoln
of Illinois was one of the most vocal critics of the war. Army
Lieutenant Ulysses S. Grant, who would eventually command all
Union armies in the Civil War, called the conflict in Mexico
"one of the most unjust ever waged by a stronger against a
weaker nation."
Despite his reservations, Grant accompanied Taylor on his march
across Texas in March 1846. On arriving at the Rio Grande,
Taylor's troops built an earthen fort in a provocative position
across the river from the Mexican city of Matamoros. The Mexican
War could be said to have begun when Mexican artillery finally
opened fire on the fort in May. When Grant heard the bombardment
from his camp miles away, he later wrote, "I felt sorry that I
had enlisted."
Others, like McClellan, were not yet in Mexico and were just as
sorry to be missing the action. The Battles of Palo Alto and
Resaca de la Palma, both American victories against larger
Mexican forces, came within a week of the first bombardment.
Taylor entered Matamoros on May 18 and in July pushed west on a
campaign toward the city of Monterey. There, again, the
Americans would be outnumbered by their Mexican foes.
Monterey was extraordinarily well fortified and surrounded by
rugged terrain. The battle for the city would last three days
and cost hundreds of American casualties.
On the third day of the battle, the Americans had taken control
of Monterey's outskirts and began pressing in from all sides
toward the grand plaza at its center, held by Mexican troops. An
American head poked into one of the streets radiating out from
the plaza would instantly summon a hail of artillery and musket
fire, and snipers seemed to lurk on every roof. Lieutenant
Grant, although officially acting as a regimental quartermaster,
had managed to find his way to the firing line. When the unit he
accompanied began to run out of ammunition, he volunteered to
ride to Taylor's headquarters to plead for more.
One of the finest horseman ever to pass through West Point,
Grant found a creative solution to the hazard of moving through
Monterey's open streets. He swung to the side of his horse
farthest from the enemy, leaving only one foot holding to the
cantle of the saddle and one arm over the neck of the
horse--Indian style. Shielded from stray bullets by his mount's
body, Grant sped through the streets at such a furious clip that
few of the city's defenders got off clean shots at him; both man
and horse arrived at headquarters unharmed.
Thanks to that and similar instances of audacity, creative
tactics, and good luck, the Americans were able to overcome
Monterey. It was a resounding triumph for Taylor; news of the
victory spread quickly north to the United States. To some eager
young officers who had yet to reach the front, missing that
battle seemed the ultimate tragedy of their military lives.
McClellan was among those who arrived too late for the fight. It
was "a piece of bad luck," he moaned, "which I shall regret as
long as I live."
McClellan would soon see his share of action. Taylor's victories
were producing no overtures of surrender from the Mexican
government. Convinced that nothing less than a campaign against
the national capital, Mexico City, would bring the war's end,
President Polk sent Major General Winfield Scott, the army's
senior commander, to organize a coastal invasion of central
Mexico. For that operation, Scott requisitioned the cream of
Taylor's force: most of his U.S. Army regulars and his cadre of
West Point-trained officers. Taylor reluctantly acceded to
Scott's order and remained at Monterey with a force consisting
primarily of volunteers.
Taylor's volunteers would be tested in one last fight: the
Battle of Buena Vista. There, Taylor was nearly routed by a
larger Mexican army led by General Antonio Ląpez de Santa Anna.
The swift and resolute action of troops from Indiana and
Mississippi saved the day. The commander of the Mississippi
volunteers was Jefferson Davis, future president of the
Confederacy.
Buena Vista was the end of the campaign in northern Mexico, but
far from the end of the war. Taylor stayed in Monterey and later
returned home, but Scott spent the winter preparing a sea-borne
invasion of Mexico's greatest port, Vera Cruz. McClellan,
meanwhile, was having the time of his young life. Around the
campfires at night, he wrote his mother, "you never saw such a
merry set as we are--no care, no trouble--we criticize the
Generals--laugh & swear at the mustangs & volunteers...." Waking
before dawn was common: "When on a march, we get up at 2 or 3,
when we halt, we snooze it, till 8 or 9--when we have cigars we
smoke them, when we have none, we go without--when we have
brandy, we drink it, when we have not, we make it up by laughing
at our predicament--that is the way we live."
The novelty of campaign life did little to ease the desire for
battle, especially for one of McClellan's West Point classmates,
a young artillery lieutenant named Thomas Jonathan Jackson.
Jackson would become one of America's most famous generals,
earning the nickname "Stonewall" during his service to the
Confederacy. But in 1847 he had yet to hear a shot fired in
anger. Walking on a beach in February with another future
Confederate general, Lieutenant Daniel Harvey Hill, he said: "I
really envy you men who have been in action. We who have just
arrived look upon you as veterans." Then he added wistfully, "I
should like to be in one battle."
Jackson would not have long to wait. Early in March, Scott
landed his army of around 10,000 men on the beaches near Vera
Cruz, along with a host of cannon. The walled city was nearly
impervious to infantry attack, so Scott decided to shell it into
submission. Jackson manned one of the batteries that began
bombarding the city later that month. A cannonball came within
five steps of sweeping him into oblivion, but he paid it no
mind; he was doing what he most wanted--commanding guns in
battle and attracting glittering acclaim for his coolness and
judgment. One of his West Point classmates, Lieutenant William
Montgomery Gardner, a future Confederate brigadier, saw him
under fire for the first time and said "Old Jack" was "as calm
in the midst of a hurricane of bullets as though he were on
dress parade at West Point."
The success of the bombardment of Vera Cruz would depend not
only on the skill of the artillerists, but also on the efforts
of the engineers who oversaw the landing and placement of the
guns. One of them was a 40-year-old captain named Robert E. Lee.
Lee's only previous field service had been a brief stint with
Taylor, but from the moment he joined Scott's staff in January
1847, he began to shoulder ever greater responsibility. His role
in positioning guns for the siege of Vera Cruz could be seen as
his first step up the ladder toward military fame and
immortality. The bombardment brought the city's surrender in
less than a week.
Scott consolidated his force at Vera Cruz and then began a march
inland up the National Road toward Mexico City. This movement
met its first resistance in mid-April near the town of Cerro
Gordo. There, Santa Anna had entrenched his troops in strong
positions along the only passable road through the mountains for
miles. Scott saw that any frontal assault on Santa Anna's
positions would be suicidal. He asked his engineers to find a
route to the flank or rear of the Mexican position. A young
lieutenant with the lyrical name of Pierre Gustave Toutant
Beauregard thought he had spied such a route: he suspected the
dense jungle and ravine-scarred landscape on the Mexicans' left
could be penetrated. Like McClellan and Lee, Beauregard was an
engineer, an officer who specialized in reconnaissance and in
moving men and equipment through hostile terrain. And like Lee,
he would later become one of the Confederacy's top generals.
Beauregard's speculation prompted Scott to send Lee, fast
becoming the general's trusted right hand, to investigate.
Gifted with a singular sense of direction and an unparalleled
feeling for topography, Lee determined that Scott's army could
indeed cut a path where Beauregard suspected and surprise Santa
Anna's forces.
Scott did exactly that. While part of his force feinted against
the Mexican front to draw Santa Anna's attention, the bulk of
the American army crept through the dense underbrush and passed
through deep ravines to reach the Mexican rear. There, in a
classic surprise attack, they swept Mexican troops from poorly
defended positions. Santa Anna's army broke and retreated toward
Mexico City.
Scott settled into camp at the cities of Jalapa and Puebla to
await reinforcements and, perhaps, peace overtures from the
Mexican government. But he quickly ran into problems supplying
his army from its base at Vera Cruz. The route between his
inland bases and the coast was long and filled with Mexican
guerrillas, and he could not spare enough troops to make sure
his supply trains arrived safely. In the face of this quandary,
Scott made a bold decision: he abandoned the lengthy supply line
and consolidated his force at Puebla. His army would survive on
whatever it could wrest from the Mexican countryside and its
inhabitants.
To everyone's surprise, it worked. Mexico City made no request
for peace negotiations, but Scott was able to maintain his army
as an effective fighting force through the summer. And when
reinforcements arrived, swelling his army to about 13,000 men,
he decided to push farther inland.
South of Mexico City, the Americans again encountered defenders
in overwhelmingly strong positions. Again Scott turned to his
engineers, particularly Lee, to find an option other than a
pointless frontal attack. Again Lee served him well. The rugged
terrain in the area included the Pedregal, as pure an impassable
piece of desolation as any army would ever see, a barren
no-man's-land that looked as if a tumbling sea of molten lava
had instantly congealed. It was fissured, pocked with caves,
bristling with jagged outcroppings, and devoid of life. Santa
Anna felt secure enough to leave the area only lightly guarded;
there seemed no way to push a goat, let alone an army, through
such a dead desert. But Lee found a way and led a team of
workmen on an expedition to cut a path for Scott's army. The
resulting Battle of Contreras, on August 20, was another
American victory, and the Mexican army retreated north to nearby
Churubusco.
There, another battle came on the same day as Contreras. Again,
Santa Anna's troops held strong defensive positions. This time,
though, there was no alternative to a frontal assault. Scott
attacked from several directions at once. He did not pause to
reconnoiter, instead relying on the momentum of his troops, who
were pursuing fleeing Mexicans from Contreras.
The Battle of Churubusco lasted all afternoon and cost Scott
more than 1,000 casualties, but again he triumphed, thanks to
the bravery and skill of his soldiers. A number of young men
distinguished themselves on the field at Churubusco, including
Philip Kearny, a captain of dragoons who suffered wounds that
cost him his left arm. He owed his survival to a lieutenant who
bravely ensured his safe return to American lines. Kearny would
later become a major general in the Union army during the Civil
War. His rescuer, Richard Ewell, would achieve the rank of
lieutenant general--and lose a leg--fighting for the
Confederacy.
Scott had at last forced Santa Anna into Mexico City itself.
Now, the city's defenses were all that stood between the
Americans and victory. Early in September, Scott made his move.
The linchpin of the city's defenses was Chapultepec, a towering
hill surmounted by a fortified castle bearing the same name.
After a costly preliminary fight at Molino Del Rey on September
8, Scott launched an attack on Chapultepec on the 13th. If he
could carry the castle, he would control the ground in front of
the final Mexican defenses at the city's gates.
One of the battalions attacking Chapultepec was led by
Lieutenant Colonel Joseph E. Johnston. Beauregard, who witnessed
the assault, later wrote that "the gallant Colonel Johnston"
urged his men on "against as terrible a fire as I had yet seen!"
The battalion was Johnston's first independent command; he would
be brevetted to full colonel for his part in the battle and
would eventually join Beauregard as one of the highest-ranking
generals in the Confederacy.
Chapultepec would not fall without a fight. Lieutenant Jackson
could attest to the passion of the castle's defenders; he was on
the army's left when the assault began and soon found himself in
a mess of trouble. In plain view of most of the army, Jackson
was stuck in a ditch with his guns, under heavy cannon fire.
Nearly all the horses in his battery had been killed or wounded,
and his men had scattered for cover. His infantry support,
except for a small escort that continued to try to hold its
ground, had also disappeared.
Not only could Jackson himself not disappear under the
circumstances, he didn't want to. He intended to return fire, if
he could just get his guns over the ditch and aimed at the
enemy. But he was working alone. He had lifted one gun over, but
needed help to take it any farther. He strode up and down the
shot-torn road, prodding and exhorting his cowering command.
"There is no danger!" he lied, as a cannonball caromed between
his legs. "See! I am not hit!"
His men stared back at him with justified skepticism. The rest
of the army could hardly bear to watch. His commander sent an
order to retire, but Jackson replied that it would be more
dangerous now to withdraw than to stay. If the general would
give him 50 veterans, he would attempt to capture the Mexican
breastwork instead. Help finally did come, and Jackson got his
gun into position and engaged the Mexican battery in a virtual
muzzle-to-muzzle shootout. In time, thanks mainly to Jackson's
sheer will, the enemy gun was overpowered and the breastwork
stormed.
Jackson was not the only one to distinguish himself that day.
Among the first men in the ditch guarding the castle was
Lieutenant Lewis A. Armistead. A step behind him, bearing the
colors, was Lieutenant James Longstreet. And beside him was the
man who had finished dead last in Jackson and McClellan's West
Point class, Lieutenant George E. Pickett. A musket ball struck
Longstreet, but as he fell Pickett caught the colors and carried
them heroically over the wall and into the castle. Last at West
Point, Pickett was first at Chapultepec.
Little did these three young men suspect that 16 years later, on
a hot July 3, 1863, at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, their destinies
would again intertwine. On that day Longstreet would command the
Confederate corps that would make the most famous charge in
American history. Directly under him, in command of the main
division making the charge--and for whom the charge would be
named--would be George Pickett. One of Pickett's brigadiers,
destined to die there, would be Lewis Armistead.
Unlike Pickett's Charge at Gettysburg, the charge at Chapultepec
was a success. The Americans overran the castle in just over an
hour, but Mexico City was not yet theirs. They had only made it
possible to attack the last line of defense at the city's gates.
As Jackson raced down the causeway toward the city with his
artillery caisson, dying to administer the coup de grce, he was
accompanied by Lieutenants D.H. Hill and Barnard Bee. All were
urging Captain John Magruder, a hothead himself, to let them
continue the assault. All four of these officers would one day
be Confederate generals.
Two others in that category, Beauregard and Lieutenant Cadmus
Marcellus Wilcox, were at that moment in deep trouble at the
Belen Gate, at the southwest corner of the city. Both were
finding it an "emphatically hot place"--so hot that nearly
everyone there was wounded, including Beauregard. Wilcox,
however, led a charmed life. A Mexican musket ball hammered into
the side of the Colt revolver hanging on his left hip, spinning
him around and dazing him. But he was unhurt, and when he picked
up the musket ball that had struck his revolver, he found it
flattened to the thickness of a silver dollar by the force of
the impact. Clearly stamped on one side of this lead wafer was
the name of the pistol's maker and the place where it was made.
The same luck would follow Wilcox through the Civil War. At the
Battle of White Oak Swamp, Virginia, in 1862, he would take half
a dozen bullet holes through his clothing but emerge untouched.
Indeed, he would pass through his four years of service to the
Confederacy without a single serious injury.
North of the Belen Gate into Mexico City was the San Cosme Gate,
where resistance to the invaders was equally spirited. Ulysses
S. Grant, still nominally a regimental quartermaster, had again
made his way to the front lines. As his comrades dodged Mexican
bullets, Grant spied a church belfry that seemed to command the
area behind the gate. He commandeered a mountain howitzer,
ordered it hauled up into the belfry, and from there, less than
300 yards from the gate, dropped fire on a startled and
confounded enemy with striking effect. The Americans controlled
both gates before evening and prepared for a final push through
the city on the following day. But Santa Anna evacuated
overnight, and the next day city authorities surrendered. The
war was all but over.
The Mexican War gave America's young crop of army officers a
taste of glory and opportunity for advancement, but it also gave
them a look at what war was really like. They didn't always like
what they saw. After Mexico City fell, Jackson wrote his sister
in Virginia that he had "seen sights that would melt the heart
of the most inhuman of beings: my friends dying around me and my
brave soldiers breathing their last on the bloody fields of
battle, deprived of every human comfort, and even now I can
hardly open my eyes after entering a hospital, the atmosphere of
which is generally so vitiated as to make the healthy sick."
Jackson was finding that while battle elated him, war did not.
Even as hawkish an officer as George McClellan lost some of his
enthusiasm during the war. At Contreras he had two horses killed
under him and was knocked flat when canister fire struck the
hilt of his sword. By the war's end, when he was in Mexico City
and still alive, he would say: "Here we are--the deed is done--I
am glad no one can say 'poor Mac' over me."
When "the deed was done" and the participants looked back on the
war, they all agreed it was an unparalleled military experience.
Grant, who would one day have a few successes of his own on
other fields, praised Scott and summed up the accomplishment
this way: "He invaded a populous country, penetrating two
hundred and sixty miles into the interior, with a force at no
time equal to one-half of that opposed to him; he was without a
base; the enemy was always intrenched, always on the defensive;
yet he won every battle, he captured the capital, and conquered
the government."
Although from the beginning of the war to the end of it some
100,000 men, regulars and volunteers, entered the American army,
at no time did more than 14,000 fight in any one battle. Scott
entered the valley of Mexico with only 9,000 troops and was not
reinforced until after Mexico City had fallen. In every battle
fought, the Mexicans were superior--often overwhelmingly so--in
numbers of troops and small arms and in numbers and weight of
artillery. They had a superior cavalry and fought gallantly.
Yet, the Americans consistently defeated them. Why?
What the American army had that the Mexicans didn't was
overwhelming superiority in military skill. The Mexicans were
outgeneraled and outmaneuvered at the top. But even more
important, they were outmanned in the middle by the solid core
of young officers, West Pointers mostly, who formed the backbone
of the army's officer corps.
The group of officers who earned the most voluminous praise were
West Point engineers. Lieutenants McClellan and Beauregard and
Captain Lee were among the bright engineering talent that shone
like burnished steel throughout the war. Their ability literally
shaped victories for General Winfield Scott along the National
Road from Vera Cruz to Mexico City in the spring and summer of
1847. All would go on to command huge armies in the coming Civil
War. Even in that group of luminaries, though, one officer shone
more brightly than most: Robert E. Lee.
There was not a general in the American army in Mexico who
didn't, between Vera Cruz and Mexico City, praise the work of
this brilliant engineer at least once. Scott called Lee's two
trips across the Pedregal near Contreras on the night of August
19 "the greatest feat of physical and moral courage performed by
any individual, in my knowledge, pending the campaign."
Lieutenant Ewell, who would one day command a corps in Lee's
Army of Northern Virginia, wrote in his account of that battle:
"I really think one of the most talented men connected with this
army is Capt. Lee, of the Engs. By his daring reconnaissances
pushed up to the cannon's mouth, he has enabled Genl. Scott to
fight his battles almost without leaving his tent."
A decade after the war, Scott was still aglow over Lee,
describing him in an official letter as "the very best soldier
that I ever saw in the field." When the Civil War was just
beginning in April 1861, Scott was the aged, overweight, and
immobile general-in-chief of the U.S. Army. He still thought
enough of Lee's abilities that he suggested the colonel for
command of the entire Federal force then being assembled to put
down the rebellion. Lee refused--he could not take up arms
against his people in seceding Virginia--but the offer was a
signal honor.
Lee may have been the star of Scott's campaign, but he was by no
means alone in earning the commanding general's praise. Scott
gave credit generally to his young West Point-trained officers.
At Contreras, he exclaimed to Beauregard, "If West Point had
only produced the Corps of Engineers, the Country ought to be
proud of that institution." Later, at a dinner in Mexico City,
he said that but for the science of the military academy "this
army, multiplied by four, could not have entered the capital of
Mexico."
After the war Scott said flatly: "I give it as my fixed opinion
that but for our graduated cadets the war between the United
States and Mexico might, and probably would, have lasted some
four or five years, with, in its first half, more defeats than
victories falling to our share; whereas in less than two
campaigns we conquered a great country and a peace without the
loss of a single battle or skirmish."
The same officer corps that earned such overwhelming praise in
the Mexican War would rise to the highest commands of the Civil
War. Of course, not every great Civil War general learned to
lead armies from the experience in Mexico. Nathan Bedford
Forrest, the unschooled military genius who rose from private to
lieutenant general of cavalry in the Confederacy, was never in
Mexico. William T. Sherman spent the Mexican War on garrison
duty in California, a thousand miles from the heart of the
action. Philip Sheridan was part of an entire generation of
great Civil War commanders who were too young for the Mexican
War. But for many of the generals who rose to highest command in
the Union and Confederate armies, the Mexican War was their war
college, their main preparation for command in the Civil War.
Lee, Grant, Jackson, McClellan, Beauregard, Longstreet, Albert
Sidney Johnston, Joseph E. Johnston, George Gordon Meade, Edmund
Kirby Smith, George H. Thomas, Braxton Bragg, Joseph Hooker, and
dozens of others all learned to make war in Mexico.
Not all of them would apply what they learned equally well, and
some would forget the lessons altogether in the heat of combat,
but Mexico would influence the way they fought nearly every
battle in the Civil War. So it is a fair question: what exactly
did the Mexican War teach them that they then fell back on in
the 1860s, when suddenly they found themselves fighting one
another?
To begin with, they had good teachers in Generals Taylor and
Scott. The two men were cut from entirely different cloth, but
both offered important role models for their young subordinates.
Taylor was the soldier's general. He often came up short on
tactics and he lacked skill in the logistics of war, but when
his men called him "Old Rough and Ready," they meant it as a
compliment. He was somebody to have confidence in. He shared
every hardship in the field with his troops and demonstrated an
astonishing personal courage.
A reporter with Taylor's army wrote in the Cincinnati Chronicle
in early 1847, "Gen. Taylor has gained more influence over his
army than any other general, save Napoleon, that ever lived.
There is not a man of them, I suppose, who ever thinks of any
thing else than success, when Taylor leads them in battle. A
certain conviction rests upon the mind of the soldier that old
Rough and Ready cannot be whipped, and it nerves his arms and
strengthens his heart to do and dare more than he could with any
less feeling of confidence."
General Taylor never made any great show or parade, either of
uniform or retinue. In dress he was possibly too plain, rarely
wearing anything in the field to indicate his rank, or even that
he was an officer; but he was known to every soldier in his army
and was respected by all."
Taylor, Zachary (1784-1850) -- also known as "Old Rough and
Ready" -- Second cousin once removed of Richard Henry Lee;
second cousin of James Madison; third cousin of Henry Lee,
Charles Lee and Richard Bland Lee; father-in-law of Jefferson
Finis Davis; granduncle of Edmund Haynes Taylor, Jr.; third
cousin twice removed of Fitzhugh Lee; first cousin thrice
removed of Elliot Woolfolk Major; second cousin thrice removed
of Edgar Bailey Woolfolk; ancestor of Victor D. Crist. Born in
Orange County, Va., November 24, 1784. Whig. Major in the U.S.
Army during the War of 1812; colonel in the U.S. Army during the
Black Hawk War; general in the U.S. Army during the Mexican War;
President of the United States, 1849-50; died in office 1850.
Episcopalian. Died, probably of gastroenteritis, in the White
House, Washington, D.C., July 9, 1850. Original interment at
Congressional Cemetery, Washington, D.C.; reinterment in private
or family graveyard; reinterment in 1926 at Zachary Taylor
National Cemetery, Louisville, Ky. Taylor counties in Fla., Ga.,
Iowa and Ky. are named for him. Books about Zachary Taylor: K.
Jack Bauer, Zachary Taylor: Soldier, Planter, Statesman of the
Old Southwest.
Zachary Taylor
Zachary Taylor was born in Orange County, Virginia, in 1784. His
father Richard (1744-1829) had been a colonel in the Continental
Army during the War of Independence. Within a year, his father
moved the family to Kentucky, where Zachary Taylor he was
appointed a collector at the port of Louisville on the Ohio
River. A tutor was hired to educate Zachary. In 1806 Zachary
volunteered for the brief campaign ending Aaron Burr?s attempt
to create an independent nation in the southwest. In 1808, with
the influence of family friends, including James Madison,
President Thomas Jefferson granted Zachary a commission as first
lieutenant in the Seventh Infantry. Zachary married Margaret
Smith in 1810. They had six children, three of whom survived
him. A daughter, Sarah Knox Taylor, married Jefferson Davis in
1835 and shared his disgraced condition during and after the
Civil War.
Zachary Taylor served in the War of 1812 and the campaign
against Black Hawk in 1832. he served in President William
Harrison's campaign to remove Indians from the southern states
and the campaign against the Seminole Indians in the Everglades.
He achieved the rank of brigadier general after the Battle of
Lake Okeechobee. In 1841 he purchased a plantation in
Mississippi. In 1845, when Texas gained its independence, Taylor
and 3,000 men were ordered to Fort Brown at the mouth of the Rio
Grande River to engage the Mexicans in border skirmished. In
September he and his troops entered Mexico and captured the city
of Monterrey. In 1847 they crossed the mountains and, though
outnumbered, defeated Santa Anna?s army to gain control over
northern Mexico. As a result of his accomplishments, Zachary
Taylor acquired the nickname "Old Rough and Ready."
Taylor learned that the Secretary of War was trying to discredit
him for political purposes. When a letter Taylor wrote critical
of President Polk and the Secretary of War became public, he was
rebuked by authorities in Washington. He attracted the attention
of Washington politicians, newspaper editors and shrewd Whig
politicians who were interested in promoting him as a political
candidate. While he sympathized with the Whigs, he was not
partisan, and in fact never voted. The Whig politicians knew
that, as a plantation owner and slave holder in Mississippi, he
would appeal to southerners. Zachary Taylor was nominated at the
Whig convention in 1848 and, due to a split in the Democratic
Party, won the election and was inaugurated in 1849.
Few presidents have entered office with less knowledge of what
was expected of them. Through clever patronage the Whigs in
Washington enlarged their influence. In 1849 Taylor reluctantly
agreed to efforts to admit California to the Union as a free
state. Mortified by scandals involving trusted cabinet members,
he was determined to reorganize the cabinet. Unfortunately,
while attending the opening ceremony for the construction of the
Washington Monument on the fourth of July 1850, he consumed food
spoiled by the noonday heat. He suffered acute gastroenteritis
and died five days later.
When in the 1990s the body of Zachary Taylor was exhumed for
legal reasons, to determine, once and for all, whether spoiled
food or arsenic (intentional poisoning) caused his death, the
judgment was conclusive: spoiled food.
_James TAYLOR II_______________+ | (1675 - 1730) m 1699 _Zachary TAYLOR Sr._______| | (1707 - 1768) m 1737 | | |_Martha THOMPSON ______________+ | (1679 - 1762) m 1699 _Richard TAYLOR ________| | (1744 - 1829) m 1779 | | | _Hancock LEE of Ditchley_______+ | | | (1653 - 1709) m 1700 | |_Elizabeth LEE ___________| | (1709 - 1745) m 1737 | | |_Sarah Elizabeth ALLERTON _____+ | (1670 - 1731) m 1700 | |--Zachary "Old Rough and Ready" TAYLOR 12th PRESIDENT | (1784 - 1850) | _Francis Thornton STROTHER Sr._+ | | (1698 - 1752) m 1718 | _William Dabney STROTHER _| | | (1726 - 1808) m 1752 | | | |_Susannah DABNEY ______________+ | | (1698 - 1752) m 1718 |_Sarah Dabney STROTHER _| (1760 - 1822) m 1779 | | _Samuel BAYLY Jr.______________ | | (1700 - ....) |_Sarah BAYLY _____________| (1720 - 1774) m 1752 | |_______________________________
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.