Genealogy of Patty Rose
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Children: | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Notes for David WALSBY | ||||||||||
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - David Walsby (also spelled Walsbee and Walsbery) was a freeman in Braintree, Mass., as early as 1651. His wife was named Hannah. He m. (2d) Ruth Bass. David and Hannah had children at Braintree: Samuel, David. [ref 13:97] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Walsbee David Bass Ruth 07m 24d 1656 716 by Major Willard of Concord [ref 16] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DAVID Walsby, Braintree, freem. 1651, by w. Hannah, wh. d. 2 Feb. 1656, had Samuel, and David; and 24 Sept. 1656 m. sec. w. Ruth Ball. [ref 20] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - David Walsby, Braintree 1650; frm. May 7 1651. He m. Hannah, dau. of William Manning, who beq. to his gr. son Samuel; she d. 2 (12) 1655, and he m. 24 (7) 1656, Ruth Bass. Ch. Samuel, David. [ref 37:477] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - | ||||||||||
Notes for Hannah MANNING | ||||||||||
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hannah. In his will, William Manning, senior, refers to his "grandchild Samuel Walsbie." The use of the term "grandchild" may have been more a matter of convenlence than of fact, and Samuel may have been a grandchild, not of William Manning, but of one of his later wives; but it is likely that the expression in the will should be taken exactly as it was used, and that William had a married daughter in the Colony. Hannah d. 1655-6, Feb. 2. [ref 13:97] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Walsbee Hannah F 12m 02d 1655 David 636 [ref 16] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - | ||||||||||
Last Modified 22 Jun 2004 | Created 4 Jan 2005 |