Name |
Samuel LADD |
Birth |
1 Nov 1649, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts36,51 |
Death |
22 Feb 1697/98, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts36,51 |
|
Marriage |
1 Dec 1674, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts36,51 |
|
|
Children: |
1 M |
Daniel LADD |
Birth |
3 Oct 1675, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts36,51 |
Death |
25 Oct 1675, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts36,51 |
|
2 M |
Ens. Daniel LADD |
Birth |
19 Nov 1676, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts36,51 |
Death |
5 Jun 1751, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts51 |
|
|
3 F |
Lydia LADD |
Birth |
25 Sep 1679, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts36,51 |
Death |
22 May 1684, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts36,51 |
|
4 M |
Samuel LADD |
Birth |
22 May 1682, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts36,51 |
Death |
4 Mar 1736, Franklin, Norfolk, Massachusetts |
|
|
5 M |
Nathaniel LADD |
Birth |
9 Sep 1684, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts36,51 |
Death |
11 Jun 1757, Coventry, Tolland, Connecticut |
|
|
6 M |
Ezekiel LADD |
Birth |
14 Feb 1686, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts36,51 |
Death |
abt 1740 |
|
|
7 M |
David LADD (Twin) |
Birth |
13 Apr 1689, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts36,51 |
Death |
13 Apr 1751, Norwich, New London, Connecticut |
|
|
Spouse |
Mary WATERS |
Marriage |
20 Mar 1728/29, Norwich, New London, Connecticut |
|
8 M |
Jonathan LADD (Twin) |
Birth |
13 Apr 1689, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts36,51 |
Death |
abt 1750 |
|
|
9 F |
Abigail LADD |
Birth |
29 Sep 1691, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts36,51 |
Death |
2 Aug 1736, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts51 |
|
|
|
10 M |
John LADD |
Birth |
22 Jun 1694, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts36,51 |
Death |
abt 1750 |
|
Spouse |
Mary MERRILL |
Marriage |
17 Oct 1717, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts51 |
|
11 M |
Joseph LADD |
Birth |
26 May 1697, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts51 |
Death |
9 Jun 1697, Haverhill, Essex, Massachusetts36,51 |
|
Notes for Samuel LADD |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
son of Daniel LADD and Ann
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SAMUEL, Ipswich, s. of the first Daniel, m. a d. of George Corliss. [ref 20]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SAMUEL2 LADD (Daniel1), of Haverhill, West Parish, b. Nov. 1, 1649[Hv]; m. Dec. 1, 1674[Hv], MARTHA2 CORLISS; oath al. Nov., 1677. He was killed by Indians, Feb. 22, 1697-8; adm. est. Aug. 1, 1698. Children: Daniel, Daniel, Lydia, Samuel, Nathaniel, Ezekiel, David, Jonathan, Abigail, John, Joseph. [ref 36:229]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Samuel Lad, s. Daniel and Ann, Nov. 1, 1649. [ref 51]
Samuel Lad, and Martha Corles, Dec. 1, 1674. [ref 51]
Samuel Lad, h. Martha (Corlis), killed, Feb. 22, 1697-8. [ref 51]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Jonathan Haynes and Samuel Ladd, who lived in the western part of the town, had started that morning, with their teams, consisting of a yoke of oxen and a horse, each, and accompanied with their eldest sons, Joseph and Daniel, to bring home some of their hay, which had been cut and stacked the preceding sumner, in their meadow, in the extreme western part of the town. Whey they were slowly returning, little dreaming of present danger, they suddenly found themselves between two files of Indians, who had concealed themselves in the bushes on each side of their path. There were seven of them on a side. With guns presented and cocked, and the fathers, seeing it was impossible to escape, begged for "quarter." To this, the Indians twice replied, "boon quarter! boon quarter! (good quarter.) Young Ladd, who did not relish the idea of being quietly taken prisoner, told his father that he would mount the horse, and endeavor to escape. But the old man forbid him to make the attempt, telling him it was better to risk remaining a prisoner. He cut his father's horse loose, however, and giving him the lash, he started off at full speed, and though repeatedly fired at by the Indians, succeeded in reaching home, and was the means of giving an immediate and general alarm.
Two of the Indians then stepped behind the fathers, and dealt them a heavy blow upon the head. Mr. Haynes who was quite aged, instantly fell, but Ladd did not. Another of the savages then stepped before the latter, and raised his hatchet as if to strike. Ladd closed his eyes, expecting the blow would fall - but it came not - and when he again opened them, he saw the Indian laughing and mocking at his fears. Another immediately stepped behind him and felled him at a blow.
The Indians, on being asked why they killed the old men, said that they killed Haynes because he was 'so old he no go with us;' - meaning that he was too aged and infirm to travel; and that they killed Ladd, who was a fierce, stern looking man, because 'he so sour'. They then started for Penacook, where they arrived, with the two boys. Young Ladd soon grew weary of his situation, and one night after his Indian master and family had fell asleep, he attempted to escape. He had proceeded but a short distance, when he thought that he should want a hatchet to fell trees to assist him in crossing the streams. He accordingly returned, entered a wigwam near his master's, where an old squaw lay sick , and took a hatchet The squaw watched his movements, and probably thinking that he intended to kill her, vociferated with all her strength. This awakened the Indians in the wigwam, who instantly arose, re-captured him, and delivered him again to his master, who bound his hands, laid him upon his back, fastened one of his feet to a tree, and in that manner kept him fourteen nights. They then gashed his face with their knives, filled the wounds with powder, and kept him on his back, until it was so indented in the flesh, that it was impossible to extract it. He carried the scars to his grave, and is now frequently spoken of his descendants as the 'marked man.'
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
Notes for Martha CORLISS |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
MARTHA,2 b. June 2, 1652(Hv); m. Dec. 1, 1674(Hv), SAMUEL2 LADD (Daniel1). [ref 36:114]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
m. Samuel Ladd [ref 20]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Martha Corlis, d. George and Joanna (Davis), Jan. 2, 1652[-3]. [ref 51]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
|