Adam de Gordoun - The first Gordon to come to Scotland

Adam de Gordoun

| Biography Index | Home |

Recently there was some discussion about the first Gordon to come to Scotland. I will be sending several messages concerning the descendency of this line in the hope that it will be of interest to members of the list.

History of the House of Gordon, XVIII Vols. by Edward Gordon of Cairnfield

Vol. I

p. 1 "About this collection -

The manuscripts of the History of the House of Gordon, compiled by the late Edward Gordon of Cairnfild, were placed by his son, George Gordon of Cairnfild, in the Library of King’s College, Aberdeen, Scotland.

The House of Gordon, in Scotland, obtained a complete set of photocopies of the approximate two million - word manuscript in 1973..."

P. 2

[From author’s introduction: "...Similarly and even more so may John Malcolm Bulloch be described as ‘the onlie begetter’ of this account of the Gordons, for without his enthusiasm, indefatigable research, untiring patience, and vast correspondence with all quarters of the globe, no such account would have been possible. It is the more strange that he had no Gordon blood in him, yet it is to him that those who read what follows, and are of Gordon descent, may acknowledge their indebtedness for the story of their family...A considerable number of families, however, have never appeared in print, and his notes about them with, in some cases, manuscript accounts of them were left to the Aberdeen University..."]

The Name of Gordon


p. 114+

It has been stated by some authorities that the family name originated from that of the parish in Berwickshire where the earliest Gordons held their lands, this opinion being based on the general ground that during the eleventh and twelfth centuries Normans and other foreigners who came to Scotland had no family name, and that their descendants too their name from the lands granted in return for services to the Crown, or acquired otherwise. While there certainly numbers of such cases, it is rather a large assumption to say that it was universal....The family historians declare that it was Sir Adam who gave his name to the district and mention the existence of a tribe in Flanders in the time of Julius Caesar who styles it the Gorduni. Such charters as are known to have exited relating to the early Gordons give their name down to 1376 as de Gordun. Each side may have its own opinion, and in any case the name is of respectable antiquity. While all that need be remarked here is th!
at originally spelt Gordun, it came to be written Gordoun or Gordoune as late as the eighteenth century so that in its pronouncement any stress should be on the first syllable...

The Main Stock - Origin

p. 127....The name has been known in France from a very early date, and family historians are agreed that one or more served under Charlemagne. Straloch says that he had a secretary of the name of Gordoun, while the Records of Aboyne state that a Duke de Gordoun was Constable of France and General in Brittany under him. C.A. Gordon in his Esncise History, quoting Duhlessis ‘Annales de France’, gives some further details about the latter stating that his name was John, that Charlemagne created him in 790 duke de Gordoun, and High Constable, that he conquered Brittany, and died at his castle of Moret. ...

P. 129

In view of the existence of the Gourdons in France, the opinion of the Gordon family historians that the first to come to Scotland, Adam, was of French origin may be accepted. He appears to have been one of the French and Norman knights visiting or attached to the Court of Edward the Confessor when Malcolm Canmore fled there for refuge after the seizure of the throne of Scotland by Maelbeatha or Macbeth in the year 1040. Malcolm was well received by the Saxon king who entertained him for a number of years and assisted him to regain the throne in 1057 by support of a number of troops under the Earl of Northumbria. Adam accompanied this body, and from him come the Scottish Gordons described this work. As will be seen later, he and his descendants settled from some three centuries on lands in Berwickshire to which he gave his name.

p. 131 I. Adam de Gordun

In the year 1040, Duncan I., King of Scotland, was defeated and slain near Elgin by Maclbeatha, Maormer of Moray (Shakespeare’s Macbeth) who certainly had some claim to the throne being a grandson of Malcolm II. The son of Duncan, malcolm Canmore fled to England and was received at the Court of Edward the Confessor where he lived for some fifteen years. Risings took place against Maclbeatha, who incidentally was not the villain Shakespeare made him out to be, and one of the most powerful lords, Duff, Thane of Fife, went to England and persuaded Malcolm to make an effort to regain the throne. Edward the Confessor granted Malcolm the aid of some ten thousand men under Siefried, Earl of Northumberland, and with these and some French and Norman knights then at the English Court, Malcolm marched into Scotland. Eventually he met Maclbeatha at Lumphanan, some twenty miles west of Aberdeen, when the usurper was defeated and slain in 1057.

It was in this manner that the Gordons first came into Scotland for among the foreign knights who accompanied Malcolm was Adam de Gordun who, for his services in aiding Malcolm to regain the throne, was granted lands near the lower Tweed, and these lands were called Gordon after his name. We hear no more of Adam till 1093 when Malcolm Canmore invaded England and was defeated and killed near Alnwick. Among the slain was Adam who left a son -

II. Adam de Gordun

William Gordon of Harperfield states that this Adam is mentioned in two charters of the Chartubary of Kelso. The first in or about 1130 by Adam ‘Filius Adae de Gordun’ grants lands specially limited, apparently for the site of a church and cemetery for the parish of Gordun, and extensive pasturage to the Abbey of Kelso founded by King David in 1126. The other is a confirmation to the monks of the Church of St. Mary of Kelso, "the church of St. Michael of Gordun with the whole of its parish namely of Gordun and of Spotheswode (Sottiswode)" and "so long as the abbot and convent of Kelso are willing, the men of the other Gordon, that is to say of Adam, may take the church sacrements there, and there their bodies shall be buried; and again when they please, they shall return to their mother church of Houm."

(Spottiswode in the modern parish of Westeuther is five miles northwest of West Gordon, and Houm (Home now called Hume) four miles to the east. From the above charters it would appear that the church of Houm was the only one to cater for an extensive district and this being found inconvenient, a new church was established more centrally for the inhabitants of the Gordon lands. The phrase, "the men of the other Gordun," one may take to refer to Adam’s retainers. The new Church of St. Michael was entrusted to the Abbey of Kelso for the care of the parish thus founded).

Vol. I

P. 131 Adam, 2nd of that Ilk

Adam, 2nd of that Ilk [Adam, 1st of that Ilk having died in 1093 when Malcolm Canmore invaded England] died in 1138 at the Battle of the Standard [remind me to send info about this battle]. He left 2 sons, Richard de Gordun and Adam of Huntly & Faunes. (The two latter places, Faunes presumabley being what is now marked on the maps as Fans, lie just west of West Gordon; and no doubt were the lands granted to Adam for his maintenance. The accounts give only the Richard’s descendants to any extent, but the two families were reunited into one four generations later.

P. 132 Richard, 3rd of that Ilk

Richard de Gordon, according to the Records of Aboyne, died in 1170. He left a son.

Thomas, 4th of that Ilk

Sir Thomas, as he seems to have been knighted as well as his father, was present when his sovereign, William the Lion, was taken prisoner at Alnwick in 1173, and on the king’s return from a year of captivity, was one of his most constant supporters during the remainder of his reign amid the ever recurring revolts in Galloway, Ross, Caithness, and other parts of the crown. He died about the same time as King William, that is 1214, and was succeeded by his son.

Thomas, 5th of that Ilk

This Thomas, styled the younger, was married to Marjory according to the charters at the time. He was knighted by Alexander II and died in 1258 leaving a daughter, Alicia, who married her third cousin, Adam of Huntly & Faunes. According to the Proney M.S., Adam, brother of Richard, 3rd of that Ilk, was succeeded by Alexander, designated Huntly, who had two sons, William and Adam. Sir William was one of the officers in command of the first Scots contingent of 1000 men that went to the Crusades. He died before Tunis while on the way to Palestine, leaving his lands to his brother Adam who did not long survive him, and was succeeded by his son Adam, the husband of Alicia.

P. 133 Adam of Huntly, 6th of that Ilk

and Alicia

Adam of Huntly ....left Scotland to assist Louis IX of France [in the Crusades]. ...Sir Adam died before reaching Palestine...Alicia died in 1280...They had a son.

P. 134 Adam de Gordun, 7th of that Ilk

Adam de Gordun married an Englishwoman named Marjory and in her right possessed an estate in England for which he had to do homage to the English King [Henry III]. Alexander of Scotland had died the previous year [1286] and his grand daughter, the young Maid of Norway, died in 1290 leaving the throne vacant. The matter was referred to Edward I [of England] who decided in favor of John Balliol to whom Adam adhered. ["Braveheart" fame] ...he [John Balliol] raised an army in the West which was joined by Adam whose Berwickshire lands were plundered by the English during Edward’s victorious invasion of Scotland. When, on the 28th of April 1296, the armies met on the field of Dunbar, Adam was one of the large number which fell in that fight so fatal to Scottish independence. He left a son.

P. 135 Adam de Gordun, 8th of that Ilk

He escaped from Dunbar...and was compelled to surrender at Elgin on the 28th July. His mother, Marjory, had no option but to submit and swear fealty before Edward I which she did on 3rd September. When, in the spring of 1297, Sir William Wallace commenced his noble and patriotic struggle, he was joined by Adam who shared his hardships and brilliant exploits. He distinguished himself at Stirling Bridge, but again had to see Scotland under the feet of the English after Falkirk, a defeat due mainly to the jealousy and treachery of some of the Scottish nobles.

P. 135-37

1308 was an eventful year for Sir Adam. Edward I had died the previous year but he continued his adherence to his successor, Edward II from who he reserved [grant of land and to John Balliol].

During same year he was able to be of service to Robert the Bruce. He secured from Edward II the release of Lamberton, Bishop of St. Andrews and Primate, who had been imprisoned in 1306 for his part in the coronation of Bruce, and also by his exertions saved the life of Sir Thomas Randolph...[a major follower of Bruce’s].

The death of John Balliol in 1314 released Sir Adam from fealty to him and he sought an interview with Robert Bruce. He took service under Randolph who was created Earl of Moray, fighting under his banner at Bannockburn in June, 1314. His services were rewarded by the King granting him new lands [Strathbogie] and employing him on state affairs of high importance...

Sir Adam and Sir Edward Maubisson were chosen to carry the Proclamation of Arbroath, setting forth the grievances suffered from the English and praising the character and rule of Robert..., to the Pope.

He left by his wife, Annabella, at least four sons and a daughter. Of these, the eldest son, Alexander succeeded to the Gordun lands, while William, the second son got Stichell as settled by charter of 1315 and from him are descended the Gordons in Galloway (Vol. XII & XIII). John and Thomas became priests and died unmarried; the daughter, Mary, married Sir Walter Hambledon of Cadzow.

P. 138 Alexander de Gordun, 9th of that Ilk

...died 17 October 1346 at Durham when King David invaded England. He left a son, John. King David was captured.

P. 139 John de Gordun, 10th of that Ilk

Also taken prisoner at Durham and shared his sovereign’s captivity. It was not until 1357 when ransom was paid that he was released. King David confirmed in a charter dated 20th March 1357/8 "confirming to John de Gordun the donation which King Robert I had made to his grandfather, Sir Adam, of the lands of Strathbogie."

He married a lady of the name of Elizabeth and died before 1375, leaving three sons, John who succeeded him; Adam and Robert, both of whom died without issue (Adam entered the church and became Vicar of Cramond).

P. 139-40 John de Gordon, 11th of that Ilk

After the death of his father, his eldest son received from King Robert II a fresh charter of the lands of Strathbogie. This charter, dated the 13th July, 1376, is of great importance. In it, he is designated as Joannes de GORDON .

Sir John, according to the Record of Aboyne, lived until 1394. He married Elizabeth Somervell by whom he had four sons, Adam, who succeeded to the estates and John [see p. 142]. Alexander and Roger who were killed at Hamildon Hill in 1402 leaving no issue.

P. 141 Sir Adam de Gordon, 12th of that Ilk

[See Sir Walter Scott’s drama of Hamildon Hill] Adam married Elizabeth, daughter of Sir William Keith, Great Marshal of Scotland and a younger sister of Muriella, wife of the Duke of Albany. This marriage later brought extensive lands into the hands of the Huntly family. They had a son, John, and a daughter, Elizabeth.

John de Gordon, 13th of that Ilk

Of the last Gordon of that Ilk, there is hardly any record, and indeed has been overlooked by most genealogists, for he did not survive his father more than a few years. He married Agnes, daughter of James Douglas, Lord of Dalkeith, and died in 1408 without issue. The estates consequently passed in the terms of the charter of 1376 to his sister, Elizabeth [see Vol. II, Seton-Gordons]

Return to her uncle, John, the progenitor of the other families of the north

Sir John de Gordon, brother of Sir Adam (12th of that Ilk)

P. 142

There appears to have been a good deal of confusion in the minds of family historians about this uncle of Elizabeth, the heiress. In the ‘Records of Aboyne’ it is stated that Sir John was an elder brother of Sir Adam whom it styles as Huntly and that it was he and not his father who was killed at Otterburn. As a reason for the estates passing to Adam’s daughter, it claims that her uncle’s sons, commonly known as ‘Jock & Tam,’ were illegitimate, but this, as will be shown later, was not actually the case, and they would have been entitled to succeed in terms of the charter of 1376. The only logical conclusion is that this Sir John was a younger and not an elder brother. To add to the confusion, he is styled in certain documents of his time as John de Gordoun, Lord of the same, and one can only conclude that he had a life portion of that part of the Berwickshire lands actually called Gordon, while the head of the family had taken the title of Huntly.

As we have seen, his father and brother were kept too busy in the south, looking after their interests there and defending the eastern March from raids across the Border, to attend to their more recently acquired estate in the north [Strathbogie], so it was entrusted to the younger John, a presumption that is strengthened by the fact that the few documents referring to him deal only with places in the north. One can well imagine that he had a difficult task for the Strathbogie inhabitants were still Celts (Picts_, still in their hearts faithful to their former chief, the Earl of Atholl, and not at all inclined to accept the rule of this newcomer from the south. Yet he did manage to win them over by adopting to a certain extent their ways, marrying the daughter of one of them, and defending them from the onslaughts of their wilder neighbors to the south and west by a band of whom he is said eventually to have been slain. Unfortunately, no record of his accomplishment has been p!
reserved; if any exited, it was destroyed in the later burning of Strathbogie castle by the Douglas, Earl of Moray, but Sir John’s wise management is evinced by his niece Elizabeth having no trouble when she and her husband came to take possession of Strathbogie.

  • History of the House of Gordon, XVIII Vols. by Edward Gordon of Cairnfield

    Vol. I - p. 144-147

    John de Gordon, 13th of that Ilk (cont.)

    His abilities were recognized by his being knighted by Robert III and appointed a Justiciary for selling disputed marches over which uncertainty exited owing to large confiscations and redistributions in the north east. The date of Sir John’s death is given as 1394 so that he predeceased his brothers.

    He married, according to the Balbithan M.S. about 1383, Elizabeth Cruickshank whose father lived at Aswanley, a place about five or six miles up the Deveron from Huntly. It was this marriage that has given rise to questions and disputes as to the legitimacy of his sons... They may be stated here briefly as firstly, that it was inconsistent with the honour of a great lord to have married one so far beneath him, and secondly that if there was any such marriage it was only a handfast one and therefore not lawful. As to the first objection, the marriage was not beneath him as a younger son for the late James Macdonald has pointed out that Elizabeth Cruickshank’s father was a ‘Toshstirgh’ or ‘Toshachdera’; an officer later called a ‘Mair of Fee.’ A Mair of Fee was a judiciary court officail whose duties were to admit and discharge deputies and to carry out the judiciarjusticiary’s orders. As late as 1589, it was considered to be a position of much importance as is shown by a decree!
    t in that year by the Lords of council in favour of George Bisset of Petmeikstoun as hereditary principal Mair of Fee for the Sheriffdom of Aberdeen. Cruickshanks of Aswanley was then more than a petty laird and most probably executive officer or baron bailie to the lord of Strathbogie as Justiciary. As to the legality of the marriage, it was not until the beginning of the fifteenth century that the Roman Church made marriage a sacrament and required the rite to be performed by a priest. The Cruickshank marriage no doubt took place according to the custom of the time and residence of John de Gordon, for he was not knighted apparantly till after May, 1391, by a public proclamation in the courtyard of the castle, followed by attendance at Mass in the chapel.

    His sons therefore may be safely considered as legitimate enough, and certainly appear to have been accepted as near relations by the heiress and her husband, Sir Alexander de Seton. Indeed, it must have been largely on them, John and Tomas, commonly known as Jock of Scurdargue and Tam of Ruthven, dwelling the one at the south, the other at the north end of Strathbogie, that reliance was placed for the safety of that territory by Elizabeth and her husband, engaged as they must have been very much at the Royal Court.


    P. 144-147 John of Scurdargue


    The elder of the two sons of Sir John de Gordon, uncle of the heiress, is stated to have been sent while still a youth to Harris in order to acquire a knowledge of the Gaelic tongue, and this action of his father may be taken as further evidence of his efforts to win the confidence of the Strathbogie folk, and possibly that his son should be able to communicate freely with the Gaelic neighbours to the south and west for on his return he took up his residence at Scurdargue. This place, which gets its name from a neighbouring reddish peak, is now a farm on the south side of the hill called the Tap o’Noth, and is a mile or so west of Rhynie. But the general concensus of opinion is that "Jock" did not actually live at this point but higher up the pass towards the Cabrach on the ancient way to Speyside, at lesmoir where later one of the lines of his descendants established itself.

    The only doucmentary record of Jock that seems to exist is a confirmation in 1423 by James Douglas, Lord of Bercorn, as superior, of a charter granted in 1418 by William Fraser of Philorth of the lands of Ardlach with the mill of Badyehale and multlures in the Barony of Aberdour to "John of Gordon natural son of the late Johon of Gordon knight lord of the same....to be held by the said John and the legitimate heirs male of him and Elizabeth [Maitland] now his spouse failing when the legitimate male heirs of him and any other [later] spouse, failing whom Alexander natural son of the said John and his legitimate maile heirs failing whom Adam natural son of the said John and his legitimate maile heirs failing whom Thomas of Gordon brother of the aforementioned John and his legitimate maile heirs failing whom [other] true and legitimate heirs of Gordon [bearing the] name and arms of Gordon.....Witnesses, Gilbert Bishop of Aberdeen Chancellor of Scotland, Robert abbot of Deer, Alex!
    ander of Seton Lord of Gordon, Andrew Keith Lord of Inverugie, Andrew Giffard.."

    This document has been quoted at some length because apparently on it has been denied the legitimacy of Jock and Tam and also that of Jock’s sons Alexander and Adam, - the latter does not matter much for it does not appear that he had issue (he is not otherwise mentioned), but the former does. As it is therefore of great interest to all descendants of Jock and Tam, its terms are woth an examination. It was dated at Edinburgh on the 16th January, 1422, the old year not coming to an end till the last day of March, and consequently was made after the institution of marriage as a sacrament. Two of the witnesses were Church dignitaries, and a third was the husband of Jock’s cousin, the Gordon heiress. From this one can see the Church influence in the use of the term spouse (sponsa in place of uxor) for Scurdargue’s second wife Elizabeth, his first marriage as we shall see not being according to chruch rites, the term natural being applied to both Jock and Tam, and to Jock’s sons Al!
    exander and Adam, both by the first marriage, and to the insistence of the term legitimate for all future heirs to succeed to the lands mentioned, that is to say they should be the issue of church marriages.

    The date of the document is of importance for it was not long after marriage had been made a sacrament, and the Church was using its influence to do away with marriages not performed according to the rites it had drawn up. It could only, however, frown upon and not declare illegal such marriages, for that required an Act of Parliament, which never was done, since the ancient custom of marriage by a public declaration has remained legal down to the present century. In the case of Scurdargue’s sons by his first wife, it did not deny them the right to succeed to the lands in question but merely differentiated between them and sons by the second marriage, for whose benefit, no doubt, the charter was intended. A curious, though perhaps academic point is that there is no other mention of Ardlach and Badychale, which did not remain in Gordon possession for there is no mention of them being held by any of Jock’s descendants until over three cneturies had lapsed. Curious, too, is the r!
    eason for his acquiring these lands in an out of the way district at a considerable distance from Strathbogie, and it can only be surmised either that there was some connection with hsi second wife such as a life portion, or that they were granted as security for a loan, later repaid, for thought the Frasers of Pholorth held Aberdour for fully two centuries later, at this time they seem to have been in need of money, since in 1424 a somewhat similar charter of other lands of Aberdour was granted to William Forbes of Kinaldie. As will be seen later, the greater part of the barony of Aberdour was acquired by a descendant of Jock’s youngest son in 1480.

    Traditionally, John of Scurdargue is said to have been a man of prodigous strength, ferocious appearance, and a great hunter. His father and he come down to us in an old rhyme...


    "His sire was good Strathbogie’s lord,
    A chief that well wuld wield the sword,
    And from his strength in Huntly tower,
    First gave the name of Gordon power,
    In Buthan, Banff and Moray fair,
    He had broad lands and castles there,
    And coursers many, hawks, and hounds
    He kept within his princely bounds.
    And Jock and Tam, his true sons were,
    As none to doubt the truth may dare.
    Their boars’ heads (Or) on Azure field
    Each bare upon his blazon’d shield.
    Jock o’ Scurdarg had houses grand
    In Bogie, Mar and Buchan land,
    Stralsch, Pitlurg, and Auchindoir,
    Cairburrow, Buckie, and Lesmoir."

    which of course is very much an overstatment for such lands did not come into Gordon possession till after their time.

    His two marriages have been mentioned already. His first wife was Hainault, daughter of Macleod of Harris to whom he was sent as a youth. It is not known whether this took place before or after marriage had been made a sacrament and even if it was after, the news would hardly have reached such a distant spot. It is very unlikely that the marriage was, as has been claimed, a ‘hand-fast’ or temporary one, on account of the important position of her family, her father being the ruler of the district, and her sister the wife of the macintosh chief. Her family would surely have resented as a slur on them any marriage other than one carried out properly according to the recognized custom of the time and place. His second wife was Elizabeth Maitland, daughter of the Laird of Gight, according to the Balbitham M..S. though Dr. Temple states that she was a daughter of Robert Maitland of Netherdale and a sister of Sir Patrick of Netherdale, Gight, and Schiras. His children were:

    1. Alexander of Essie for whom see Section VI

    2. Adam mentioned in the Ardlach grant

    3. John of Auchleuchries for whom see Section VII

    4. William of Tillytermont for whom se Section VII & IX

    5. James of Methlick or Haddo for whom see Section X

    Leaving these aside for the present, we come to John of Scurdargue’s brother.

    History of the House of Gordon, XVIII Vols. by Edward Gordon of Cairnfield

    Vol. I p. 147-149

    Thomas of Ruthven

    If but little is really known about John of Scurdargue, his brother Thomas, commonly called Tam o’Riven, is even more a shadowy figure, though in 1423 he appears as one of the squires to Sir Walter Lindsay of Glenesk when the latter resigned the lands of Coclarachy and Garie (near Huntly) and again twenty five years later as Thomas of Gordon, "armiger" and lord of Auchinrath, with his son John as witnesses to a charter of Sir Lawrence Abernethy of Rothiemay confirming his grant of Auchanachy. Rutheven, from which his designation comes, is a small hamlet, four to five miles north north west of Huntly and takes its name from ‘Ruadh Abhuin,’ the "Red Water." At one time there was also a parish of Ruthven which was joined with Botaire and a part of Drumdelgie to the south and west respectively to form the modern parish of Carinie. Close by the ruinous Ruthven Kirk is the tomb of a warrior in full armour which is reputed to be that of Thomas himself, and in the west gable still han!
    gs the old bell known as the "How of Riven" which is said to have been so named because of its sound to a certain halfwitted "character." This bell was (and is) greatly prized by the Ruthven folk, and a story is told how, when a new kirk was built some distance away and an attempt was made to carry it off by night to the new building, it gradually became heavier and heavier till at last after half a mile its bearers were forced to leave it by the roadside. Coming in search of it the next morning, a few Ruthven folk had no difficulty in picking it up and taking it back to its former position.

    Thomas, however, does not appear to have had his residence at Ruthven itself, but at a Danch about a mile to the north. What appear to be the remains of it are on a knoll or spur between two steep ravines and communicating with the rising ground to the south by a narrow neck to which runs part of an old paved road. These remains consist of the foundations of what was probably the enclosure wall surrounding an area of about 180 by 150 feet with some other stones scattered here and there inside. As a defensive post for the north of Strathbogie, it is a strong position commanding a wide view of lower Starthisla both up and down, and the site remains would be well worth some excavation a dn a closer examination. The position may be recognized by those travelling north by train from Huntly after passing Rothiem ay Station and shortly before reaching Cairnie Junction as on the left of the line and distinguished by the walls of a burnt out cottage which stand up prominent against the!
    sky line.

    Apart from his presumed position as guardian or bailie of northern Strathbogie, he seems, from the names of the four wives with which he is credited, to have spent some time in Ross and even further north. He is also said to have had sixteen sons, but of these only a possible ten are named by the chroniclers and even as to this ten there is confusion among them: the others presumably died young. His first wife was a daughter of Sir James Hay of (Rannes in the ) Enzie, his second wife a daughter of Sir Walter Innes of that Ilk, his third wife a daughter of Chisholm of Strathglass, and his fourth wife, who is given only in the 1600 M.S. and by whom there was no issue, was a Mackay. His sons were-

    l. Patrick of Sauchen, by the first wife, for whom see Section XI, p. 3

    2. Duncan in Clunymore (1670 M.S. The Balbithan and 1600 M.S.S. make him a grandson). He does not appear to have had issue but some of the families in Glenrinnes may be descended from him.

    3. John "of" Invercherrach (1670 M.S. The Balbithan and 1600 M.S.S. make him a great grandson). See Section XI, p. 4

    4. Alexander in Ardmillan (1670 M.S. The 1600 M.S. makes him a grandson and says "he dyed hastilie."

    5. William "of" Balvenie, by the second wife: for whom see Section XI, p. 1

    6. Mr Adam, -----of Moray and parson of Kinkell. (The 1670 M.S. omits him, but the 1600 and Balbithan M.S.S. both style him chancellor of Moray, the latter adding that his "name is upoon several places of the said {Kinkell} church in gilded letters yet extent with their date." The old Kinkell church is on the left bank of the Don a little way below its junction with the Urier). His name appears as a witness or therwise in several documents from 1480 to 1502, in three of them styled as Adam de Gordoune. In May, 1487, he was one of four trustees for the observance of a marriage contract between George, son of William Meldrum of Fyvie and Elizabeth, daughter of James Innes of that Ilk. In April, 1494, he was appointed by James, Earl of Buchan and Lord of Auchberhouse, a deputy with three others to receive certain dues from "Alexander Gordon of Midmar," and in 1502 as a Canon of Aberdeen and rector of Kinkell, he granted on behalf of the Bishop of Aberdeen a pension of 10 pounds S!
    cots from Kemnay parish revenues to Mr. John Garishch. In two documents there is also mentioned a John Gordon, vicar of Stirling, who according to the 1600 M.S., was a cousin of Adam and "a very noble man."

    7. Thomas of Kennerty for whom see Section XI p. 8

    8. George of Chshnie or Hallhead for whom see Section XI p. 25

    9. James of Daach, by the third wife, for whom see Section XI p. 72

    10. John, The Balbithan M.S. says that he got Daach from his father evidently mixing him up with his brother James whom it does not give. The 1670 M.S. says that he was a burgess of Aberdeen, but the 1600 M.S. calls him John Mackinnaught (?making naught or a ne’er do well) and says he was known as the Monk’s son having had one as a godfather. He was twice married, having had by his first wife whose name it does not give, two sons, James of Dalbochie and Mr. John, burgess in Aberdeen, killed at Pinkie [in 1547]; by his 2nd wife a sister of William Baillie, he had two other sons, John and Thomas, dwelling in Balguhain (probably as in the household of Leslie Baron of Balguhain), and two daughters, one marrying John Innes, the other marrying James Wardlaw. As no further descent is mention, other than that the daughters had issue, preseumably this line ended.

    Since it is from the M.S.S. just quoted that the genealogical accounts of the earlier descendants of John of Scurdargue and Thomas of Ruthven are mainly taken, a short description of them and of three others, as found not so important, found amongst Dr. Bulloch’s material, is given here.

    The 1644 M.S., now in the possession of Aberdeen University Library, is but a fragment of sixteen quarto pages, and jumps about between different descendants. Since it has been merged into the Balbithan M.S., it hardly requires attention.

    The 1670 M.S. existed at Gordon Castlel and was bound up with Robert Gordon of Straloch’s "Origo" and Ferrerius’ History of the Gordons. It deals with the families of Huntly, Pitlurg, Cairnburrow; Lesmoir, Craig, Haddo, Nethermuir, and the sons of Thomas of Ruthven as noted.

    The Balbithan M.S. consists of a small octavo volume of 159 pages. It was apparently compiled by James Gordon, 1st of Balbithan about the middle of the eighteenth century who added to an account by one of the Gordons of Craig. Dr. Bulloch considered it to be by far the fullest and most accurate account of the families in the north of Scotland as proved by state documents and other historical sources, and consequently adopted it as the basis of his material. It is likely that James Gordon was able to see the 1644 M.S. in its entirety and embodied it, adding later details. From its accuracy it may be suspected that it was drawn up for one of the earlier Marquiss of Hutly by one or more people who had access to documents then existing at Huntly Castle and also that a copy came to James Gordon as a family possession. As a descendant of the Cairnburrow-park family, his remarks on the legitimacy of Jock and Tam and of Jock’s eldest son come very natural and tend to show that his mat!
    erial came from the Huntly family.

    1815 and 1821 M.S.S. Bound up with the 1600 and 1670 M.S.S. in for Bulloch’s material are copies of two others dated 1815 and 1821 respectively. The first of these was written by James Mitchell, factor for Pitlour and deals exclusively with the Cairnburrow family and its branches about which it gives some details not in other M.S.S. The other, known as the Drummuir Pedigree, deals with the pitlurg down to about 1680, Carinburrow and Park. A copy was made by Mr. Ree, and some details added.

  •  

    trav.gif (1735 bytes) Copyright 1999 by Travler Designs©
    ...a web page creation and consulting firm.
    All rights reserved. ~ Revised October 18, 1999