Woody DNA Project
Discussion
This page is for
the dissemination of information relative to the Woody DNA Project. This
includes progress updates, conclusions, success stories and answers to
correspondents questions.
Click
here to join the Woody DNA Project and order a discounted yDNA
test. Y-DNA37 or Y-DNA67 are the preferred tests.
June 4, 2013 We now have 43
members in the Woody DNA Project; however, our total for yDNA tests is 39. The
other four are mtDNA and Family Finder tests. The most unexpected yDNA result
came from a descendant of Nicholas Woody (1773 - bef 1850) of Spartanburg
County, South Carolina. This result has placed his lineage in Group 3 (the Woody
Family of Old Virginia group). This came as quite a surprise since adjacent
Greenville County was the home of the family of William and Sarah Persel Woody
(Group 2) in the late 1800s. However, a Henry Woody (bef 1755 - bef 1810) was
enumerated in the 1790 and 1800 Spartanburg censuses and he was probably the
father of Nicholas. Henry had a large family including six additional males over
age sixteen in the 1800 census. We do not know the parents of Henry, but suspect
that he was a son of William Banks Woody of Henry County, Virginia or the son of
Samuel Woody of Hanover County, Virginia, who died intestate in the late 1700s.
In the early 1800s, there were several other Woodys in northwestern South
Carolina and southwestern North Carolina that have not been linked to any
established lineage and consequently
seem to be good candidates for relatives of Henry Woody of Spartanburg.
We finally have a new participant in Group 2 (William
& Sarah Persel Woody group). His yDNA is an exact match for the three other
participants in this group. Additionally, two participants that have had at
least 37 markers tested are descendants of two sons of William and Sarah, so we
now believe that this group is on a solid yDNA footing. However, the
participation in this group lags significantly behind two of the other groups
and we would like to see several more new participants and/or upgrades to 37
markers. With this success come a mystery. The yDNA of this group is a very good
match with many of the Chumley
members of the
Cholmondeley DNA Project.
Excellent sketches of the family histories of the many the different
surname variations associated with this yDNA project are at the Chumney/Chumley/Chumbley Family History web site. As far as we can discern, none of the members
of either DNA project has any record of Woody and Chumley interactions, so we
can't even hazard a guess as to the source of this connection. However,
the fact that we have exactly matching yDNA from the descendants of two sons of
William and Sarah Persel Woody means that the mystery is connected to William Woody or to an ancestor of William. Since the
William C. Berry Day Book
alleges that William was a "native of England" and that Sarah was an
"English lady", this ancestor would have likely resided in England.
August 27, 2011 We now have the the 67 marker
results from a descendant of David Woody/Brooks. Comparing these 67 marker
results to the 67 marker results of the Love descendant described below reveals
a GD=8. A GD=8 means that the semi-close 37 marker match described below
has a very high probability of being a random match and, as a consequence, the
probability of a Woody/Love connection is reduced to nearly zero. So, at
this time, we are left with an almost unique yDNA for the descendants of David
Woody/Brooks. Perhaps, in the future, other matches will be found as more and
more men have their yDNA tested. Or perhaps, traditional research will provide
more evidence relating to the ancestors of David Woody/Brooks. At any rate, we
now have a proven forth major Woody line. We anticipate that the number of
participants in this group will grow, just as two of the other groups have grown
substantially since the project was initiated in 2007.
August 18, 2011
Sometime the results of yDNA testing provide
surprising information, but that is the nature of yDNA and yDNA surname
projects. If we could forecast these results in advance, we would not have much
of a reason to do the testing and compare the results in DNA projects.
The yDNA 25 marker results of a descendant of Allan Woody, the son of
David Woody/Brooks closely matches the results of the two men mentioned
directly below. This result seems to rule out a non-paternal event that
could additionally complicate the research on David Woody/Brooks;
however, the yDNA of these men seems almost unique. Besides their own
rather close matches, there is only one other semi-close match to any surname in the FTDNA & ySearch databases. The one and only
semi-close match is to a Love descendant living in Scotland and his yDNA is in a
Love DNA Project "Unmatched Group". This is not a real close match to the two
Woodys (GD=4 & GD=5), but considering that the two Woody cousins have a GD=3, it
cannot be easily dismissed. This means that this Love yDNA is also nearly unique
and that it do not match any of the many other Love results in the Love DNA
Project. The Love descendants first known ancestor was John Love born about 1817
in Scotland and there is no record of any of his family emigrating to America.
Of course, this does not rule out the distinct possibility that an ancestor or
older relative of John did come to America. Additionally, there several Loves
living in Caswell Co., NC the late 1700s. Part of Caswell was used to create
Person Co. in 1791/1792. Because of the unique nature of these yDNA results, the
ambiguity associated with the David Woody/Brooks name and the fact that Loves were
present in the same area as Woodys , we conclude that there is a possibility
that these Woodys and Loves are somehow connected; however, this connection
could have occurred many generations before the birth of David Woody/Brooks and
long before David or his ancestors immigrated to America. It is also possible
that the Woody-Love yDNA match is merely a random event.
The
Love descendant has been tested for 67 yDNA markers. Testing of the 38-67 marker
suite for one of our Woody participants is also underway. If the two 67 marker
tests compare favorably, more emphasis will be placed on the possible Woody-Love
connection.
Although the almost total lack of significant matches across all surnames is a
rather unusual event, it certainly is not unprecedented. This event has occurred
in other yDNA projects, but it is a first for ours. Although the yDNA databases
contain hundreds of thousands of samples and are steadily growing larger, these
databases contain only a very small fraction of the total number people that are
candidates for testing. The overwhelming majority of these samples come from the
United States, so the rest of the world is even more underrepresented. Many
yDNA projects require large amounts of patience, but this patience can
result in significant genealogical dividends, sometime in ways we least expect.
Jul 8, 2011 Recently, two descendants of David Woody, aka
David Brooks, (c1755-1821) of Person Co., NC have joined the Woody DNA Project.
Their yDNA 37 marker results indicate that the two men are related
(GD=3); however, these
results are completely different from the
yDNA results for the three previously identified Woody families/groups found in
Colonial America. In addition, their yDNA is not a good match for any Brooks yDNA
in the FTDNA database. The only other match of any surname is found in the Love
DNA Project. Both of the Woody participants
descend from William Henry Woody, the son of David Woody/Brooks. David also had
several other sons: John, Aaron, Moses, James & Allen. To further investigate
this situation, we would like to know the yDNA of a descendant of one or more of
these additional sons. So we would like a descendent of one or more of these
sons to join our project. As a result of this information, we have created a new
Woody Group 4 and the "Not Grouped" category has been reduced to three
participants.
Sep 28, 2010 We are experiencing a rather slow project
participation period. The current economic situation seems to be the reason for
this situation. Overall, however, the progress progress has been successful. We
have eleven confirmed participants in the John Woody line, twelve in the Henry
Woody line and three in the William line. We also have four participants in the
"Not Grouped" category. Should we receive another match for any of the "Not
Grouped" participants, we will form a new Woody grouping.
So far, we have project members from seventeen
states: They hail from the heartland to both coasts and both borders.
Dec 15, 2008
The 37 marker results for W-15 have confirmed that
he is a descendant of John & Mary Lindley Woody. We now have four proven
descendants of John & Mary in the project and are awaiting the results of W-21,
whose paper trail suggests that he is also a descendant of this couple.
The results
of W-20 are a perfect 12 marker match with the results of two descendants of
William & Sarah Percel Woody. It would be very useful for this participant to
upgrade to 37 markers. We now have three proven descendants of William & Sarah
in the project.
The results
of W-17, a descendant of George Woody, and the results of W-18 & W19,
descendants of James Woody, show that these men share a common ancestor with the
other Woodys that have paper trails originating in Western Virginia. We now have
ten proven descendants of this common ancestor in the project and we continue
traditional research in an effort to prove this ancestor.
Sep 25, 2008
One of our recent 37 marker results is for
participant W-16. The paper trail for W-16 hit a dead end with James B. Woody
bc 1822 Tennessee and married in 1847, Roane Co., Tennessee to Prudence Mathis.
The DNA results for W-16 are a close match for those of W-4 & W-5, who are
descendants of John Woody who died 1762 in North Carolina. These results,
together with the knowledge of where and when James and Prudence were married
has narrowed the possibilities and focused the search for the parents of
James. It is very likely that his grandfather was John Woody born 1758 in North
Carolina.
We have also received the 12 marker
results for W-15 and they are an exact match for W-16, W-4 & W-5, discussed
above. Although the paper trail for W-15 is short, this match gives us a family
line and locality to focus our research. Hopefully, W-16 will upgrade to 37
markers, since these additional markers could be very useful in separating the
branches of this tree. Currently all of the sons of John Woody, born 1758, are
being researched with new focus and renewed enthusiasm. We will keep you posted
of the results.
Additionally, two descendants (W-18 &
W19) of James Woody, bc 1740, and first found in Pittsylvania Co., Virginia,
have joined the project. To our knowledge, James has never been connected to any
of the other Woody lines. He could be related to the Virginia Woodys, the North
Carolina Woodys or he could be part of another completely separate Woody line in
Colonial America.
Aug 20, 2008 Participant No. 17 has just joined the
project. He has a well established paper trail back to George Woody, bc 1790 in
Virginia. We hope his yDNA will help us shed some light on the Woodys of Western
Virginia.
Aug 7, 2008 After a long
drought, we now have two new participants (W-15 & W-16). One is using yDNA testing to
determine which of the existing Woody
lines he is associated with. The other is possibly a descendant of John & Mary
Lindley Woody (W4 and W5) but the paper trail is not
complete. The project currently has the yDNA results of two other members from
this lineage. This line is especially interesting because
the I1b haplogroup indicates a deep ancestry from Scandinavia, rather than
Western Europe. We are very glad to have these new participants;
however, we still need more participation from descendants of the William &
Sarah Percel line.
Jun 4, 2008 We now have the 37 marker results for the fifth descendant
of Henry Woody. The previous discussion was based on four descendants. As
anticipated, the average mutation rate changed slightly from .0098 to .0090. The
Average Marker Longevity changed slightly from 2.75 generations to 3.00
generations. These revised figures do not change any of the conclusions at all.
To help illustrate fast mutating markers, it is instructive to look at the
results of W-8 & W-9 on the Results Page of this project. Participants W-8 & W-9
are first cousins. The results of these two men are identical except for marker
389-2. The results show that this marker mutated in W-9 or his father. Marker
389-2 is not considered to be a fast mutating marker in the general population
May 23, 2008: We now have enough yDNA results from the Henry Woody line
to reach some interesting conclusions. The following discussion is somewhat
complicated and I have tried to condense the ideas as much as possible. In
truth, I may have over simplified the concepts and explanations; however, the
basic conclusions seem valid to me.
It is well known that DNA genetic markers mutate over time. This characteristic
is called polymorphism. The number of mutations per hundreds of generations is
called the mutation rate. In the early days of genetic studies (c. 2001), a
mutation rate of .002 or .2% was thought to be accurate. However, in 2004, FTDNA
indicated that the average mutation rate for the general population was .004 or
.4%. Note that this is the average mutation rate for all markers in the general
population. It is also well known that the mutation rates for the individual
genetic markers are not the same.
To estimate how long ago a connection between two individuals occurred, the
concept of Distance (GD) was introduced. Very basically, the GD tool uses the
number of marker differences (mutations) between individuals to estimate the
probability of the Time to the Most Recent Common Ancestor (TMRCA) in years or
generations. FamilyTreeDNA (FTDNA) has widely publicized that it uses different
mutation rates for each genetic marker when computing GD and TMRCA. Although
FTDNA does not publish the specific mutation rates, it appears that they may be
using a rate of .007 for some markers. However, most tools that compute TMRCA
use the average mutation rates for the general population, even if different
rates are used for each marker. This includes the FTDNATIP and GD tools at FTDNA.
Obviously, since each marker has an average mutation rate for the general
population, there must be rates that are higher and lower than the average. In
fact, some surname mutation rates are much higher than average and some hardly
mutate at all. Over the years, it has become apparent that the markers
associated with a very few surnames mutate at a much higher rate that for the
average population. Although this phenomenon is quite rare, it appears that the
Henry Woody line falls into this category.
Using the 37 marker data that we have accumulated for four descendants of Henry
Woody, we have calculated an average mutation rate of .0098. This translates to
an Average Marker Longevity (AML) of 2.75 generations. For 37 markers, this
means that we can expect to see, on average, a marker mutation every 2.75
generations. By way of contrast, a .002 rate would produce a 13.5 generation AML
and a mutation rate of .004 would produce a 6.67 AML.
If you look at the yDNA project results of most surnames you will see line after
line of exactly identical or very similar results for many individuals. This is
to be expected since the average mutation rate of most surname markers is .004.
This rate produces a mutation, on average, every 6/7 generations and 6/7
generations is the extent of many lineages. In contrast, the 37 marker results
for the four descendants of Henry Woody do not contain a single exact match.
This is because we can expect to see, on average, a mutation every 2.75
generations. Since most of our Henry Woody lineages are 6 generations, we can
expect to see at about two mutations for each individual during this period.
There is one online tool that calculates TMRCA and also allows the selection of
an average mutation rate. To use this tool, go to Dean McGee’s Y-Utility: Y-DNA
Comparison Utility, FTDNA Mode
http://www.mymcgee.com/tools/yutility.html?mode=ftdna_mode . Using an
average mutation rate of .0098, we have used this tool to analyze the yDNA
markers of the four descendants of Henry Woody. These results are in close
agreement with our paper trails for the four individuals.
The pioneer research on analyzing fast mutating markers was done by Charles F.
Kerchner. We have borrowed heavily from Charles’ research and used his method of
calculations to arrive at the figures in the above discussion. Those wishing to
explore this topic in more detail should start with Kerchner's DNA Testing &
Genetic Genealogy Info and Resources Page
http://www.kerchner.com/dna-info.htm. We expect these figures to change
somewhat as we accumulate more data, but we do not expect the conclusions to
change.
Conclusions:
The Henry Woody line has a very fast average mutation rate.
The DNA testing companies have not provided tools to analyze lineages with very
fast average mutation rates. This is because the number of surnames with these
rates is very small. The GD and TMRCA tools that they provide are based on the
average mutation rates of the general population and satisfy the needs of the
vast majority of surname lineages. These traditional TMRCA and GD tools have
very little value when used to analyze the DNA results of the Henry Woody line.
There is a TMRCA tool available that allows the selection of an average mutation
rate.
Feb 5, 2008: The Woody DNA Project continues to make
substantial overall progress. We now have the yDNA results of twelve people
posted on the “Results” page, with two more in the pipeline.
We have posted four new lineages and updated one.
In the William & Sarah Percel line, we have posted the results for W-11 and he
is a perfect 12 marker match with W-10. Coupled with excellent conventional
research, this match has unlocked a dead end and revealed a previously
unrecorded branch of this line. As a result, we have updated the lineage of
W-10. Since William Coffee Berry, the primary source for this line, alleges
that William & Sarah first "settled on the Potomac River in the state of
Virginia", some have speculated that they were related to the Henry Woody line.
These yDNA results show that these two lines are unrelated. However, since
Berry’s work focused mainly on the descendants of William & Sarah’s son
Jonathan, other branches of this tree may be discovered by DNA testing and
analysis. Someday the yDNA of participants to this project may be used to prove
the ancestors of William Woody in England but, in the meantime, there are
probably many more unrecorded branches in this lineage. Hopefully, this
progress will encourage Woody’s with brick walls to join our project.
Recent posted results have confirmed that William Banks Woody of Goochland &
Henry Counties, VA was very closely related to Henry Woody of Franklin Co., VA.
William died in 1817 in Lincoln Co., TN and his sons moved to Arkansas. We now
have six individuals in this grouping that are related, but not as tightly as
expected using traditional yDNA analysis. However, recent large scale DNA
studies have shown that the genes associated with some surnames mutate much
faster than the genes associated with other surnames, but only time and more
participation will determine the mutation rate of this line. On a very positive
note, our two very recent participants are descendants of different sons of
Henry. Their pending results should shine more light on this line.
Our progress with the John Woody (died circa 1758, Orange Co., NC) is currently
at a standstill. After quickly achieving a good match in this line, we have not
attracted other participants. This match resulted in proving a previously
undocumented branch of this line.
The line of John Woody is a very interesting since the associated I1b haplogroup
is rooted in Scandinavia rather than Western Europe. This suggests that this
branch of Woody’s descends from the Vikings that once ruled much of the British Isles.
Adding to this interest is the “three John theory” that postulates the early
Massachusetts Woody's as the progenitors of this line. Judging from the number
of message board postings and on-line genealogies, there seems to be no lack of
interest in this line, but it would also seem that the proponents of the “three
John theory” would be eager to move toward proving this interesting idea. I
first heard of this theory some fifteen years ago, but I haven't seen much, if
any, progress towards proof. There are no guarantees, but DNA may be the key to
extending the proven lineage of John Woody.
In less than fifteen years, the computer and the internet have become the
primary research tools used for family history study and genealogy. DNA
testing/analysis is simply another powerful research tool that is available to
those with more than a casual interest in their heritage. In a very short time,
this tool has been used by this project to open a two closed doors and to prove
a suspected connection. In my opinion, even more dramatic results will be
achieved, just as they have been achieved with other surname DNA projects. But
DNA projects take time, patience and, most of all, participation.
Jun 26, 2007 Welcome to the Woody DNA Project. My name is
Dave Woody and I have been doing family history/genealogical research on the
descendants of Henry Woody of Virginia for about fifteen years. During this time
I have corresponded with many other folks that were/are researching the various
Woody lines. I have read several theories that attempt to connect some of these
lines, but I have never seen any proof that substantiates these theories. Over
the years, several people have asked me about starting a Woody DNA Project. To
my knowledge, no such project exists, so I have initiated such an endeavor at
this site. I have scoured the internet, but have found only one posted Woody DNA
submission; a yDNA 12 marker test. The Woody DNA Project is based on yDNA marker
tests and is open to males with the Woody (Woodie, Woodey, Wooddy, Woode, etc.) surname
or any male that has an unbroken male lineage to a male Woody ancestor. I have received the results
of my yDNA 37 marker test and have posted them on the Result's Page of this
site, along with the abovementioned 12 marker test results. Also, a short
version of my pedigree is posted on the Patriarch's Page. To date, two other
yDNA kits have been ordered and I will post the results when they are available.
The genealogical benefits of DNA testing are explained in detail elsewhere on
this site.
The early stages of a DNA project can be very frustrating because of the
reluctance of candidates to invest in testing without knowing that others will
do the same. Also, the eight weeks that the laboratory requires to process the
DNA sample is a problem for some. I have been told by other DNA project
coordinators that about ten submissions are needed to achieve momentum. After
that milestone is reached, other candidates are much more willing to join the
project. So, if you are interested in your heritage, please think very seriously
about contributing to the project. If you are a female and know of an potential
male volunteer, please encourage him to join the project. Even if you can't be a
yDNA contributor, you can contribute a short pedigree or family history to this
project. The World
Families Network site has a "Listing
of Surname Projects with Over 50 Participants". There are some
extremely successful surname DNA projects on this list. Browse several of these
projects to see what can be accomplished by folks that are willing to invest in
their heritage. I am totally committed to this project, but I need your help in
making the Woody DNA Project as successful as other surname DNA projects. If
others can do it, Woody's can do it.
Dave Richards - Project Administrator & Line Leader [richardj AT gmail.com]
Dave Woody - Project Line Leader [woodydna AT live.com]
Don Woody -
Project Line Leader [donw88dy
AT gmail.com]
Revised Dec 2, 2016