Searching Your Roots
Searching Your Roots
The following document was initially created for a workshop on
Genealogy for a group of teachers and not knowing their background in doing
genealogy research this was added to the workshop as supplementary information.
Many people who now contact me via email are beginners or mid-range researchers
and to help, I refer them to this page for steps to use in doing genealogy
research. For those who are experienced genealogy researchers don't be offended,
just use the back button and escape from this info. I don't mean to offend
anyone. However, you may find some of the information important to you as well.
Many people are trying to search their Roots and are finding it
difficult because of lack of knowledge about how to go about searching in an
orderly fashion. This web-page is an attempt to give a few pointers for those
who are starting their search or need a few pointers on where they might look.
The most important thing to remember when searching for your
roots or doing any kind of research is to try and work from the known towards the
unknown. This approach will help you tremendously and keep your efforts
productive. Another very important rule is to document your findings.
This is a must both for yourself and others who need to know where you
obtained the information. Sources should be of a primary nature so that others
can verify your findings. This does not mean that you just use a source that is
known to only you or a very limited number of people. Sources do not mean where
you have filed your information as "Left drawer of file cabinet, file #23" means
absolutely nothing to anyone else but you. If that is where you have filed your
information then the source would be where you obtained the information from;
again, this does not mean from somebody else's undocumented information. Many
people think that using a source of xxxxxx.FTM (someone else's
Family Tree Maker file or other GED file) is a valid source. This is very poor as nobody can
verify this data and maybe it is completely FALSE and based only on what
that person wanted their tree to look like. You would be surprised at the amount
of bad information that exists where people have tried to force the data to fit
what they desire. Another item that you must be aware of in today's electronic
distribution of data is the fact that if you try to use data that the majority
have and leave the single entry that seems out of place, you might just be lead
astray as many people just copy information from each other and false
information spreads rapidly. Look at both sets of data and you may find that the
single entry with sources is the correct one and the others that show no or very
poor sources are the ones that are wrong.
The following segment has some linked items to show examples of
documents that I have used in my family research and also from others that I
have searched. Many of these are from scanned
documents that are shown as photographs in
Unknown
Krause Photos.
Steps to follow:
- Consider joining a local Genealogy Society and/or Special Purpose
Genealogy Society.
- Determine how you are going to record your data.
- Using paper (Family Group Sheets)[FGS]. This method is fine for those
with no computer. I don't use FGS as it would be impossible with over
112,000 persons. Modern day genealogy programs do exactly the same thing
as the older methods of using paper.
- Computer Genealogy Program. Many ask which program is the best? That
depends! What I have found is that whatever a person is used to is the
best for them. I have my own preferences and they are based on
functionality of the program and can it produce reports that can be
emailed to others. If you are limited to only paper reports then mailing
costs can become a factor when sharing your data with others.
- Start with yourself or one of your children or grandchildren if you wish
to produce a larger tree or even a small one. Don't try to jump over
generations and try to find where your ancestor came from across the waters
when you don't even know their descendants and when they arrived in the area
where you might think they lived. You must find proof for this information.
- Enter the known data for each generation starting with the first
generation. Full Names, dates of Birth and Location of Birth, Marriage date
and Location, and Deaths (full dates and locations), Place of burial
(Cemetery etc.) Enter the source of your information and what proof
you have that the data is correct. Primary Sources of data are the best.
These include Gov't/Archive Documents of records for Birth, Marriage, or
Death. Make sure you record all information from the document if you don't
have a copy for your records.
-
When you have exhausted the information on one generation (Parents and
children of that family) proceed to the grand-parents of first family.
Record all information on their children. Full names are important as the
middle name of a child may give you an indication of the names of ancestors from
either the mother or father's side of the family. Try to follow the
descendants of siblings for at least one or two generations as this may
contain very valuable information on the ancestral line that you are
following.
- Look for information in Public Libraries, Provincial/State Genealogy
Libraries, Family Bibles. Try to find the person(s) who are the "Keeper
of the Notes" on family history as they may also have old Photographs.
Personal
examples of this are at the following
pages
- Use Cemetery Tombstone information to determine dates of death and birth.
If the date of death is given as just the year then obtain the internment
records to find the date of burial. Using the burial date and local
newspapers for the area to find an obituary or notice of death for that person. This should give
the date and location of death, surviving relatives as well as deceased
ones.
- Use
Birth/Marriage/Death Indexes, if available, to determine the actual
dates and locations of the events. The parents are often given in the actual
Marriage Record recorded in the Index. The actual record must be ordered
from the necessary Archive location. This is often a Local Library that has
inter-library loan privileges with the Library. Birth Indexes are used to
order the
actual Birth Record using the same method.
- Once you have the data for a family back to an early enough date to find
them in a Census or other document then you should try and follow that
family through each earlier census to determine the names of children, their
age as reported, and place of birth. This is very useful as it may give an
indication of where the family has resided over time. If the early children
were born in a different country then you have the first generation that
came to the country you are searching in. The locations of birth for the
other children will indicate if the family has moved from one state/province
to another.
- Use Birth Records, Marriage Records(#1,
#2), and Death Records to determine the
correct dates and locations for the information found from any Census.
Census data is known for many errors in dates and spelling of names. No
proof that the person shown as the mother is the actual mother of the
children as she may be a second wife. However, census data might be more
accurate than information obtained from tombstones. The living person was
the most knowledgeable about the ages of themselves and their children.
Tombstone information might only be a best guesstimate of the birth year of
a person who people want to honor. I have seen cases where the tombstone
says died at age 104 when by the person's own declarations they would have
been 94 when they died.
- Use the microfilm or fiche available from your local LDS FHL (Chrurch of
Jesus Christ of Later Day Saints Family History Center Library). These are
primary records that have been microfilmed by the Mormon Church and can be
ordered by your local FHL (Family History Center Library). Look in
your local telephone book for "Church of Jesus Christ of Later Day Saints"
then in their list see if an entry for "Family History Center" is shown. You
don't have to be a Mormon or connected to the church in any way to use their
facilities. Rental is paid on microfilm ordered and you must use the
microfilm at their facilities. Local Public Libraries may also have
microfilm or be able to order it on inter-library loan at little or no cost
to the user.
- If your ancestor came from over-seas, find the date that they arrived and
the country they came from. Once you have this data traced back through as
much documentation that you can possibly find then try and find a
Ship List
Index that will provide information about the
Ship
List Departure information for that
family. Names, ages, and relationship to the family and where they were
from
in that country.
- Don't rush to find the data in the foreign country as most of what you
want is most likely located in the country where you are searching. Death
records will often indicate the place of birth of the person. Marriage
records will give place of birth and may include names of parents. Other
sources of this data may be from special documents that were required when
traveling abroad.
- Other sources of data that are a must for searching your ancestors
includes the following:
- Probate Records/Wills
- Land Titles Office Records
- Provincial/State Archives
- Cemetery Records
- Internment Records
- School Records
- Community History books
- Tax Records
- Military Records
- American Civil War Records. See
example
of Discharge Record for Julius Krueger.
- Special Reports and Documents produced for a local area. Usually
available at a Library in the area. Some are a real gem of information
(i.e.
Pike's
Notes for Calais Maine).
- Special Purpose Records:
- Border Crossing Records (#1)
- Land Grand Applications
- Homestead Records and Applications
- Muster Rolls
- Loyalist lists if your ancestor is a Loyalist.
- etc.
- Use of Mail, Email, and other methods of connection to others that are
searching the same families.
- Join special email or mailing groups where you can inform the group of the
names and locations of the families that you are searching. You will most
likely find that others have done a lot of searching already and have data
that can be shared. Don't just use their data as it must be checked for
accuracy and verified. Share your data with them and work as a team or
group.
- If you are using the Internet then use large databases like WorldConnect
and Ancestry.com to try and find members of your early ancestors that are
already in the database of others. Email these people to determine if what
they have is from reputable sources or you may end up with incorrect data
that someone has not researched and just made an assumption with no
documentation to show that it is a very weak proof.
- Consider Publishing your results to WorldConnect or a similar Genealogy
Database. Set the options so that you don't publish information on
living persons. You will be surprised by the contacts that you will have
from people who have the same ancestors and it also helps you to find many
of your distant relatives. When you publish, using this method, always put
the disclaimer "This is a work in Progress and may have errors
and/or missing Data. Anyone with updates is requested to contact the
contributor". You should not worry about not having your tree complete
before publishing as I know of a person who only had about 10 members of
his ancestors who were deceased and when he published the data, a person in
another country contacted him by email and he was able to help them with a
chapter in their book and they helped him to fill in data on different
branches. Families became separated and one branch went to a place unknown
to the others. If you are on that unknown branch then you can help others
who may be looking for that person who had unknown descendants. He is now a
firm believer in publishing his data and it keeps yielding results for him.
- Don't make assumptions, also known as speculation, about connections to families that you would like
to be related to as that will make your data very suspect and will not
standup to scrutiny by others. Remember to be correct and thorough!!
Speculation is defined as unproven assumptions. You must always prove your
assumptions as either true or false. If they are false then they should not
be published. Your reputation as a genealogy researcher depends on the
accuracy of your information.
- Remember to always record the full data about a source. If you have found
a family in a census then the appropriate source record should include the
following as an example: 1850 Census, Calais Twp., Washington Co., ME, Ward
4, ED#78, page 125, frame 24/136 (this last item is for online census data
available at Ancestry.com. This may change but the actual page number on the
original document will exist even on different ordering of the frames.) You
might also consider recording the Microfilm Number. Remember that this
number differs depending on the source of the Microfilm. LDS use their own
numbering system and it differs from the Archives in the
State/Province/Country.
- Verify your data and make sure that it is correct. Many people who have
data published in papers, books, and other sources have made mistakes and it
is your responsibility to check to see that it is accurate.
- One of the newer sources of information or misinformation depending on
how one interprets the results is the use of genealogy programs that seem to
do the research for you when in fact all they do is to provide you with
possibilities and it is up to you to determine if the information is valid
and useful. This is especially true for what is called OneWorldTree from
Ancestry.com and also a new feature that is in the Beta testing
stage that
professes to show the "Famous People related to ----" . It appears that this
might be more of a method to sell memberships then to give sound researched
information. However, it is still useful but the onus is on you to determine
if the information is accurate. Don't just blindly accept what is shown. The
following links show some examples of a "Famous
People report for our daughter" that shows people associated with her
maternal side and the second one for her paternal side. and an example of two different reports that show the
connection to Charles Tupper. Both of these lineages show gross errors where
the parent is born after the child. In both cases, the error is very near
the top of the listing and is easy to find.
Case 1, Lydia
Chipman(1654-1730) child of Mary Skiff (1671-1711) and
Case 2,
Annie Chamberlain(1688-), child of John Chamberlain(1760-1835).
- Sometimes the most unexpected
documents may contain info on family history and these can be of great
benefit. One example of this is the use of heir-ship property that is passed
down when someone dies without a Will and several generations later when the
property is trying to be sold then all of the living heirs have to be
contacted to have them sign-off so that someone can purchase the property
and have clear title. The following link explains some of the trial and
tribulations of such a transaction.
Eben-Getchell-Land story.
-
The
following questions pertain to the new way of doing online databases for
your ancestry and the user needs to be aware of the following items:
-
When
offered free online database entry, is there any hidden cost? Is this
just a way of advertising so that people will purchase memberships from
Ancestry.com to find their ancestors or contact others that have info on
their ancestors?
-
How safe
or secure is your data? By this I mean can you backup your data to your
computer or is it only via the online system that Ancestry.com(or other
provider) has provided?
-
Can you
delete your tree/database when you wish or is the data owned by the free
space provider? I have heard that you cannot delete it as others my have
pointers to your data so if you deleted your database then others would
be affected. The small print in the agreement may say that anything
submitted becomes the property of the free database provider.
-
Can you
produce a GED file that will allow you to port your database to your own
genealogy program when you decide that you want to enlarge your
capability? This can be a real problem when one looks at the many hours
spent over years to gather the information then find that it cannot be
transported to a different platform. An example of this is all the
sources(links to Ancestry.com images like census etc) they are only
links and any porting results in these not being included.
-
A new
feature in FTM-2012 or FTM-20XX allows one to synchronize their online
database with the database on their computer but you have to use
FTM-20XX to do this
and there seems to be dangers inherent to this if the synchronization is
ever broken then you may have to start again and now it depends on which
way the new synchronization is allowed as you may lose your data. This
is just in the growing pains period as of March 2012. I have seen some
very nice online databases with lots of notes and stories suddenly
disappear when they are synchronized. Beware and make sure you have your
databases backed up securely so that you can start over again if it does
not go according to your wishes.
- Beware of the "Green Leaves"
approach used by Ancestry.com in their online databases and also in FTM-xxxx
to show that others have information on your ancestors. These are only hints
that someone may have some information and does not prove what they have is
correct. If they do not have sources for their information then unless you
check it out to prove that it is correct then you are also using mythology
and your added data is GARBAGE!! These green leaves are often useful as they
give you a hint on where to look or the person may just have a letter or
some other private document that is the missing link needed to prove
connections between families. The onus is on you to prove that the
information is correct.
- Another major source of error
today appears to be how people use the "Place Name Authority"(PNA). When
they attempt to enter a place of Birth/Marriage/Death and the PNA cannot
find the location because it is based on a modern day map. People just
use the suggested location rather then the correct one and this leads to
errors. This is especially true for the area of Europe that was the border between Germany and Poland
prior to WWII and is now within the area of Poland and the previous German
names have been replaced by Polish ones. The other thing is that the names
are from maps that are 1:100,000 (1 cm = 1 KM) or 1 inch = 1.56 miles) which
is a far greater magnification then found in the PNA maps.
- Persons using Ancestry.com are
also warned of the following method used that often gives false information
to users:
- When I do a search on
Ancestry.com that shows information for a person in my database and the
dates of Birth/Marriage/Death sort of match what I have but are very
specific then the persons showing this data have either copied my data
or have used info presented by Ancestry.com that they have gathered from
my database. An example of this is the date of death of my
Great-grandfather, Johann/John Krause. When his family left West Prussia
in Sept 1884 his wife Caroline was a widow and her youngest child was 11
month old according to the ship list showing age at arrival in New York
. Using some calculations that would put the time of conception at about
20 months prior to 11 Oct 1884 which gives a date of death sometime from
Feb 1883 to Sept 1884 when the ship left Hamburg. Some people show a
date of death of Sept 1884. At one time I had that he died Bef Sept 1884
but the Bef got dropped by someone and just the Sept 1884 was shown.
This shows that
people just copy blindly accepting it as fact when it is more fiction!!
- When you find several
databases that show a given date of B/M/D then look at the details in
each one to see if anyone reports the date as Bef/Aft and the date
shown. Beware that the ones that show the specific date have probably
copied from someone that just forgot to put in the prefixes of Bef/Aft
etc.
- One of the worst that I have
come across is where the book "Maine Families in the 1790 Census" shows
that Twin-A and Twin-B children of Emerson Jackson died on 22 Jan 1902.
After searching extensively for these children in any records, they were
found in the Internment Records for the St. Stephen Rural Cemetery and
the wording is "child of Emerson Jackson" was buried on that day. Since
my wife had a photo of these two children that supposedly were still-born
then they must have died prior to 22 Jan 1902 but the published book
used my information and left out the Bef. So watch for data from sources
that you think should be correct when they are not. The
onus is on you to check it out and prove it is correct.
- It is becoming evident that many
new researchers are having a hard time trying to differentiate between
fact and fiction according to some of the Trees that I see on Ancestry.com.
They have the parents of a child born after the date of birth of the child
and have families mixed together. they attribute this to the fact that their
search using Ancestry.com indicated these suggestions. Since they are new at
genealogy then they accept the hints as facts and enter it into their
database which gives GARBAGE genealogy. What these people need to do is to
reply to their emails and notes posted on their individuals that try to tell
them what they have is wrong. Work together with others to try and publish
only fact and not fiction. Do NOT speculate, it is better to enter what you
think might be an ancestral family but do it as a separate family and do not
connect your line to it until you have proven that you have the correct
family. Using this method there will be less spreading of false information
than what we have at the present time.
- Beware of using other people's
trees as your source of information. The tree may be based on speculation
and now you are using GARBAGE genealogy to extend your tree. If you use
someone else's data then you need to prove that your line is truely descended
from the line you are connecting it to. This can be done by using
Y-Chromosome DNA analysis to prove that the Haplogoup is not different. If
the Haplogroup is different then your line does not connect to the tree that
you suspect is part of yours. Even if the Haplogroup is the same, you will
need at least 37-Markers to prove that you are a close genetic distance from
the other person who is a descendant of the other tree. Since Y-Chromosome
DNA cannot be used to connect a specific person to a specific set of parents
then you will have to use Autosomal DNA tests to do this. A test called
Family Finder DNA test from FTDNA
is the way you can prove the connection provided that it is within 7
generations of the persons being tested. You will need to test descendants of
your tree as well as a person from the other tree. You may require
assistance in analyzing the Family finder results as they are not simple to
understand. When you use someone
else's tree then you need to do as much work to find the proofs and sources.
Contact the person who has the other tree and find out what their sources
were for their information. Failure to do this can lead to you wasting a lot
of your time.
- As an example of how speculation
can give rise to GARBAGE genealogy data, I give the following example of
what happened to me. I received an email from a person that I will call
person A, this person said that they were just speculating in the attached
report, now I will be person B. This same report was sent to person C but
without any indication of the speculation so they assumed it was correct and
entered it into their database using A as the source. Once person C had this
in their database then person A used them as the source so both of these
databases had sources but it was based on speculation and was GARBAGE
genealogy. It has taken years to try and get rid of this as these databases
were published and others used this same info and it spread like a
wild-fire. In fact, this error still exists today and is published by person
A.
- The following is a special
WARNING directed to all users and especially to people just trying to get
started in family history research. The internet today is both good but it
is also very bad as it allows people to start doing genealogy research but
they have nobody to turn to for help like in the old days when you had to go
the a library or archives to find your information. The old method allowed
you to talk to others and learn from them as to what you should do and how
to go about learning how to do research. Today, if you buy a membership in
Ancestry.com or any other genealogy company then you can get started and
there may be all sorts of hints( sometimes called shakey leaves) that try to
give you hints as to the ancestor of the person that you have. The problem
with these hints is that you have to be a very seasoned genealogy researcher
to know if the hint is for real or is just garbage information. In fact, you
need to know the answer to be able to identify if the hint is for real or
not. I see many cases where people show all sorts of sources for a person
but the person they show is not the correct one as they didn't know who the
correct person was. This is where it takes many years of research and
colaboration with others to determine if you have the correct person. The
best thing you can do is to contact others that are searching this same line
and work as a group to see if what you have found is correct or or not. This
can also lead to problems as I have seen one person(A) show one answer and
nine others(B1..9) show a completely different answer. In this case, it is
important to contact these people to determine all the facts because the
nine may have all copied the results of B1 and that information was based on
speculation with no sources or supporting documentation while person A has
evidence to prove that their solution is correct. It is not easy and you
need to cooperate with each other. In many cases today, people will not even
respond to you when you try to contact them as they want to hide behind a
barrier and not defend what they have as they have no sources or evidence
and they don't want to admit they copied the information form someone else.
In my case, if a person show sources and when I look at these sources they
are correct for the person in question, then I use that source information
for my evidence. If no sources are shown, then if I trust the database that
has the information, then I may copy the information but show no source as
the person who had the data showed no source and call his unsubstantiated
data that needs to be checked to prove that it is correct or not. Not an
easy task and takes many hours of serious research to determine the correct
answers.
Good Luck in your searching.
You may now use the return button to go back to the previous page.
A. E. Krause
Last modified:
02 August, 2021