PERRY COUNTY, ALABAMA
LARGEST SLAVEHOLDERS FROM 1860 SLAVE CENSUS SCHEDULES
and
SURNAME MATCHES FOR AFRICAN AMERICANS ON 1870 CENSUS
Transcribed by Tom Blake, February, 2002
PURPOSE. Published information giving names of slaveholders and numbers of slaves held in Perry County, Alabama, in 1860, is either non-existent or not readily available. It is possible to locate a free person on the Perry County, Alabama census for 1860 and not know whether that person was also listed as a slaveholder on the slave census, because published indexes almost always do not include the slave census.
Those who have found a free ancestor on the 1860 Perry County, Alabama census can check this list to learn if their
ancestor was one of the larger slaveholders in the County. If the ancestor is not on this list, the 1860 slave census microfilm
can be viewed to find out whether the ancestor was a holder of a fewer number of slaves or not a slaveholder at all.
Whether or not the ancestor is found to have been a slaveholder, a viewing of the slave census will provide an informed
sense of the extent of slavery in the ancestral County, particularly for those who have never viewed a slave census. An
ancestor not shown to hold slaves on the 1860 slave census could have held slaves on an earlier census, so those films can be
checked also. In 1850, the slave census was also separate from the free census, but in earlier years it was a part of the free
census. African American descendants of persons who were enslaved in Perry County, Alabama in 1860, if they have an idea of the
surname of the slaveholder, can check this list for the surname. If the surname is found, they can then view the microfilm for
the details listed regarding the sex, age and color of the slaves. If the surname is not on this list, the microfilm can be viewed
to see if there were smaller slaveholders with that surname. To check a master surname list for other States and Counties,
return to Home and Links Page. The information on surname matches of 1870 African Americans and 1860 slaveholders is intended merely to provide data
for consideration by those seeking to make connections between slaveholders and former slaves. Particularly in the case of
these larger slaveholders, the data seems to show in general not many freed slaves in 1870 were using the surname of their
1860 slaveholder. However, the data should be checked for the particular surname to see the extent of the matching. The last U.S. census slave schedules were enumerated by County in 1860 and included 393,975 named persons holding
3,950,546 unnamed slaves, or an average of about ten slaves per holder. The actual number of slaveholders may be slightly
lower because some large holders held slaves in more than one County and they would have been counted as a separate
slaveholder in each County. Excluding slaves, the 1860 U.S. population was 27,167,529, with about 1 in 70 being a
slaveholder. It is estimated by this transcriber that in 1860, slaveholders of 200 or more slaves, while constituting less than 1
% of the total number of U.S. slaveholders, or 1 out of 7,000 free persons, held 20-30% of the total number of slaves in the
U.S. The process of publication of slaveholder names beginning with larger slaveholders will enable naming of the holders
of the most slaves with the least amount of transcription work. The last U.S. census slave schedules were enumerated by County in 1860 and included 393,975 named persons holding
3,950,546 unnamed slaves, or an average of about ten slaves per holder. The actual number of slaveholders may be slightly
lower because some large holders held slaves in more than one County and they would have been counted as a separate
slaveholder in each County. Excluding slaves, the 1860 U.S. population was 27,167,529, with about 1 in 70 being a
slaveholder. It is estimated by this transcriber that in 1860, slaveholders of 200 or more slaves, while constituting less than 1
% of the total number of U.S. slaveholders, or 1 out of 7,000 free persons, held 20-30% of the total number of slaves in the
U.S. The process of publication of slaveholder names beginning with larger slaveholders will enable naming of the holders
of the most slaves with the least amount of transcription work. SOURCES. The 1860 U.S. Census Slave Schedules for Perry County, Alabama (NARA microfilm series M653, Roll 34)
reportedly includes a total of 18,206 slaves, which ranks as the 6th highest total in the State and the 14th highest in the U.S.
in 1860. This transcription includes 148 slaveholders who held 34 or more slaves in Perry County, accounting for 10,058
slaves, or 55% of the County total. The rest of the slaves in the County were held by a total of 897 slaveholders, and those
slaveholders have not been included here. Due to variable film quality, handwriting interpretation questions and inconsistent
counting and page numbering methods used by the census enumerators, interested researchers should view the source film
personally to verify or modify the information in this transcription for their own purposes. Census data for 1860 was
obtained from the Historical United States Census Data Browser, which is a very detailed, searchable and highly
recommended database that can found at http://fisher.lib.virginia.edu/census/ . Census data on African Americans in the
1870 census was obtained using Heritage Quest's CD "African-Americans in the 1870 U.S. Federal Census", available
through Heritage Quest at http://www.heritagequest.com/ . FORMAT. This transcription lists the names of those largest slaveholders in the County, the number of slaves they held in
the County, the name of the locality and the first census page on which they were listed. The page numbers used are the
rubber stamped numbers in the upper right corner of every set of two pages, with the previous stamped number and a "B"
being used to designate the pages without a stamped number. Unfortunately, many of the pages for Perry County were
filmed out of sequence, but this transcription gives the beginning and end pages for the holders affected. Following the
holder list is a separate list of the surnames of the holders with information on numbers of African Americans on the 1870
census who were enumerated with the same surname. The term "County" is used to describe the main subdivisions of the
State by which the census was enumerated. TERMINOLOGY. Though the census schedules speak in terms of "slave owners", the transcriber has chosen to use the
term "slaveholder" rather than "slave owner", so that questions of justice and legality of claims of ownership need not be
addressed in this transcription. Racially related terms such as African American, black, mulatto and colored are used as in
the source or at the time of the source, with African American being used otherwise. PLANTATION NAMES. Plantation names were not shown on the census. Using plantation names to locate ancestors
can be difficult because the name of a plantation may have been changed through the years and because the sizeable number
of large farms must have resulted in lots of duplication of plantation names. In Alabama in 1860 there were 482 farms of
1,000 acres or more, the largest size category enumerated in the census, and another 1,359 farms of 500-999 acres. Linking
names of plantations in this County with the names of the large holders on this list should not be a difficult research task, but
it is beyond the scope of this transcription. FORMER SLAVES. The 1860 U.S. Census was the last U.S. census showing slaves and slaveholders. Slaves were
enumerated in 1860 without giving their names, only their sex and age and indication of any handicaps, such as deaf or blind
Slaves 100 years of age or older were supposed to be named on the 1860 slave schedule, but there were only 1,570 slaves of
such age enumerated, out of a total of 3,950,546 slaves nationwide. Though not specifically looking for these older slaves,
the transcriber did not notice any such slaves named in this county, except for 100 year old female Tempy held by A. J. Pool
on page 479B, and 110 year male Corker and 107 year female Amey both held by W. G. England at page 491. Freed slaves,
if listed in the next census, in 1870, would have been reported with their full name, including surname. Some of these
former slaves may have been using the surname of their 1860 slaveholder at the time of the 1870 census and they may have
still been living in the same State or County. Before presuming an African American was a slave on the 1860 census, the
free census for 1860 should be checked, as almost 11% of African Americans were enumerated as free in 1860, with about
half of those living in the southern States. Estimates of the number of former slaves who used the surname of a former
owner in 1870, vary widely and from region to region. If an African American ancestor with one of these surnames is found
on the 1870 census, then making the link to finding that ancestor as a slave requires advanced research techniques involving
all obtainable records of the holder. MIGRATION OF FORMER SLAVES: According to U.S. Census data, the 1860 Perry County population included
9,479 whites, 39 "free colored" and 18,206 slaves. By the 1870 census, the white population of Perry County had
decreased about 25% to 7,142, while the "colored" population decreased only about 2% to 17,833. (As a side note, by
1960, 100 years later, the County was listed as having 5,943 whites, about 37% less than 100 years earlier, and the 1960
total of 11,401 "Negroes"was also about 37% less than what the colored population had been 100 years before.) Where did
the freed slaves go who did not stay in this county? Dallas, Montgomery and Mobile counties in Alabama all saw increases
in the colored population between 1860 and 1870, so that could be where some of these Alabama freed slaves went.
Between 1860 and 1870, the Alabama colored population increased by 37,000, to 475,000, a 17% increase. It should be
noted however, that in comparing census data for 1870 and 1960, the transcriber did not take into consideration any relevant
changes in county boundaries. Where did freed Alabama slaves go if they did not stay in Alabama? States that saw significant increases in colored
population during that time, and were therefore more likely possible places of relocation for colored persons from Perry
County, included the following: Georgia, up 80,000 to 545,000 (17%); Texas, up 70,000 (38%); North Carolina, up 31,000
(8%); Florida, up 27,000 (41%); Ohio, up 26,000 (70%); Indiana, up 25,000 (127%); and Kansas up from 265 to 17,000
(6,400%). SLAVEHOLDER LIST: ABERCROMBIE, Thos., 35 slaves, Pinetuck, page 417 ADAMS, R. H., 92 slaves, Woodville, page 485B ALEXANDER, Josiah, 38 slaves, Oak Grove, page 410B ALLEN, Wm., 52 slaves, Scotts, page 440 BARRON, John, 74 slaves, Scotts, page 435 BATES, F. A., 42 slaves, Western Div. of Hamburg, page 457B BATES, John, 40 slaves, Woodville, page 497 BATES, Robert, 90 slaves, Western Div. of Hamburg, page 455B BELL, Wm. & F., 129 slaves, Woodville, page 496 BENNERS, Augustus, 82 slaves, Scotts, page 444 BENNETT, M. C., 59 slaves, Woodville, page 482B BEST, C., 61 slaves, Western Div. of Marion, page 461 BILLINGSLY, Isaac [includes T. ___? Plantation], 132 slaves, Scotts, page 453 BOOKER, W. M., 51 slaves, Woodville, page 473B BOYD, D. A., 52 slaves, Woodville, page 486 BRAND, Bryant, 53 slaves, Pol Cat, page 421 BROWN, J. L., 80 slaves, Woodville, page 492 BURNET, T. H., 38 slaves, Woodville, page 476 CARLISLE, R. C., 49 slaves, Severe, page 409B ends on 430 CHAMBERS, J. L., 53 slaves, Woodville, page 488 CHRISTIAN, Robert, 37 slaves, Scotts, page 449B CLARKE, B., 43 slaves, Woodville, page 475 COCK, Wodson, 70 slaves, Western Div. of Hamburg, page 455 COLE, J. G., 88 slaves, Western Div. of Marion, page 464 COLE, Wm., 71 slaves, Western Div. of Marion, page 463B COLEMAN, T. R., 40 slaves, Woodville, page 479B CRENSHAW, J. W., 93 slaves, Western Div. of Hamburg, page 458B CROOM, T. H. Est., 38 slaves, Scotts, page 445B CURRY, Jabez, Home Place, 96 slaves, Scotts, page 435B CURRY, Jabez, on __? Plantation, 69 slaves, Scotts, page 432B DANIEL, Moses H., 47 slaves, Severe Beat, page 409 DAVIS, Hugh, 66 slaves, Hamburg, page 414B ends on 389 DEYAMPERT, J. L.?, 68 slaves, Oak Grove, page 414B DEYAMPERT, T. J. C., at his Midway place, 93 slaves, Scotts, page 451B DEYAMPERT, T. J. C., at his home place, 65 slaves, Scotts, page 451B DEYAMPERT, T.? J. C. Home Place, 78 slaves, Scotts, page 440 DRAKE, Gastin, 57 slaves, Scotts, page 449 DRISKELL, Thos. S., 40 slaves, Planterville, [page 419B DRIVER, J. C., 37 slaves, Scotts, page 442 ERVIN, Wm., 39 slaves, Scotts, page 434B EVANS, J. G., 67 slaves, Western Div. of Marion, page 462 EVANS, Joseph, 36 slaves, Pol Cat, page 423B FOSTER, R., 83 slaves, Jericho, page 398B FULLER, A., Est. of decd., 75 slaves, Perryville, page 416B ends on 410 GOREE, S. E.?, 42 slaves, Western Div. of Hamburg, page 456 HARPER, Benj. A., 44 slaves, Pol Cat, page 423 HARRISON, T. H., 35 slaves, Woodville, page 499 HATCH, A., 123 slaves, Scotts, page 443 HATCH, A. P., 52 slaves, Scotts, page 442B HEARD, Thos. A., 50 slaves, Heards, page 417B ends on 393 HOGUE, D. S., 36 slaves, Pol Cat, page 422 HOGUE, John Sen., 82 slaves, Pol Cat, page 423B HOGUE, John Jr., 50 slaves, Scotts, page 438 HOGUE, John, 46 slaves, Scotts, page 438 HOLMES, A., 98 slaves, Woodville, page 481B HOLMES, Benj., 37 slaves, Scotts, page 439B HOPPER, J. T., 34 slaves, Scotts, page 438B HORNBUCKLE, Wm., 59 slaves, Town of Marion, page 403 HUDSON, A. G., 62 slaves, Woodville, page 495 HUDSON, P. P., 45 slaves, Woodville, page 475B HUFF, Donalson, 56 slaves, Western Div. of Hamburg, page 499B HUNGERFORD, W. H., 73 slaves, Woodville, page 494 IVIE, Elisha, 38 slaves, Pol Cat, page 422B JAMERSON, H. Est., J. W. Cook Exr., 43 slaves, Jericho, page 405 JAMISON, Henry, 45 slaves, Scotts, page 434B JEFFERS, J. M., 57 slaves, Woodville, page 497B JONES, O. T., 50 slaves, Hamburg, page 389B JONES, Robt. T., 90 slaves, Town of Marion, page 401B KING, E. F. Est., Home Plantation, 61 slaves, Marion Beat, page 407 KING, E. W., 95 slaves, Western Div. of Hamburg, page 459 KING, E. D., Perry Plantation, 59 slaves, Jericho, page 395 KING, E. F. Est., 51 slaves, Hamburg, page 391B KING, E., 47 slaves, Woodville, page 482B KING, Gen. E. V.?, 48 slaves, Western Div. of Hamburg, page 457 KING, Porter, 80 slaves, Scotts, page 448 LAPSLEY, W. M., 50 slaves, Woodville, page 489B LEE, C. W., 98 slaves, Woodville, page 497B LEE, David, 60 slaves, Scotts, page 400B ends on 432 LEE, J. & R., 88 slaves, Scotts, page 452B LEE, J. H., 46 slaves, Western Div. of Hamburg, page 456B LEE, John, 97 slaves, Scotts, page 436 MAHAN, A., 45 slaves, Perryville, page 420B ends on 415 MARISETT, John, 43 slaves, Scotts, page 448B MARTAIN, G. M., 50 slaves, Woodville, page 489B MCGEHEE, J. W., 150 slaves, Woodville, page 484 MCLAUGHLIN, S. G., 40 slaves, Jericho, page 399B MIREE, W. S., 44 slaves, Perryville, page 416 MOORE, A. B., 33 slaves, Western Div. of Marion, page 463 MOORE, C. H., 67 slaves, Scotts, page 437 MOORE, Remilus? W., 74 slaves, Scotts, page 444B MORGAN, Wm., 35 slaves, Woodville, page 490 MORTON, Joseph W., 49 slaves, Pinetuck, page 417B MUCKLE, Willia, 61 slaves, Radfordsville, page 425B NICOLSON, R. W., 87 slaves, Woodville, page 487 OTEY, A. H., 82 slaves, Woodville, page 485 PACK, James T., 45 slaves, Hamburg, page 390B PARKER, King, 74 slaves, Western Div. of Marion, page 465B PATTON, S. L., 47 slaves, Western Div. of Marion, page 471 PEEPLES, R. R., 40 slaves, Planterville, page 419 PERRY, H. W., 37 slaves, Marion Beat, page 406 PERRY, P.? P.?, 76 slaves, Oak Grove, page 411 PHILLIPS, C. T., 42 slaves, Western Div. of Marion, page 466B PHILLIPS, J. B., 63 slaves, Woodville, page 491B PITTS, D. W., 50 slaves, Woodville, page 488 PITTS, P. H., 75 slaves, Woodville, page 494B POOL, A. J., 101 slaves, Woodville, page 479B POOL, J. K. C. Est. of, 69 slaves, Hamburg, page 391B POOL, R. R., Quarter, 73 slaves, Scotts, page 450B POOL, S. K. C., 98 slaves, Woodville, page 472 POPE, A. L., 58 slaves, Woodville, page 481 PRICE, J. L., 108 slaves, Western Div. of Marion, page 468B RANDOLPH, Jane, 94 slaves, Scotts, page 432 RICHARDSON, Wm. H., 62 slaves, Marion Beat, page 407B RUTLEDGE, Spencer, 115 slaves, Radfordsville, page 425 SACKETT, Napoleon, 126 slaves, Severe, page 430B SANDERS, G. B., 57 slaves, Western Div. of Marion, page 463 SANDERS, John, 45 slaves, Jericho, page 398 SANDERS, [surname only], 112 slaves, Jericho (and Pol Cat), page 424B ends on 396 SCOTT, J. M.?, 66 slaves, Scotts, page 439 SCOTT, James, 54 slaves, Scotts, page 445 SCOTT, S. M., Estate of desd. By J. M. Scott Admr., 40 slaves, Scotts, page 439 SELDON, Joe, 80 slaves, Woodville, page 486B SEWELL, M. E., Quarter, 86 slaves, Scotts, page 446B SHERRILL, A. M., 41 slaves, Jericho, page 400 SHIELD, Edwin, 58 slaves, Woodville, page 495B STEEL, W. G., 39 slaves, Woodville, page 474B STOLENRECK, H. A., 70 slaves, Scotts, page 448B STONE, see Stodemire & Stone STOUDEMIRE & STONE, 40 slaves, Jericho, page 405B TAIT, A. 82 slaves, Woodville, page 477B TALBERT, E. J., 68 slaves, Woodville, page 483B TARRY, J. P., 56 slaves, Western Div. of Hamburg, page 456B TAYLOE, E. T., 104 slaves, Woodville, page 474 TAYLOE, W.? H., 152 slaves, Woodville, page 478 TUBB, Elisha, 39 slaves, Jericho, page 400 UNDERWOOD, James, 88 slaves, Western Div. of Marion, page 460 VAUGHAN, S. W., [includes Roshell, Silver Creek and Goshen Places], 168 slaves, Oak Grove, page 113 WALKER, T. A., 38 slaves, Woodville, page 491B WALLACE, J. Y., 59 slaves, Scotts, page 440B WALLACE, M.? H., 40 slaves, Scotts, page 437 WALLACE, S. T., 54 slaves, Scotts, page 436B WALTHALL, J. N., 102 slaves, Scotts, page 433B WALTHALL, John, 64 slaves, Scotts, page 433 WALTHALL, P. J. K., P. C. Winn Admr., 80 slaves, Scotts, page 442 WALTHALL, T. M., 114 slaves, Scotts, page 447 WALTHALL, T. N., 86 slaves, Scotts, page 446B WARE, T. T., 74 slaves, Woodville, page 488B WARE, T. T.?, 83 slaves, Woodville, page 493B WARE, Wm., 68 slaves, Woodville, page 495B WEBB, J. H. Y., 67 slaves, Scotts, page 446 WHITE, J. M., 64 slaves, Scotts, page 451 WINFIELD, Mary, 42 slaves, Radfordsville, page 429 WOODFIN, E. B., 77 slaves, Woodville, page 476B WYATT, Wm. N., 63 slaves, Town of Marion, page 403B SURNAME MATCHES AMONG AFRICAN AMERICANS ON 1870 CENSUS: (exact surname spellings only are reported, no spelling variations or soundex) (SURNAME, # in US, in State, in County, born in State, born and living in State, born in State and living in County) ABERCROMBIE, 66, 34, 0, 28, 25, 0 ADAMS, 4295, 384, 8, 334, 232, 5 ALEXANDER, 3460, 332, 5, 281, 186, 4 ALLEN, 6198, 540, 13, 508, 323, 4 BARRON, 141, 32, 9, 25, 21, 6 BATES, 960, 169, 34, 138, 101, 19 BELL, 4784, 485, 28, 388, 280, 17 BENNERS, 8, 3, 0, 1, 1, 0 BENNETT, 1319, 148, 21, 114, 87, 15 BEST, 248, 11, 0, 10, 9, 0 BILLINGSLY, 87, 39, 34, 23, 21, 20 BOOKER, 1338, 86, 7, 76, 49, 5 BOYD, 1905, 218, 9, 171, 133, 4 BRAND, 98, 18, 10, 14, 9, 8 BROWN, 27013, 1585, 25, 1321, 878, 17 BURNET, 123, 17, 5, 13, 12, 2 CARLISLE, 124, 66, 9, 50, 46, 5 CHAMBERS, 1237, 136, 13, 118, 84, 10 CHRISTIAN, 786, 106, 7, 89, 66, 5 CLARKE, 641, 64, 1, 51, 33, 0 COCK, 45, 7, 0, 6, 4, 0 COLE, 2004, 177, 43, 167, 108, 19 COLEMAN, 4329, 483, 14, 414, 291, 7 CRENSHAW, 366, 135, 29, 84, 77, 13 CROOM, 158, 71, 3, 40, 39, 1 CURRY, 936, 231, 28, 173, 142, 19 DANIEL, 1765, 230, 9, 173, 144, 6 DAVIS, 13725, 1122, 23, 1004, 698, 19 DEYAMPERT, 29, 29, 25, 14, 14, 11 DRAKE, 647, 140, 9, 87, 72, 4 DRISKELL, 20, 8, 0, 3, 3, 0 DRIVER, 216, 29, 11, 31, 21, 9 ERVIN, 221, 20, 1, 14, 9, 0 EVANS, 3275, 311, 38, 274, 184, 26 FOSTER, 2611, 408, 21, 291, 242, 14 FULLER, 832, 123, 25, 92, 73, 16 GOREE, 50, 28, 18, 20, 18, 10 HARPER, 1363, 121, 15, 126, 72, 11 HARRISON, 3639, 349, 3, 320, 220, 1 HATCH, 187, 20, 1, 9, 8, 0 HEARD, 357, 48, 11, 48, 24, 7 HOGUE, 41, 6, 0, 9, 5, 0 HOLMES, 2804, 174, 44, 122, 82, 22 HOPPER, 125, 10, 3, 10, 7, 2 HORNBUCKLE, 7, 3, 3, 1, 1, 1 HUDSON, 1291, 150, 23, 148, 90, 14 HUFF, 361, 21, 8, 20, 9, 5 HUNGERFORD, 30, 5, 3, 4, 4, 2 IVIE, 21, 6, 6, 5, 4, 4 JAMERSON, 35, 7, 0, 1, 0, 0 JAMISON, 217, 11, 0, 19, 6, 0 JEFFERS, 116, 5, 0, 3, 2, 0 JONES, 27193, 2497, 69, 2125, 1451, 39 KING, 4979, 681, 67, 545, 406, 28 LAPSLEY, 24, 11, 3, 6, 6, 1 LEE, 6357, 644, 91, 490, 371, 54 MAHAN, 44, 6, 5, 7, 3, 2 MARISETT, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MARTAIN, 27, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0 MCGEHEE, 185, 24, 0, 16, 14, 0 MCLAUGHLIN, 95, 6, 0, 8, 4, 0 MIREE, 5, 5, 3, 5, 5, 3 MOORE, 8698, 1016, 88, 917, 635, 62 MORGAN, 2507, 226, 9, 191, 129, 5 MORTON, 1174, 65, 1, 61, 47, 0 MUCKLE, 9, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0 NICOLSON, 11, 2, 0, 2, 2, 0 OTEY, 73, 9, 4, 5, 4, 3 PACK, 77, 18, 15, 7, 4, 3 PARKER, 4448, 353, 13, 287, 203, 7 PATTON, 675, 144, 0, 145, 100, 0 PEEPLES, 111, 42, 1, 37, 36, 1 PERRY, 2432, 279, 33, 224, 162, 12 PHILLIPS, 19974, 300, 12, 252, 182, 8 PITTS, 649, 110, 20, 77, 57, 11 POOL, 572, 101, 24, 78, 56, 15 POPE, 989, 165, 15, 121, 97, 7 PRICE, 2888, 164, 7, 132, 79, 4 RANDOLPH, 979, 41, 1, 35, 20, 1 RICHARDSON, 3741, 341, 5, 301, 201, 2 RUTLEDGE, 252, 47, 27, 31, 24, 17 SACKETT, 8, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 SANDERS, 3090, 345, 50, 294, 199, 31 SCOTT, 8407, 565, 69, 473, 322, 41 SELDON, 72, 4, 0, 2, 2, 0 SEWELL, 273, 32, 15, 25, 19, 8 SHERRILL, 60, 3, 0, 3, 3, 0 SHIELD, 43, 2, 0, 5, 2, 0 STEEL, 335, 33, 1, 29, 18, 0 STOLENRECK, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 STONE, 1070, 121, 1, 94, 72, 0 STOUDEMIRE, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 TAIT, 50, 32, 0, 21, 21, 0 TALBERT, 220, 27, 0, 25, 22, 0 TARRY, 64, 15, 10, 7, 7, 6 TAYLOE, 12, 4, 0, 1, 1, 0 TUBB, 45, 8, 2, 4, 3, 1 UNDERWOOD, 444, 122, 34, 87, 77, 20 VAUGHAN, 480, 69, 14, 50, 46, 5 WALKER, 8492, 827, 19, 727, 474, 7 WALLACE, 2315, 189, 36, 155, 108, 25 WALTHALL, 45, 21, 19, 15, 15, 13 WARE, 998, 212, 25, 146, 123, 16 WEBB, 1752, 167, 5, 128, 94, 4 WHITE, 9567, 693, 38, 622, 406, 23 WINFIELD, 252, 8, 4, 9, 5, 3 WOODFIN, 57, 17, 11, 10, 9, 6 WYATT, 548, 44, 7, 43, 28, 5 Listing of all 1860 Perry County Slaveholders by J. Hugh LeBaron
Perry County 1860 Free Census transcription by J. Hugh LeBaron
You are the visitor to this page.
Those who have found a free ancestor on the 1860 Perry County, Alabama census can check this list to learn if their ancestor was one of the larger slaveholders in the County. If the ancestor is not on this list, the 1860 slave census microfilm can be viewed to find out whether the ancestor was a holder of a fewer number of slaves or not a slaveholder at all. Whether or not the ancestor is found to have been a slaveholder, a viewing of the slave census will provide an informed sense of the extent of slavery in the ancestral County, particularly for those who have never viewed a slave census. An ancestor not shown to hold slaves on the 1860 slave census could have held slaves on an earlier census, so those films can be checked also. In 1850, the slave census was also separate from the free census, but in earlier years it was a part of the free census.
African American descendants of persons who were enslaved in Perry County, Alabama in 1860, if they have an idea of the surname of the slaveholder, can check this list for the surname. If the surname is found, they can then view the microfilm for the details listed regarding the sex, age and color of the slaves. If the surname is not on this list, the microfilm can be viewed to see if there were smaller slaveholders with that surname. To check a master surname list for other States and Counties, return to Home and Links Page.
The information on surname matches of 1870 African Americans and 1860 slaveholders is intended merely to provide data for consideration by those seeking to make connections between slaveholders and former slaves. Particularly in the case of these larger slaveholders, the data seems to show in general not many freed slaves in 1870 were using the surname of their 1860 slaveholder. However, the data should be checked for the particular surname to see the extent of the matching.
The last U.S. census slave schedules were enumerated by County in 1860 and included 393,975 named persons holding 3,950,546 unnamed slaves, or an average of about ten slaves per holder. The actual number of slaveholders may be slightly lower because some large holders held slaves in more than one County and they would have been counted as a separate slaveholder in each County. Excluding slaves, the 1860 U.S. population was 27,167,529, with about 1 in 70 being a slaveholder. It is estimated by this transcriber that in 1860, slaveholders of 200 or more slaves, while constituting less than 1 % of the total number of U.S. slaveholders, or 1 out of 7,000 free persons, held 20-30% of the total number of slaves in the U.S. The process of publication of slaveholder names beginning with larger slaveholders will enable naming of the holders of the most slaves with the least amount of transcription work.