by Francis Chute, September, 2006 |
---|
Why Boulogne? | Philip's Achievement |
The Attacks Before The Siege | Historical Sources |
The Siege | Summary of the English Forces |
The man who glares out icily from the oldest portrait at The Vyne, was a war hero who restored his family's fortunes for 200 years. Yet until recently, all we knew from the reference books was that the King rewarded Philip with heraldic honour for his "valour at the Siege of Boulogne in 1544", and gave him lifetime governorship of Camber Castle on the Kent coast. In the last few years, however, we have researched manuscripts of that date; what emerges is a story well worth the telling.
The first great discovery was that Henry VIII also gave Philip a gemstone from his royal ring - a supreme accolade indeed, from a king who chopped his courtiers' heads off for failing to solve his personal problems. Philip's military superior Edward Rogers received no reward after Boulogne, which confirms (not that confirmation is needed) that Philip's valour was individual, not mere participation. Next, we note that Philip's captaincy of Camber was never interrupted at a change of sovereign, though when new kings/queens were crowned, it was normal for incoming courtiers to find jobs for their friends and kick out the existing incumbents. Even across the transitions from Henry to Edward to Mary to Elizabeth, fraught with Catholic/Protestant vindictiveness, Philip's career advanced seamlessly. He was made bailiff to Queen Anne of Cleves. Under Bloody Mary he received lucrative posts as Searcher and then Comptroller of Customs. When he died in Elizabeth's reign, he still governed Camber. So, we must ask, why did he enjoy this extraordinary success, which looks as if he never lost personal favour with the Tudor royals as a family?
This leads us to sift through the story of the Siege of Boulogne. The English documents are no help at all. They were written to glorify the king's success. There is no trace in them of any episode which might cast doubt on His Majesty's godlike control of the field of battle. Indeed, three huge oil paintings were made soon after for propaganda, depicting in detail three stages of the 1544 operation. The largest one, of the army before Boulogne, shows the king standing near a group of cannon, directing operations. He towers above the soldiers round him, and is dressed in full armour. Yes, he was a royally tall man (as we know from Holinshed's Chronicles); but no, by that date he could hardly stand; still less do so in heavy armour. In truth he was old and diseased; his legs (which Queen Catherine Parr was skilled at bandaging) were too swollen to bear the pressure of armour; he had to be hoisted on to a horse; normally he was carried on a litter. So the painter and chronicler were each doing what England expected - keeping up a royal myth.
But the French documents give us the clues we are looking for.
WHY BOULOGNE?
[Jackie's note: to view photographs of the sites mentioned in this article, you can't do better than http://www.mincoin.com/. From the index on the left side of the page, click "Galerie Photos". This brings up an interactive map, which not only gives you an overview of the entire area, but allows you to click on individual cities for photographs of that city. For Boulogne, click on "Boulogne-sur-mer", on the left side of the map. "Calais", also mentioned in this article is near the top of the map near the red dotted line representing the "Tunnel sous la manche" (or the Channel Tunnel).]
Half a mile from the concrete and iron of the modern ferry port, stands one of the great walled towns of northern Europe. If cross-Channel travelers ever looked beyond the banal commercial town, they could see in the 'Haute Ville', a huge square of high stone walls, 420 by 320 metres, with ramparts, towers and guarded gates, almost unchanged since they were built about 1231. The old Counts of Boulogne were powerful men: Godefroi de Bouillon was a famous Crusader; Stephen, Count of Blois and Boulogne, became King of England. And the fortress town had international prestige, since its Castle, built on Roman foundations, is said to have been impregnable - even to the Vikings when they overran the rest of northern France. In the cavernous underground galleries you can see huge blocks with which breaches have been repaired, in some places with chunks of sculpted stone. It is a seriously important fortress.
Therefore, when Henry VIII devised his strategy to ally with the Emperor Charles V against France, and in the spoils of victory to enlarge England's territory in France, he naturally saw Boulogne as his first objective. It lay a few miles from Calais, England's sole possession on the Continent, and should be an easy conquest if his army was large enough. The king therefore assembled over 30,000 men for the task, and records show that Philip Chute was involved in waggon-transport for the king�s material. It was a colossal logistic operation even before the army left English soil. The cost to the Treasury was prodigious.
Henry's showmanship added to the cost. Having staged a flamboyant confrontation with the French king Francis I a few years earlier, at the Field of the Cloth of Gold, Henry planned the conquest of Boulogne with similar spectacle. Much of his army was specially dressed in red, and the royal entourage had gold borders to their scarlet uniforms.
An advance contingent was sent to prepare the ground before the King himself reached Calais in July 1544. The bulk of the force was under three commanders: the Duke of Suffolk, Lord Russell and the Earl of Surrey. The 30,000 under them included a large German contingent supplied by the Emperor. King Henry had a personal force of 1200, half being cavalrymen, the others pikemen, archers, crossbowmen, etc. The King's Band included Edward Rogers, Captain, at 10 shillings pay per day, and Philip Chute, Standard Bearer at 6 shillings.
THE ATTACKS BEFORE THE SIEGE
Some of the French accounts are as one-sided as the English ones. There were, however, several eye-witnesses, men trapped in the town, who left a daily record of their experiences. The most complete history of the siege, including detailed statistics of soldiery on both sides and an expert analysis of the day-to-day military operation, is that of Alexandre Marmin, pub�lished in 1825. He drew up a map of the various military dispositions and the places of each main attack. He used at least five English sources as well as several French. This is his story, in which the most important part to us relates to the first days before lines were immovably drawn for the siege itself; and in particular to the evidence he cites from a M. Crepieule, one of the eye-witnesses.
Before King Henry arrived, the English occupied the lands round Boulogne, including its old Roman lighthouse, the Tour d'Odre, which fell on July 22nd with scarcely a shot fired, and then (24th) the lower town below the fortress, which they pillaged. Flushed with success, the English became "de plus en plus opiniatres dans leurs desseins" - increasingly headstrong (?bloody-minded) in their schemes. Thus provoked, Philippe Corse, aide-de-camp to the town governor and the most experienced soldier there, led a series of sudden sorties by slamming down the drawbridge and rushing out with horsemen through the English advance guard, who were too surprised to stop them. A sortie on 25 July for example "chased Winters and his soldiers from a key position they had occupied on the hill of Dringhen".
The English morale leapt when the king arrived on 26th July. He began setting up his HQ at the village of TerIincthun, 3 kilometres north of Boulogne. One can imagine all the ceremony and posturing of King's courtiers dressed up for an easy victory, and the normal disorder as incoming men of different functions (archers, halberdiers, crossbowmen, pikemen, grooms, smiths, etc) are being settled into appropriate dispositions - and hence the disarray while lines were drawn and tents and stables set up. This is the time when one is most vulnerable to attack.
The men of Boulogne saw the king come and "d�cident de frapper fort" [decided to strike hard]. They quickly organised a sortie, and the surprise was total when the drawbridge was lowered before a charge of cavalry and infantry. The besieged men headed for Terlincthun, that is, towards the headquarters of Henry VIII. Several men of the royal escort ranged themselves before this vigorous charge and met their deaths. But as the element of surprise went, the Boulonnais had to return under a rain of arrows and bullets. The brother of the rhymester, Perrotin Morin, was in this expedition; he came back carried by his comrades with his shoulder horribly mutilated by the blow of an axe; he took several days to die." (Dossiers, p. 22).
Cr�pieule, one of those inside Boulogne, had written "les assi�g�s, dans une de leurs sorties, attaquerent I' escorte du roy d'Angleterre qui se rendait au quartier g�n�ral a Terlinctun, lui tuerent 7 officiers et 40 soldats. " **
[The besieged, in one of their sorties, attacked the English king's escort which
was moving into its headquarters at Terlinctun, and killed seven officers and 40 soldiers].
** We cannot trace Crepieule's MS today, but Marmin, a scholarly and careful
writer, frequently quotes him as a reliable source)
This must, by elimination, be the event when Philip performed his act of valour.
At no other point, so far as records show, was the royal entourage involved in close fighting.
By the evening of the 26th, the king's enormous bodyguard was in full military readiness. From then on, the encircled town was under artillery bombardment - 40,000 cannon balls fell in 7 weeks - and any sizeable foray from a main gate was nipped in the bud. The only other time when Henry came near the French was after the surrender was signed, when he set lines of English soldiers on both sides of the road and forced the refugees with their carts to leave between the lines under his gaze. Neither French nor English accounts record any attack near the king on that occasion; the French governor had given his word.
THE SIEGE
While not relevant to Philip Chute's exploit, it is worth outlining the human side to the siege. (You can skip this bit if you wish, and return to Philip in the following section.) The defenders' records give the familiar picture of a mass of heterogeneous people, accidentally cooped up in a besieged city, while cannon balls fall unpredictably among them over seven long ghastly weeks. There was treachery and cowardice as well as heroism.
Boulogne was such a well-built and well-provisioned fortress that when the English first landed, its Governor, a Marshal Dubiez, thought it prudent to go and take command of the weaker castle of Montreuil nearby, leaving his son-in-law Courcy de Vervins in charge. Courcy had little military experience, but had as right hand man Philippe Corse, a highly expert soldier who effectively organised the defense as well as leading marauding sorties in person. Corse commanded a mercenary force of some 500 Italians. Unhappily for the defenders, Corse was hit by a cannonball in early August, and died later; this caused consternation among soldiers and citizens alike, who had no confidence in Courcy. There was more distress when the defenders, on a quick sally outside the walls, picked up a paper tied to an arrow, giving details of the weak spots in the town's defenses. This was clearly a message intended for the English, and a suspect within the walls was summarily hanged.
Leadership was taken up by the civilian Mayor, Eurvin, whose morale-boosting bravery has gone down in local history. (A street is still named after him.) He rallied the resistance, despite a threat of mutiny of the Italian mercenaries who saw no point in fighting after Corse was slain. It is curious that not only did M. Cr�pieule keep a day-by-day record from inside the town, but a local priest, Anth�ol Morin, wrote a similar, record in heroic verse couplets. And later, a Baron d'Ordre, who may be the same as the man of that name who commanded a group of soldiers in the town, wrote yet another epic poem describing the Siege.
All agree that Courcy was the first to contemplate surrender. Some historians suspect he could have had a meeting earlier with Henry's court and taken money on a promise to hasten the town's surrender. Another explanation is that the defenders ran out of gunpowder; but nobody says they were starved out. There is no doubt that some 40,000 cannonballs fell, that walls were breached and thousands died. Whatever the reason, Courcy decided to surrender in early September and, without getting general consent, went with an embassy to King Henry, where terms were agreed. Eurvin and the populace apparently reacted furiously and threatened violence to Courcy if he didn't retract the surrender. But by Sept 14th it was fait accompli. On the 18th Henry moved into Boulogne in procession.
News came that the Emperor had made peace with the French behind his back. This led to conferences and a treaty with France. Henry knighted several men on the 30th September, and the same day sailed home to England.
The French accounts tell of shameful rape, slaughter and pillage by the English in defiance of the surrender terms, and terrible sufferings of the refugees after they had humiliatingly left between files of English and German soldiery. Soon after, his compatriots censured Dubiez for leaving his post, hanged Courcy for cowardice, and made Eurvin a public hero.
PHILIP�S ACHIEVEMENT
The central facts are:
�
the King gave him
a gemstone from his ring, which was surely an impulsive gesture at a rare
moment of unselfish emotion;
�
Philip is always
recorded as Standard Bearer to Henry VIII, who for his valour at
�
Philip enjoyed
unbroken favour from all Tudor monarchs;
�
In his portrait
he holds a dog, traditional symbol of fidelity.
To enlarge our interpretation, we may set those facts against the background:
�
that in pre-1544
documents Philip is always described as 'yeoman' or 'king's servant', never as
gentleman;
�
that some
Somerset Chutes had been condemned for treason in supporting the Pretender
Perkin Warbeck against Henry VII (and at least some fled
�
that Philip owed his start in public life to the patronage
of Sir Thomas Cheney, Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports; Cheney maintained an
officers' training camp at
Knowing the history of the Siege, we can now deduce that Philip's act of valour was in withstanding the French surprise attack on 26 July, and, from the gift of the gemstone and the subsequent royal family favour, we deduce that the King saw Philip as a key figure in defending his royal person against wounding or death, and that he commended Philip to all his children.
Henry may well have had the fright of his life when, amid the pageantry and the bowing and scraping, he forgot the danger of a French pre-emptive attack. Given the ferocity of a cavalry charge, it is likely that Philip was wounded; and if so, we can imagine the King, later that day, being carried to the dressing station and impulsively giving Philip the gemstone. (Rogers, Captain of the Royal Band, was probably not at his post when the attack was repulsed, as he was not knighted later.)
Why was Philip not knighted? Perhaps because he was not then classed as a gentleman. Or because he had been sent home earlier, among the gravely wounded?
Whatever the reason, one can easily imagine the follow-up, back in England, from his relative and patron Sir Thomas Cheney, who knew the whole story of the Chute disgrace after Warbeck. Cheney, as Court Treasurer, had opportunity and motive to mention to the King that the Chute family were ancient gentry but had blacked their name during the preceding reign; and that now it might be the right moment to restore their family name to honour.
The heraldic award, indeed, cost Henry less than knighting Philip - which, as a public accolade, might have involved letting slip the secret that the royal person had very nearly been savaged by a Frenchman.
That danger may have been especially great if it was Philippe Corse himself who led the charge against the king's headquarters; he as a mercenary would have no chivalrous scruple in killing a king.
From this well-founded story we may confidently add to Philip's name the battle-honour "Terlincthun 26 July 1544" and the credit for restoring the tarnished dignity of the Chutes as well as their landowning wealth.
Attached are various accounts from English and French sources of the whole course of the Siege of Boulogne. They are the result of research on both sides of the Channel, and give confidence that we now have as much detail as will (probably) ever be known, to make the deductions on which this further bit of Chute history is based.
Historical Sources
English.
1.a.
Rymer's History of the Siege and Capture
of
This is the only day-by-day account in
English, but is woefully inadequate as history. �It does contain useful statistical data on
commanders and regimental strengths, which French historians accept. But its focus
is the ceremonial doings of the king and the nobles, and its standpoint is
aloof from the flesh-and-blood battle. Far too often, a military action is
written off as an "alarombe' (alarm) without explanation. (Philip Chute,
not being a noble who supplied men and money to the enterprise, is of course
never mentioned.)
Moreover, as to the course of events,
Rymer is culpably selective. For example, he reports the 25th July sortie when
"the frenche-men came out of the
toune of Boulloigne on foote and Skyrmyshed with our Footmen harde by the Braye
in grete Space; and at the said Skyrmyshe Mr Winter's brother was slaine, with
divers others on both Parties". This corresponds closely with the French
writers. But he makes no mention whatever of the 26th July sortie, which in the
French accounts reached "I' escort
du roi'. For that day, Rymer is wholly occupied with detailing the
ceremonial order of parade of the King's entourage as it left
It would have been imprudent for Rymer
to record what really happened to spoil that "good ordre"; just as
the painter of the Cowdray painting had to ignore the King's physical handicaps
and show him in the most majestic light. (No "warts and
all" for a Tudor king!)
l.b.
The published text of Rymer is accompanied by a verbal description (dated 1772)
of the oil painting formerly at
2. ������ Francis
Godwin, Bishop of Llandaff & Hereford, in his Latin history Rerum anglicanarum Henrico VIII, Edwardo VI et Maria regnantibus annales (
(This writer has not
seen the original, only the translation made by Sr, de Loigny in the Vol. 7 Bulletin of the Societe Academique de
Boulogne, 1904-1907. p. 392 on.)
French
1. ��Of the two
verse epics mentioned, that by the priest Morin in 179 stanzas (published in an
edition by F. Morand) was written day by day from inside the besieged town. He
seems rarely to have left shelter to check what he is told, never hints at the
unpopularity of Courcy de Vervins, and is poorly regarded by French historians.
Baron d' Ordre's verse is more elegant but less informative.
2. Cr�pieule's eye-witness account is in sober prose.
His MS appears to have been lost, but in 1825 it was available to Marmin, who
often quotes it as a reliable authority.
3. Alexandre Marmin's history of the Siege was published
in 1825 as an extended Note to Baron
d'Ordre's epic poem. Marmin also supervised the drawing of a Map, which shows
troop dispositions and the points at which each main attack was directed. His
is much the most detailed account in French, quoting many English and French
sources and applying an obviously expert knowledge of military operations. Our
summary of the Siege above and below is based on him and on source 7.
4. Page de la Vie
d' Eurvin, by Benard (1855) is a competent summary of the Siege, concentrating
by definition on the heroism of Mayor Eurvin.
5. Histoire de
Boulogne sur Mer, by A. d'Hauttefeuille et L.
Benard (1860) is the source which suggests (Vol I, p.229) that the July 26th
sortie might have been led by Philippe Corse.
6. Boulogne sur
Mer a travers les Ages, by Andre Verley (1979), contains in Vol. II, p. 107
a section we have included on uniforms and early sallies.
7. Les Dossiers de
I' Histoire boulonnaise, Vols 1 & 2, publ. Jan/Feb. & March/Apr.
1977, provide the fullest modern account in easily readable magazine form. Copy
held at Boulogne Municipal Library, who kindly allowed the attached pages to be
photocopied. ��Unfortunately the Dossiers
do not quote sources for their information, but there is no sign that the
account is not objective.
8. There is a further MS in
Map
of the Siege
Marmin explains why in one respect -
his placing of the Royal Guard - he departs from the authority of the Cowdray
painting. He says his instinct was to accept the Cowdray version, that the
royal guard was deployed in reserve, close to the king's HQ at Terlincthun, had
it not been for a record of the death of Hunt, the king's smith. From this
detail he deduces that the whole Royal Guard were probably placed within range
of cannonades from the town, or of French raiding parties; he therefore shows
them situated in the space between the Corps d' Avant-Garde and the Corps de
Bataille.
Rymer's actual words re Hunt (14 Aug.)
are: "Hunt, the Kinges Smythe, was slayne, wt a gon, in
my Iorde Admyrall his Leger (leaguer) in his Forge". Marmin's deduction
from one man's presumed station when killed seems hardly enough cause to
contradict Sir Anthony Browne's version of how this key English force was
deployed. Admittedly the portrayal of the king in full armour was false; but
this insertion for propaganda purposes is perhaps not enough to undermine the
general credibility of the Cowdray picture.
However, even if the Royal Guard did
deploy within range of French cannon or sorties, Philip's deed of valour must
have occurred at the earlier date of July 26th, because:
(i) Philip seems to have personally
defended the King, so the danger did not come from a long-distance cannonball;
(ii) there is
no French record of a sortie aimed at the King after July 26th;
(iii) after
the shock of that attack, the royal guard would have been doubly vigilant in
its new position, and would not have let any other French sortie near enough to
endanger the king. (Rymer frequently reports occasions when careless sentries
were hanged.)
COURSE
OF THE SIEGE
On 20 July the artillery opened the
first breach in the walls. Courcy de Vervins, acting governor of
To get a quick victory, the English
raised their bombardment level from 700 balls a day
to 2,000 - about one per minute. Most were solid stone
balls, but some were 'Greek fire', hollowed into a primitive 'shell' with a
fuse. The French retaliated with surprise sallies; on 25 July the Porte
Flamengue drawbridge was slammed down and "like a devil from his box, 300
men rushed out, shouting; with sabres and lances Ph. Corse's surprise sally
chased the besiegers as far as the hill of Dringhem, returning before the English
could counter-attack". From the walls the Boulonnais saw 20 English
redcoats lying dead, including one of the senior officers, brother to Lord
Winter. The 26 July sortie has been mentioned already.
It may be of interest to enumerate the English force (as calculated by Marmin with help of data from Rymer)
|
Men |
of
whom horsemen |
at start of siege |
24,000
|
2,100
|
arrived 28 July, infantry freed from
duty in |
9,000
|
|
arr. 6 August from |
200 |
200 |
arr. 12 Aug. from |
�500 |
|
arr, 12 Aug. a cavalry company |
100 |
100 |
arr. 13 Aug. a German cavalry corps
including one company of horse artillery |
300 |
300 |
arr. 14 Aug. a detachment of Spanish
cannoniers |
100 |
|
arr, 19 Aug. German cavalry which had
quitted siege of |
4,000 |
4,000 |
with them came 6 infantry cos. &
2 artillery cos. say |
800 |
|
Total force |
30,900 |
6,700 |
|
|
|
Breakdown of numbers between Commanders. approx. |
|
|
Avant-garde under Lord Russell: |
|
|
�
8 battalions of infantry |
4,800 |
|
�
4 squadrons cavalry |
600 |
600 |
�
1 company foot artillery |
100 |
|
������������������������ subtotal |
5,500 |
600 |
|
|
|
Corps de Bataille under Charles
Brandon, Duke of |
|
|
�
20 battalions infantry |
12,000 |
|
���
6 squadrons cavalry |
900 |
900 |
���
1 company horse artillery |
100 |
100 |
���
4 companies foot artillery |
400 |
|
��������������������������� subtotal |
13,400 |
1,000 |
|
|
|
Arriere-garde under Lord Surrey
(the poet) |
|
|
�
9 battalions infantry |
5,400 |
|
�
4 squadrons cavalry |
600 |
600 |
�
1 company foot artillery |
100 |
|
��������������������������� subtotal |
6,100 |
600 |
|
|
|
Observation Corps under Count de
Buren |
|
|
��
6 companies infantry |
600 |
|
�
26 squadrons cavalry |
3,900 |
3,900 |
��
2 companies foot artillery |
200 |
|
�������� �������������������subtotal |
4,700 |
3,900 |
Note: Count de Buren commanded the
German troops who had besieged |
||
Total
force excluding Royal Guard |
29,700 |
6,100 |
Royal Guard under King's immediate
Command |
|
|
�
2 companies archers under |
200 |
|
�
2 companies of pikemen |
200 |
|
�
2 companies of crossbowmen |
200 |
|
�
1 elite cavalry co. under Duke of Albuquerque |
100 |
100 |
�
2 cos. men at arms under Earl of Essex & Sir �
Thos. Darcy |
200 |
200 |
�
1 co.light cavalry |
100 |
100 |
�
1 co. demi-lances |
100 |
100 |
�
1 co. horse artillery under John Uprichards |
100 |
100 |
�
1 co. foot artillery under Harman |
100 |
|
������������������ ��������������subtotal Royal Guard |
1,300 |
600 |
|
|
|
Grand Total English Force, estimate |
31,000 |
6,700 |
It
was partly the expense of maintaining this huge force which obliged the king to
call a halt to his invasion of
(Le roi d'angleterre) pour icelle
battre avoit amen� par mer trois cens pieces dartillerie de toute sorte.
(Guillaume Paradin, 1510-1590, who wrote a history of the wars of his time) �[The King of
England for this battle brought by sea three hundred pieces of artillery of
various kinds].
Marmin comments that for 300 pieces of
artillery, 9 companies of foot artillery and two of horse artillery would be
enough men, since at that date each piece of artillery only required 2
canonniers and 3 loaders. There would of course have been present numerous
pioneers (i.e. diggers and general manual labour) to help handle guns as well
as dig level platforms for them; these are not included in his numerical
estimate above.
He adds that the besiegers brought
mills for grinding com, bread-ovens and a huge amount of livestock. He doubts
Cr�pieule's estimate that they had 28,000 pack-horses, but accepts
that they had 100 mills which were turned by horse-power, 15,000
cattle and "une infinit�
de moutons et d' autres vives". [an
infinity of sheep and other livestock]
By contrast the defence garrison
- per Marmin - consisted of:
�
100 cavalrymen at
arms, commanded by Nicolas de S1. Blimont, baron d'Ordre;
�
500 French
infantrymen under Francois de Renty, Sieur d' Aix;
�
300 French
infantrymen under Jacques de Bochebaron, Sieur de Lignon;
�
500 Italian infantry
under Philippe Corse; and
�
about 100 canonniers.
Rymer however says that among the
refugees from the town after surrender, i.e. those who would not stay and
accept King Henry's authority, were 2000 "Men of Warre of the Toune ... to
the nombre in all ijm�. Allowing for previous casualties, we may estimate the
initial defence force as at least 3000. Even on that calculation, the besieged
were outnumbered by a ratio of 10 to 1.
Courcy de Vervins, acting Governor
of
The French accounts stress the
fearfulness and indecision of Courcy, as being largely responsible for the
capitulation of the town. Some writers hint that before the Siege began he had
taken a bribe to agree an early surrender. If he was so feeble, it is surprising
that Marshal Dubiez would have left his son in law in charge, though his
reasoning was that:
�
�
It was also
better fortified than
�
Philippe Corse's
experience was amply good enough to support Courcy.
By blaming/executing Courcy it was
easier to highlight Eurvin as the real hero of
The course of the siege may be read in
the French and English versions from 'Dossiers' and Rymer.
A letter survives from Henry VIII to
Queen Catherine Parr dated September, saying the siege is taking longer than
expected, but since more gunpowder is expected from Flanders, the end is
certainly near.
A few further quotes from French
sources are added below.
1.
Luxurious uniforms.
Having said that the troop commanded by
the Duke of Albuquerque (Spaniard; ambassador from the Emperor Charles V) wore
gold-embroidered uniforms, Verley (op. cit.) adds:
�Selon l'historien
anglais Hebert, l�uniforme des soldats �tait du plus grand luxe. La caval
2.� Events of 22 - 26th July
Extracts from Histoire de Boulogne sur Mer, by A. d'Hautteville et L'Benard.Vol I (1860) p.229; and from 'Les Dossiers de l' Histoire Boulonnaise'
(1977):
Cependant le si�ge
continuait avec une tenacit� sans exemple. La basse-ville, ouverte de toutes parts, fut prise par I'ennemi (24
juillet) et pill�e; la Tour d'Odre, occup�e par un
faible d�tachement, fut enlev�e sans combat (22 juillet) et les Anglais,
encourag�s par ces premiers succ�s, devinrent de plus en plus opini�tres dans
leurs desseins.
[However, the siege continued with an
unprecedented tenacity. The lower-city, open on all sides, was taken by enemy on
July 24th and was plundered; the Tour d�Odre (Roman lighthouse),
occupied by a weak detachment, was taken without resistance on July 22 and the
English, encouraged by these first successes, became increasingly obstinate in
their intentions.]
Philippe Corse apporta un temps d�arr�t � l�ardeur belliqueuse des assi�geants;
dans une sortie avec ses Italiens, il porta le d�sordre dans les rangs anglais
et chassa Winters et ses soldats
d'une position irnportante qu'ils occupaient au revers de la
montagne de Dringhen, pres du
village de
["The besiegers' ardour for war was pulled up short by
Philippe Corse who, in a sortie with his band of Italians, caused disorder in the English ranks,
and drove out Winters and his soldiers from an important position they occupied on the rear of
mountain of Dringhen, close to the village of St Martin (July 25). (HBM)] [He commanded a 500-strong force of
Italian mercenaries].
Les cris des bless�s
r�sonnent encore le lendemain lorsque Henri VIII en personne, arrivant de Calais,
prend Ie commandement du si�ge.
Acte militaire ou psychologique, il est bien difficile
de se prononcer avec certitude, mais l'ardeur des soldats redouble � la vue de
leur souverain, car la victoire ne peut �tre loin. Les Boulonnais apercoivent
�galement l'arriv�e de l'arm�e royale et decident de
frapper fort.
[The cries of the casualties still resound
the following day when Henry VIII in person, arrives in
Ils organisent h�tivement une sortie, et la surprise est
totale lorsque le pont
devant de cette charge et y trouv�rent la mort, mais l�effet
de surprise pass�, Ies Boulonnais doivent rentrer sous une pluie de fl�ches et
de boulets.� Le fr�re du rimailleur,
Perrotin Morin, faisait partie de cette exp�dition, il
en revint soutenu par ses camarades, son �paule horriblement mutil�e par un
coup de hache. Il mettra plusieurs jours avant de
mourir.
(Dossiers)
["They quickly organised a sortie, and took the English completely by surprise
when the drawbridge was dropped to let loose a charge of cavalry and infantry. The defenders headed towards Terlincthun,
which was the headquarters of Henry VIII. Several men of the royal escort stood to face the
charge and met their deaths, but when the element of surprise was past, the Boulonnais had to
retreat under a hail of arrows and bullets. The brother of the rhymester, Perrotin Morin, was
one of the attackers; he came back supported by his comrades, his shoulder horribly mutilated by the
blow of an axe. He took several days to die"]
3.
Courcy less valiant than his soldiers and/or corrupt.
Paradin (op. cit.) says that despite
the 300 artillery pieces and the 'prodigious efforts' of the English king to
take
"n�anmoins
les Souldars qui estoient dedans avoient Ie coeur en si bon endroit, qu�il ne
l'eut jamais prinse (=prise) sans le Seigneur de Vervin, qui par faute de
coeur, et voulant (comme lon dit) faire son proufit particulier, rendit ladite
ville au Roi d'Angleterre."
"Although the soldiers in the town had such
valiant hearts that the town would never have been taken without the
Seigneur de Vervin, it was his faint-heartedness and (as some say) desire for personal profit which betrayed the
town to the English King."]
4.
Ill-treatment of Refugees & English robbery of sacred statue.
The general history of the
"Le gouverneur,
contre l�avis du mayeur et des �chevins, n�gocia Ia capitulation de la ville. Le jour de la Sainte Croix, un
cort�ge pitoyable de 3664 personnes quitta
["The governor, against the wishes
of the mayor and of the aldermen, negotiated the surrender of the city. �On the day of the Holy Cross, a pitiful
cort�ge of 3664 people left
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
| Home | Chute Family Index | Full Surname Index | Contact | Citation Information Most recently revised on Wednesday, September 06, 2006. Contents ©2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 Francis Chute and the Chute Family in the AllChutes.ged. All rights reserved, including the right of reproduction in whole or in part or in any form by the Chute Family. Send corrections or additions to this record, or requests for reproduction in any form to The Chute Family. Originally generated on Saturday, Mar 10 2001 by GedHTree Version 2.08 ©1999, 2000 by Gary Welker (software developer), all rights reserved.