Return to Simon's Research Site
HELP I'm STUCK
© Simon Martin and other contributors
2000
Show Birth and Marriage Certificate on
the screen in the pre-meeting time. What is wrong here?
How would you solve it?
There is a Standard Proceedure for
building a pedigree it is:
Standard Proceedure back to Mid 1837
Birth - Marriage - Birth - Marriage etc.
Also Census.
Should point you back to parish family
living in before 1837.
1837 Back to 1538
Use Parish Registers of Baptism,
Marriage and Burial
1538 to 1086
Court Rolls
Dombesday Book
Before 1086
Gets More difficult!
So we are all back to 1086 are we?
Why are we all not back to 1086?
Who is back to 1900s - Eastenders - Show
File
1800s Idiosyncrasies with registration
system show overhead of Birth and Marriage Certificate again.
Not enough information being gathered at the time of
registration, Scottish system better but starts later.
1700s Latin, bad writing
1600s Civil War
1500s Poor Register survival rates and
copying errors, summary on copying ie only name of person
baptised nothing else.
1300s or 1400s Poor survival rates try
Inquisition Post-mortem and published genealogies Also many Wills
in PCC etc.
1086-1300 Peasants Revolt - some Court
Rolls Burnt very poor court roll survival rate. Black death
rapid burial and scribes may die some court rolls not written up.
Before 1086 There are a few Saxon wills
still in existence, Bede, Anglo Saxon Chronicles
But we are probably stuck in the 1800s,
1700s or 1600s.
How I did it? What problems I
faced using the overheads.
The
two biggest tips are:
DO
IT NOW - Interview the living before they become the dead. Do
this before you do anything even before you get organised. Write
up your notes as quickly as possible, and then go back with your
typed up notes, and get them checked.
DO
IT NEXT - Write on the back of Photos in pencil.
At
least you will have a rough family history and know exactly what
your ancestors looked like.
Get organised
Computer
Family Tree Programs
Custodian and Cloos
Manual Systems eg that offered by
Ramsbottom
Yes that sounds nice I must do it some
time - START NOW
Don't use scraps of paper unless that is
all you have on you at the time. Buy a small hard-backed
robust pocket notebook.
Do use pocket computers but back them
up, and take extra batteries.
Or use strong hard backed notebooks
leave the facing page blank for future observations and cross-references.
Leave first few pages blank for contents/Index. Number each
page and number each notebook.
Record everything and where it can be
found again
Record everything [Records can still be
lost, but a least you can reconstruct it from your notes] and its
source so you can find it again.
You will need to look at things again.
With experience you spot things you did not spot the first time.
Eg Birkenhew on a Banns register entry turns out to be Birkenhead.
Handwriting and Latin
Go on courses and/or borrow books to
start to get experience reading old writing and Latin. The
more documents and transcripts you read and translate the better
you will get.
Borthwick Wallets - York
Gooder - Latin For Local History
A Secretary Hand ABC Book, Alf Ison,
Berkshire Books, ISBN 1 871941-08-3
The Record Interpreter - Charles Trice
Martin - Phillimore
If you are stuck - consider the
following
Did the event take place in a different
geographical or administrative area [eg Peculiar]?
Did the event take place in a different
country, or did the person emigrate? [Remember Scotland and
Ireland are different countries for our purposes]
Was the event recorded in another
denomination or religion?
Are there any historical copies of the
record eg Bishops Transcript or Parish Register Society who
transcribed the record. They may have transcribed your entry
before it got ripped off the foot of a page or faded. [I
did some work on a baptism from Bradley in Derbyshire the foot of
one of the pages in the parish register looked a bit raged, when
I compared it to the Bishops Transcript, the baptism I sought was
there but had now been lost off the foot of the parish register
due to wear and tear due to too much use. Always check
Bishops Transcripts as sometimes the bishop's copy may have more
detail that the parish register as it was the Bishop or
Archdeacon who would read it.
Could the event have happened at a
different time to that thought? Did the person think it was
age next birthday they wanted. Or a census age can be
rounded up or down. [In 1841 Enumerators were
instructed to mark adults down to the nearest 5 years, sometimes
they thought the instructions were the same in 1851 and may have
continued to round down then too]. Remember there can be
late baptisms and late probate of wills.
A possible date range of birth can be
calculated from just one age and a date a person was that age, as
follows:
Day + 1 / Month /Year - Age - 1 till
Day/ Month/ Year - Age
eg Today is 19 Nov 2000 and I am 34
years old
So I was born between 19+1/11/2000-34-1
and 19/11/2000-34
So I was born 20/11/1965 and 19/11/1966
or between 20 November 1965 and 19
November 1966 which is true. - 25 December 1965 and my picture
was in the Wigan Observer to prove it!
Try it with yourself as long as the age
late birthday is correct it is fine. But you never ask a
lady her age do you, and that is where problems start?
These calculations can then be combined
to reduce the possible date of birth even more:
5 Jan 1800
[------------------------------------------] 4 Jan 1801
30 Apr 1800[-----------------------------------------------]29
Apr 1801
Therefore possible date of birth is:
30 Apr 1800[------------------------] 4 Jan 1801
Remember Americans and others have
different ways of recording dates. Always show the
month as a 3 letter word Jan, Feb etc. and the year in full
in your notes or exactly as it appears in the document if
transcribing.
In 1752 some days were lost from the
Calendar and the year started on the 1 Jan not 25 Mar [Lady Day]
this results in the tax year being the 5 April every year. People
understandably became confused on how old they were if they lived
through 1752.
The event is not recorded at all? Drunk
vicar? Dead vicar? Absent minded vicar?
Eldest son may not appear in a will as
he inherited all the land which is often not recorded in earlier
wills.
Has the person changed their name? Most
names are spelt phonetically in the past ie how it sounded.
Copestake has been spelt Cowsteak [Very tasty], Capstock,
Copestick, Cowpstacke etc.. Married women change their name
at marriage except in Scotland where they can retain their maiden
names. Married women at death are listed under their
married names. I have forgot this a number of times. A
H at the front of a name can be missed off eg Hapwood could be
Apwood no problem except they are a long way from each other in
an index. Names can change on copying eg Sampson to Samuel,
well they are both in the bible!
Is there more than one likely record?
Kill em off with the burials register and wills etc. Marry
em off! if by licence you can get age at marriage and if married
before. If they are having two lots of kids in two
different places at the same time they are probably different
people [or bigamists!]
Are your assumptions really correct,
write out the persons full lives as a narrative story. Does
it really work? Could he have been in two places at the same
time?
Are the records really lost?
Church warden burnt them, or put in a
cellar which flooded or both- Snelston
Ultra violet light can reveal washed off
inks.
Look for copies made before destruction
eg Antiquarians records etc.
Check for contemporary copies eg in
deeds or Bishops Transcripts. Is the record still in
someone's attic [Particularly Non-Anglican] was a copy made by
the parish before it was deposited in the Public Record Office of
Ireland, before it was burnt down?
Have you only looked at the index?
The entry may be there but indexed under a different surname or
missed of the index. Eg Staffordshire Parish Register
Society indexes to their volumes are very useful indeed, but not
100% accurate.
Is the entry there but you missed it?
Due to bad writing, pages being missed in microfilming, Latin,
twins. Have a break and look again. It is often
possible to see the original record if the microfilming is bad.
Finally - Don't forget:
Don't forget death Certificates - ages
in index for 1866.
Do buy certificates as they confirm your
family line and it is a false economy just to rely on indexes.
Do double check everything.
1901 Census Index will be on the
Internet from 1 Jan 2002. Also I understand the 1891 Census for
Norfolk is being used as a guinea pig and may be on line before
then.
1881 Census Index
1851 Census Index is published for many
places
Scottish Records Via Internet, 1891
Census, 1881 Census, Births Marriages and Deaths
British Vital Records esp. late 1800s,
Liverpool & Wigan St Catherines etc.
IGI Now on the Internet.
Memorial Inscriptions - published for
many places
####
DO NOT RELY ON INDEXES OR TRANSCRIPTS ALWAYS CHECK THE ORIGINALS
######
Guild of One Name Studies
Phone a friend.
Poor Law Records, Settlement, Removal
Orders, Bastardy, Oversears of the poor accounts, Constables
accounts, Highway accounts.
Churchwardens Accounts can go back
before Parish Registers and can include payments for burials eg
Prescot, Lancashire
Wills and Probate Records
Freemens Records of Towns
Court Records, Ecclesiastical Court
Records Where indexed
Society of Genealogists especially The
Great Card Index especially good for Pre 1837
Heraldic Visitations
Reconstruct the entire family as this
will give information on your Ancestors.
Check for infant burials when looking
for baptisms to rule out some baptisms.
Where possible check other collaborative
evidence. Buy certificates of brothers and sisters of your
ancestor when you can. If you follow the wrong line it can
be very expensive on time just to save £6.50 on a certificate.
Try and prove each fact 3 times if
possible.
Check your assumptions eg Birkenhead
being read as Birkenhew but clearly Birkenhead after some
practice and 10 years.
Be professional in your research ask
yourself questions and try and solve them. Think of ways of
disproving as well as proving your links record why you come to
your conclusions. Keep checking for other possible entries.
Advertise your interest in Family Tree
Magazine, Local Family History Newsletters, Internet
Recommended reading:
Colin Rogers - The Family Tree Detective
Mark Herber - Ancestral Trails now in
soft back - c£20. Waterstones in Manchester can get copies
of both these but phone them first before travelling a long way.
Phillimore Atlas of Parish Registers -
do not need to buy a copy there are plenty around.
My Talk Notes - Help I'm Stuck - http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~copestake/stuck1.html
Return to Simon's Research Site
Last updated 7 October 2001