HOME INTRODUCTION FAMILY HISTORY IMAGES THINGS . . . LINKS THANK YOUS
Drake DNA Surname Project, Page Two - R1b Results
Public Page at FamilyTreeDNA
Donate to Our Project's General Fund
Page One, Non-R1b Results
RETURN TO DNA SURNAMES PROJECTS
Last updated on 18 December 2016
(Click on the highlighted names below to see descendant charts)
(Recent changes are in Yellow)
(Haplotypes in Red have been predicted based on unambiguous results, those in Green have been confirmed through SNP testing)
| Earliest Known Ancestor | Kit # | Time Period | Location | *
H a p l o |
DYS# | Kit # | Earliest Known Ancestor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3
9 3 |
3
9 0 |
1
9 |
3
9 1 |
3
8 5 a |
3
8 5 b |
4
2 6 |
3
8 8 |
4
3 9 |
3
8 9 | 1 |
3
9 2 |
3
8 9 | 2 |
4
5 8 |
4
5 9 a |
4
5 9 b |
4
5 5 |
4
5 4 |
4
4 7 |
4
3 7 |
4
4 8 |
4
4 9 |
4
6 4 a |
4
6 4 b |
4
6 4 c |
4
6 4 d |
4
6 0
|
G
A T A H 4 |
Y
C A I I a |
Y
C A I I b
|
4
5 6 |
6
0 7 |
5
7 6 |
5
7 0 |
C
D Y a |
C
D Y b |
4
4 2 |
4
3 8 |
5
3 1
|
5 7 8
|
3 9 5 S 1 a |
3 9 5 S 1 b |
5 9 0
|
5 3 7
|
6
4 1 |
4 7 2
|
4 0 6 S 1
|
5 1 1
|
4 2 5
|
4 1 3 a |
4 1 3 b |
5 5 7
|
5
9 4
|
4
3 6 |
4
9 0 |
5
3 4 |
4
5 0 |
4
4 4
|
4
8 1
|
5
2 0
|
4
4 6
|
6
1 7
|
5
6 8
|
4
8 7
|
5
7 2
|
6
4 0
|
4
9 2
|
5
6 5
|
|||||||
|
IRELAND/ENGLAND - R1b1 |
The results for Kit# 73275, EKA Samuel Drake of England were added to our project on 03 Nov 2006 and were an exact 12 marker match with Kit# 23752, EKA George W. Drake of Ireland. This match moved one more member out of the Drake Orphan Brigade! |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| George W. Drake | 23752 | b. 1815 | Ireland | R-P25 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 24 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 14 | 17 | 18 | 38 | 38 | 12 | 12 | 23752 | George W. Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unknown | R-M269 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 16 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 24 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 18 | 11 | 12 | 19 | 23 | 15 | 15 | 18 | 18 | 36 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 342836 | Unknown | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Samuel Drake | 73275 | m. 1832 | Kent, England |
R-M269 |
13 | 23 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 16 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 18 | 11 | 12 | 19 | 23 | 15 | 15 | 18 | 18 | 36 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 12317 | Samuel Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DUTCH DRAKES - R1b1 |
All eight donors in this group match exactly on all 12 markers, meaning that all six donors have a 70.69% chance of sharing a common ancestor within the past 12 generations or sometime close to 1700AD (assuming 25 years per generation). Family tradition for the donor of kit number N55018, EKA Pascual Juica, claims that an ancestor of Pascual Juica was the illegitimate son of Sir Francis Drake. These results disprove that theory but it does appear that the Juica family shares a common ancestry with our Dutch Drakes. We need an upgrade to this kit to support that connection. Pasual Juica's matches diverged on the higher markers. EKAs William T. Drake and Stephen Drake are a 64/67 match meaning they have a 92% chance of sharing a common ancestor within 12 generations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gabriel de Fuica | N55018 | 1600 | Spain | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 15 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 16 | 09 | 09 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 17 | 36 | 37 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 17 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 15 | 08 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
N55018 |
Gabriel de Fuica |
| Josias Dratz | 29906 | 1647-1701 |
Holland to New York |
R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 15 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 29906 | Josias Dratz | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Samuel Drake | 4213 | b. 1800 | New York, NY | RM269 | 13 | 24 | 15 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 4213 | Samuel Drake | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| William Drake |
36301 |
b. 1720 | New York | R-L48 | 13 | 24 | 15 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 24 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 19 | 11 | 10 | 18 | 23 | 17 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 36 | 39 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 08 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 12 | 36301 | William Drake |
| William Drake |
50737 |
b. 1720 | New York | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 15 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 24 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 19 | 11 | 10 | 18 | 23 | 17 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 36 | 39 | 13 | 12 | 50737 | William Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| William T. Drake | 10577 | 1807-1878 | New York | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 15 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 29 | 10577 | William T. Drake | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| William T. Drake | 174539 | 1807-1878 | New York | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 15 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 29 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 24 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 19 | 11 | 10 | 18 | 23 | 18 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 37 | 39 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 08 | 12 | 22 | 19 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 12 | 174539 | William T. Drake |
| Stephen Drake | 93896 | b. late 1700s | CT to NJ | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 15 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 24 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 19 | 11 | 10 | 18 | 23 | 18 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 37 | 39 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 08 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 12 | 93896 | Stephen Drake |
| Henry Drake | 349872 | 1763-1853 | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 15 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 24 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 19 | 11 | 10 | 18 | 23 | 18 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 37 | 39 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 08 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 12 | 349872 | Henry Drake | |
| William B. Drake | 33316 | b. 1727 | New York | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 15 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 33316 | William B. Drake | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Josias Dratz | 39191 | 1647-1701 | New York | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 15 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 39191 | Josias Dratz | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FRANCIS DRAKE OF NEW YORK - R1b1 |
Kit #32665 has a 4 mutation genetic distance from kits 17639 and 2935 meaning the donors have a 94.15% chance of sharing a common ancestor within Twenty generations. Kits 17639 and 2935 have a 2 mutation genetic distance meaning that these two donors have a 99.40% chance of sharing a common ancestor within twenty generations. Kit #25675, Francis Drake has a two mutation genetic difference with 11 other donors in our entire database, meaning that this donor has a 11.56% chance of sharing a common ancestor with any of these other donors within the past 12 generations. I originally placed this kit in this group because this appeared to be the most likely place for a match. I may move this kit to the Drake Orphan Brigade. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Francis Drake | 25675 | b. 1774 | New York | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 15 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 23 | 15 | 19 | 28 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 12 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 17 | 15 | 19 | 17 | 36 | 38 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 08 | 12 | 22 | 19 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 25675 | Francis Drake |
| Francis P. Drake | 17639 | b. c. 1801 | of New York State | R-M269 | 13 | 23 | 15 | 11 | 11 | 15 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 19 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 14 | 18 | 29 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 17 | 37 | 38 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 17 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 17 | 08 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 17639 | Francis P. Drake |
| Francis Drake | 2935 | b. c. 1780 | Chester, NY | R-M269 | 13 | 23 | 15 | 11 | 11 | 16 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 19 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 15 | 18 | 29 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 17 | 37 | 38 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 17 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 08 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 2935 | Francis Drake |
| Francis Drake | 32665 | 1760-1833 | Tompkins Co., NY | R-M269 | 13 | 23 | 15 | 10 | 11 | 15 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 19 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 15 | 18 | 29 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 12 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 17 | 37 | 38 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 17 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 08 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 32665 | Francis Drake |
|
ESSEX, ENGLAND - R1b1 |
These two tests have a single mutation difference on DYS 449, meaning that they have a 97.1% chance of sharing a common ancestor within the past 12 generations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Robert Drake | 25426 | 1581-1667 | Essex England | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 10 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 28 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 36 | 38 | 12 | 12 | 25426 | Robert Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Robert Drake | 51179 | 1581-1668 | Essex England | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 10 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 36 | 38 | 12 | 12 | 51179 | Robert Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
VIRGINIA - R1b1 |
Using EKA William Drake, Kit #5372, as the base result for comparison, all of the tests in this group are within 1 or 2 mutations of the base test result. This likely means that there is a recent common ancestor but the 12 marker tests are not sufficient to allow to conclude that with any degree of assurance. These kits really need to be upgraded. We do have higher resolution results for Thomas Drake, Jr. (23727), Osborne Drake (26298), Archibald Drake (99633) and Epaphroditus Drake (2911). Using the 25 marker results, we can estimate that there is a 75% chance that these donors share a common ancestor within 12 generations. Kit #23727 (Thomas Drake, Jr.) has upgraded to 67 markers. Upgrading the other two kits to 67 markers would greatly increase our understanding of the relationship between these three kits. (Not to mention that the Kit#23727 donor's money will be wasted if no one else in this group upgrades.) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| James E. Drake | 3705 | b. 1798 | Powhatan, VA | P-P295 | 13 | 23 | 15 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 28 | 3705 | James E. Drake | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Thomas Drake | 4228 | b .c. 1758 | Virginia | - | 13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 28 | 4228 | Thomas Drake | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| William Drake | 5372 | b. 1707 | New Kent Co., VA | R-P25 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 28 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 38 | 39 | 13 | 12 | 5372 | William Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| James Drake | 12353 | 1740-1796 | Powhatan, VA | R-M269 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 28 | 12353 | James Drake | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| James Drake | 11760 | 1740-1796 | Powhatan, VA | R-P25 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 28 | 11760 | James Drake | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| James Drake | 12677 | 1740-1796 | Powhatan, VA | R-M269 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 28 | 16 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 38 | 39 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 21 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 08 | 12 | 23 | 21 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 12677 | James Drake |
| Unknown | 158060 | Kentucky | R-M269 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 28 | 16 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 14 | 19 | 17 | 38 | 40 | 13 | 12 | 158060 | Unknown | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| James Drake | 29388 | b. 1740 | R-M269 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 15 | 12 | 12 | 28 | 29388 | James Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Joel Drake | 313624 | 1755-1812 | R-M269 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 28 | 16 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 38 | 39 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 21 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 08 | 12 | 23 | 21 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 313624 | Joel Drake | |
| Thomas Drake, Jr. | 23727 | 1758-1835 | VA to Bedford Co TN | R-M269 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 28 | 16 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 38 | 39 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 21 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 08 | 12 | 23 | 21 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 23727 | Thomas Drake, Jr. |
| Thomas Drake | 20222 | b. 08 Oct 1735 | Virginia | R-M269 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 28 | 16 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 20222 | Thomas Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Osborne L. Drake | 26298 | 1830-1879 | VA to Nebraska City, NE | R-M269 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 28 | 16 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 26298 | Osborne L. Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Archibald Drake | 407849 | 1776-1853 | VA to Ohio | RM269 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 28 | 16 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 38 | 39 | 13 | 12 | 407849 | Archibald Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Archibald Drake | 99633 | b. 1776 | Virginia | R-M269 |
13 |
23 | 14 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 28 | 16 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 20 | 30 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 38 | 39 | 13 | 12 | 99633 | Archibald Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Epaphroditus Drake | 2911 | b. 1770 | Virginia | R-P295 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 13 | 12 | 29 | 16 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 38 | 39 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 21 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 08 | 12 | 23 | 21 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 2911 | Epaphroditus Drake |
|
NEW ENGLAND - R1b1 |
The 25/25 match between James Drake (Kit# 4742) and Daniel Drake (Kit# 4948) indicates that these two donors have a 84.92% chance of sharing a common ancestor within the past eight generations (or about 200 years). After the upgrade, we find that John Drake (11672) is a 37/37 match with James Drake (4742) indicating that these two donors have a 97.28% chance of sharing a common ancestor within the past eight generations. Philander Drake (29919) and John Drake (11672) are 12/12 matches with each other and both are within 1 mutation of the other three tests (on 12 makers) and thus are likely related, but we need to see some higher resolutions to these as well. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| James Drake | 4742 | b. 1801 | Massachusetts | R-M269 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 16 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 28 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 32 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 18 | 11 | 11 | 18 | 23 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 18 | 36 | 37 | 12 | 12 | 08 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 08 | 13 | 21 | 20 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 12 | 4742 | James Drake |
| Abijah Drake | 4948 | 14 Jan 1789 | Brookline, Windham, VT | R-M269 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 16 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 28 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 32 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 18 | 4948 | Abijah Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abijah Drake | 80815 | c. 1735-1819 |
MA to VT |
R-M269 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 16 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 28 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 32 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 18 | 11 | 11 | 18 | 23 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 18 | 36 | 37 | 12 | 12 | 08 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 08 | 13 | 21 | 20 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 12 | 80815 | Abijah Drake |
| John Drake | 11672 | b. 1846 | Massachusetts | R-M269 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 16 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 28 | 11672 | John Drake | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Philander N. Drake | 29919 | 23 Feb 1872 | Otsega Co. NY | R-M269 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 16 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 28 | 29919 | Philander N. Drake | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ISLE OF WIGHT CO., VA - R1b1 | Using
Nathaniel M. Drake (10785) as the base kit for this group, we find that
both Richard Drake (4926) and Simon Drake (5051) are within one mutation
on the 37 marker results. We would estimate that these three
donors have a 97.21% chance of sharing a common ancestor within the past
12 generations (or back to the time period when Richard Drake
lived). Hezekiah Drake's donor (8781) is two mutations distance
from the Nathaniel M. Drake donor, resulting in a 91.03% probability of
a common ancestor within twelve generations. This may be a recent
mutation that we need to investigate. EKA John Drake (4743) is a
12/12 match with Nathaniel Drake and their 12 generation probability is
70.69%. According to my records, EKA Simon Drake (1795) is
actually a female line and not relevant for our project. The close
relationship on 12 markers (2 mutations) is intriguing though.
Donors for EKA Thomas Drake (Kits 5715, 4145 and 4113) are 11/12 matches with Kit #s25372 and 125820. There is a 32.64% chance that all five donors share a common ancestor within the past 12 generations. The same probability exists for a common ancestor with EKA Nathaniel L. Drake (10785), however, that relationship begins to fall apart with the 25 marker test results (3 mutation distance). We should upgrade Kit #s 25372 and 4113 to 37 markers for a better comparison. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Elias Franklin Drake | 268854 | 1813-1887 | R-M269 | 13 | 23 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 18 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 36 | 38 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 11 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 23 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 09 | 12 | 21 | 20 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 268854 | Elias Franklin Drake | |
| John Thomas Drake | 311235 |
b.1760 d. 1799 |
Ireland to SC | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 15 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 24 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 17 | 36 | 37 | 13 | 12 | 311235 | John Thomas Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hezekiah Drake | 8781 | b. 1780-1790 | Lincoln Co., NC | R-P25 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 28 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 11 | 10 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 37 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 08 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 8781 | Hezekiah Drake |
| Nathaniel M. Drake | 10785 | 1798-1876 | Lincoln Co., NC | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 11 | 10 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 37 | 12 | 12 | 10785 | Nathaniel M. Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Richard Drake | 4926 | c.1609-1658 | England to VA | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 11 | 10 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 17 | 34 | 37 | 12 | 12 | 4926 | Richard Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Richard Drake | 332900 | c. 1610 | England to VA | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 11 | 10 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 17 | 34 | 37 | 12 | 12 | 332900 | Richard Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Simon Drake | 5051 | 1795 | Wake Co., NC | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 11 | 10 | 19 | 19 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 37 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 08 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 5051 | Simon Drake |
| Simon Drake | 2936 | 1795 | Wake Co., NC | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 30 | 2936 | Simon Drake | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trustam Drake | 62158 | b. c. 1740 | NC or VA | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 16 | 16 | 17 | 11 | 10 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 38 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 08 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 62158 | Trustam Drake |
| John Fulton Drake | 125820 | b. c. 1750 | PA | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 11 | 10 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 35 | 38 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 6 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 08 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 125820 | John Fulton Drake |
| Thomas Drake | 25372 | 1650-1727 | Somerset, UK to IOW, VA | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 11 | 10 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 37 | 12 | 12 | 25372 | Thomas Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| John A. Drake | 259381 | 1655-1741 | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 30 | 17 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 17 | 10 | 10 | 19 | 23 | 116 | 15 | 18 | 17 | 37 | 40 | 12 | 13 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 11 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 23 | 16 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 08 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 13 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 259381 | John A. Drake | |
| Hezekiah Drake | 127455 | b.1780-1790 | Lincoln Co., NC | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 |
29 |
127455 | Hezekiah Drake | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| John Drake | 4743 | d. 1729 | Bertie Co., NC | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 4743 | John Drake | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Thomas Drake | 5715 | b. 1675 | Isle of Wight, VA | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 5715 | Thomas Drake | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Thomas Drake | 4145 | b. 1675 | Isle of Wight, VA | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 4145 | Thomas Drake | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Thomas Drake | 4113 | b. 1675 | Isle of Wight, VA | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 17 | 09 | 09 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 4113 | Thomas Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NEAR MATCHES - R1b1 |
These near matches were so close on the 12 marker test but fell apart on the higher resolutions and do not likely share common ancestors with anyone in our database. Thomas Drake (6766) is a close match, 11/12, with Thomas Drake (25372) of the IOW Drakes but we need to see an upgrade to substantiate that. After the upgrade, Thomas Drake (6766) has been moved to Canada. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unknown | 48773 | - | - | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 09 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 19 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 26 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 48733 | Unknown | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| James Samuel Drake | 165970 | b: Bef. 1862 | Of London England | R-M269 | 13 | 25 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 18 | 09 | 09 | 11 | 11 | 26 | 14 | 20 | 28 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 22 | 15 | 15 | 19 | 18 | 35 | 38 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 14 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 08 | 12 | 25 | 21 | 14 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 165970 | James Samuel Drake |
| Robert Drake | 6083 | 1775-1840 | VA to Zanesville, OH | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 18 | 09 | 09 | 11 | 11 | 26 | 14 | 20 | 28 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 9 | 22 | 15 | 15 | 18 | 18 | 35 | 38 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 08 | 12 | 25 | 22 | 14 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 6083 | Robert Drake |
| Francis Drake | 96092 | 1739-1828 | R-U106 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 29 | 16 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 26 | 14 | 19 | 29 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 18 | 12 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 15 | 16 | 18 | 18 | 35 | 37 | 11 | 12 | 96092 | Francis Drake | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| James (John) Drake | 46373 | b. abt 1740 | Piscataway, NJ (?) | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 18 | 08 | 09 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 12 | 13 | 15 | 17 | 11 | 12 | 19 | 22 | 15 | 15 | 18 | 18 | 36 | 37 | 12 | 12 | 46373 | James (John) Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CANADA/ENGLAND - R1b1 |
All three of these donors have a 99% of sharing a common ancestor within the past twelve generations. Kits 119427 and 30703 (the two Williams) have 99% chance in eight generations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| William Jehiel Drake |
119427 |
abt 1777 to abt 1844 | Aldorough, Ontario, Canada | R-M269 |
13 |
24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 18 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 24 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 13 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 10 | 10 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 17 | 35 | 38 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 08 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 |
119427 |
William Jehiel Drake |
| Francis Drake | 282551 | 1755-1836 | NY to Canada | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 18 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 24 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 13 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 10 | 10 | 19 | 24 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 17 | 35 | 39 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 08 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 282551 | Unknown |
| John Drake | 247536 | 1797 to 1853 | Virginia | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 18 | 09 | 09 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 31 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 11 | 12 | 19 | 24 | 16 | 15 | 19 | 16 | 37 | 38 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 15 | 08 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 247536 | John Drake |
| Thomas Drake | 6766 | d. 1839 | Stoney Creek, MI | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 18 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 24 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 13 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 10 | 10 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 17 | 35 | 38 | 11 | 12 | 6766 | Thomas Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Enoch Drake | 243716 | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 18 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 24 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 10 | 10 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 35 | 38 | 11 | 12 | 243716 | Enoch Drake | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 30703 | b. c. 1771 | England | R-M269 | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 18 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 24 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 13 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 10 | 10 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 17 | 35 | 38 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 16 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 08 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 08 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 30703 | William Drake | |
| UNRETURNED TEST KITS |
These recently ordered kits have not been returned to the lab. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* These tests was processed by DNA Heritage which does not use the markers shown with dashes in the results columns. Also marker GATA H4 is labeled as TAGA H4 by DNA Heritage and will always be one mutation higher than the value calculated by FTDNA. This donor's TAGA H4 value was 12 which translates to 11 for our purposes on marker GATA H4.
RETURN TO DNA SURNAMES PROJECTS
You are visitor number
since 16 December 2004.