(1)
My Uncle Nes said Judge Baird told him that he, Judge
Baird, had two ancestors (a Baird and a Barnett) in the Siege of
??. He, Uncle Nes, couldn't recall what siege, and when I
suggested "the Siege of Londonderry" he said
perhaps that was the one, but it seemed to him it was in
Scotland. This was related to me by Uncle Nes when he was along
in years and his memory was poor. As this Siege of Londonderry
is the only famous siege, and as the family were living there at
the time, I feel I am not mistaken in concluding that this is
the siege to which Judge Baird referred.
(2)
This quotation is from "Striking Events in Irish
History", by Dowsett, and I have used that work as my authority
for this summary of the Siege of Londonderry.)
(3) This
quotation is from Ogilvie’s "The Presbyterian Churches", and I
have used that work freely in this brief outline of the history
of the Presbyterian Church in Ireland
(4)
"Pennsylvania Genealogies", by Egle, can be found in most
of the large libraries of the country. It contains many pages of
Barnett data, following the line of John born 1700. It gives the
dates of birth of Robert as 1701, James 1703, and John 1705, but
the dates as shown above have come to me from other sources. And
as it appears from the will that Robert and James received a
smaller share of their father’s estate than did John, I
concluded that the latter was the eldest and that the dates as
they came to me from the other sources must be correct.)
(5)
The "Pennsylvania Genealogies" record shows that John
born 1700 had a son Joseph born in Ireland in 1726 or
1728. As this record shows the family emigrated to America prior
to 1730, and as the quotation from the Ogilvie work (p. 3) says
that "from 1729 onwards a steady stream of immigrants began to
flow", I conclude that these families came in 1729.
(6) In
all my research work I have never located one known to be
descended from this William.
(7) Mrs. Hannah Virginia Cahill of San Antonio, Texas (see Hannah Cahill) granddaughter of Hannah Barnet, who was taken captive by Indians, has worked with me on this genealogy hunt for many years and has been my inspiration throughout.
(8) See
footnote #5
(9) See
footnote #5
(10)
The reservations attending this data as given on pages 4 and 5 also apply
(11)
Another
and
final paragraph of this paper is given on page 24
(12)
This brief outline of the Braddock Campaign and the
subsequent expedition against the fort is taken from "Highlights
in History', by Mansfield, and "History of Braddock's
Expedition", by Sargent. The Judge‑Baird data is inaccurate in
that it states that in the second expedition the fort was
captured and the French garrison taken. The facts are as stated
at the bottom of this page.
(13)
This is followed by a reference to the account of the
Paint Creek Expedition mentioned above. It should be stated here
that if Alexander did serve with Boone in 1778, that was before
and not after any service he may have seen under General Gates,
for the latter did not succeed to the command until December,
1780.
(14) History of
Braddock's Expedition, by Sargent.
(15) Augusta
County, Virginia Records, by Chalkey.
(16) This deed is in
file 32 of the Ohio County Circuit Clerk's offices.
(17) Ohio County in
the Olden Days, by Harrison Taylor.
(18)
Taken from one of a series of articles running in the
Hartford Herald during the latter part of 1907, contributed by
John H. McHenry, Jr., as related to him by Stephen Stateler, an
Ohio County pioneer (1770‑1856). This
Stephen Stateler account is given more briefly in Collins
history of Kentucky.
(19)
It should be borne in mind that all the reservations
attendant upon this data where previously given are also
applicable here.
(20) Ohio County, organized in 1798, was a part of Hardin County, Ky. 1798‑1792
(Kentucky became a
separate state in 1792)
Nelson County, Va. 1792-1784
Jefferson County, Va. 1792-1784
Kentucky
County, Va. 1780-1776
(21)
See page 16 for more
pertaining to this
(22)
So referred to in Collins History of Kentucky and in
county records.
(23) Records
in the Hardin County Clerk's office show that one Christopher
Jackson had Col. Alexander haled before court for charging "high
blooded fees for official services" as Justice of the Peace.
There are many records of litigation between said Jackson and
the Barnetts, and apparently Jackson was a contentious sort of
person. I do not believe the charge against Col. Alexander
was justified, for it is not like the Barnetts to take unfair
advantage of others. In fact, the reverse is usually true.