C:\DOCUME~1\bill\Desktop\GOVTGU~1.HTM VARIANCES AND ZONING CONTROLS

Landowners and buyers of land within the Towns and Village located within the watershed of Skaneateles Lake frequently apply for variances, also known as waivers, from the strict requirements of the relevant zoning law. Such applications are heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals which is appointed by the Town or Village Board.

Such variances are divided into two categories - use variances and area variances.

A use variance is one which permits a use of land that is prohibited by the zoning regulations. A variance which permits a multiple dwelling in a district limited to single-family homes is a use vanance.

An area variance does not involve use but is one which permits the bulk of the lot or the structure placed on the lot to vary or differ from the zoning regulations. A variance to permit the construction of a home on a lot that is smaller than required by the zoning regulations is an area variance.

Most applications submitted to Zoning Boards of Appeal are for area variances and this note will focus on the requirements that must be observed by the Zoning Board of Appeals before taking final action on such an application: Before taking final action, the Board of Appeals is required to publish a notice of a public hearing in a newspaper of general circulation at least five days before such hearing which must be open to anyone who wishes to speak in favor or against the application.

In making its determination, the Board of Appeals is mandated to take into consideration the benefit to the applicant if the variance is granted, as weighed against the detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant. In making such determination the Board shall also consider:

(1) whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of the area variance;

(2) whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance;

(3) whether the requested area variance is substantial;

(4) whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district; and

(5) whether the alleged difficulty was self-created; which consideration shall be relevant to the decision of the Board of Appeals, but shall not necessarily preclude the granting of the area variance.
In addition to considering the above criteria, the Board of Appeals is also authorized to impose conditions under the following statutory language:

Imposition of conditions. The Board of Appeals shall, in the granting of both use variances and area variances, have the authority to impose such reasonable conditions and restrictions as are directly related to and incidental to the proposed use of the property. Such conditions shall be consistent with the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance or local law, and shall be imposed for the purpose of minimizing any adverse impact such variance may have on the neighborhood or community.

The Zoning Board of Appeals is also required to consider the environmental impact of each application if the Board will make the final determination on the application.

Under prior law, the Board of Appeals used the test of whether the applicant faced "practical difficulties" in the use of their property without the granting of the variance unless the zoning regulations imposed a more stringent standard.

Under amendments to the New York State Town and Village Law all Boards of Appeal are required to comply and consider the above criteria before talcing final action on an application for an area variance.