Those individuals with an asterisks behind their names have a photo of
themselves on their page.
INDEX OF INDIVIDUALS
FAMILY TREE WHITE
FAMILY TREE BROOKE
|| see FAMILY TREE
|Born: 1608 England
|Married: 1632-1634 Ipswich, England
|Died: 06/Jun/1662 New Haven, CT
||Will of William Potter
His will was made May 19, 1662, and is as follows:
"William Potter disposes of his estate of outward things as followeth. After
all Debts discharged my will is that my wife should have her living out of
the farms till my sonne Nathanll, come to ye age of 21 years, then se sd.
Nathaniell is to possess ye sd. farms and all yt is upon it, if my wife
continue a widdow my will is yt my Sonne Nathanll allow her a comfortable
Living out of the same and if shee see cause to Dwell elsewhere my will is
yt my sonne Nathaniell allow her 12th a yeare.
It: my will is yt my sonne Joseph should have 30th paid him within yt term
of six years after ye date hereof.
it; my will is yt my daughter Hope and my daughter Rebeckah shall have 20th
apiece payd ym when their mother sees good to pay it them. My will is that
those Legasyses be payd out of the farms before it comes into my sonne
19. 3. 62.
Witnesses. William Peck. Richard Miles."
Inventory filed Aug 1, 1662. Amt 190 pounds 4 shilling 0 pence.
1. Joseph Potter b. 1635 England
2. Mary Potter
3. Sarah Potter
4. Hope Potter
5. Rebecca Potter b. 1643
6. Nathaniel Potter
Source: Joy Bridenstine" firstname.lastname@example.org
Information on William Potter and his family taken from The New Haven
Potters. It states that Hannah Potter Beecher was the mother of William and his
brother, John. Hannah's first husband died in England, there is where she
married her second husband, thought to be John Beecher. She appears in New Haven
as a widow. Hannah died in 1659.
It is thought William, his wife and first son, along with his mother and brother
came to this country on the Abigail from London in 1635. He first settled in
Watertown, Mass prior to moving to New Haven where he is first mentioned in the
town meeting with his brother in 1639.
According to Court of Magistrates, New Haven Jurisdiction, 26 May 1662, William
was charged, tried and hung for committing the sin of bestiality with sundries
creatures. It was stated the animals were hung with him.
Joseph, b. in England, in 1635; m. Phebe----
Mary, bapt. In New Haven, Aug 22, 1641; m. about 1657, Joseph Mansfield
Sarah, bapt. Aug. 22, 1641, but was not a twin with Mary. She m. 1st Lt. Robert
Foote of Branford, CT; 2d Aaron Blakesley.
Hope, bapt. Oct 3, 1641; m. Feb. 3, 1663 Daniel Robinson. Removed to New Jersey.
Rebecca, bapt. 1643; m. Nov. 27, 1667, Thomas Adams. Removed to Crosswicks, NJ
Nathaniel, bapt. Dec. 12, 1644; m. April 1, 1675 Elizabeth Howes.
Of these children Mary and Sarah are not named in their father's will, but Sarah
was living Aug. 23, 1706, when "Sarah Blakesley, alias Foote, alias Potter
daughter of William Potter," acknowledges on p. 130, vol. V., New Haven Land
Records, the receipt of her full share in her father's estate.
The younger children moved from New Haven shortly after their father's death.
None of the known grandchildren were named either William or Frances.
William Potter's Crime
In 1662, William Potter, was called to testify to the charges of capital crimes
with "sundrie animals" brought by his wife and son. In 1666, his daughter,
Rebecca Potter, was found guilty of "indiscretions" with John Thorpe.
At a Court of Magistrates, held at Newhaven for the Jurisdiction, the 26th of
Present, the Government, Deputy Governor, Mr. Fen, Mr. Treat, Mr. Crane,
William Potter was called before the court to answer to what charge or
accusation as they understand from examination is layd against him, viz: that he
hath committed the sin of bestiality with sundrie creatures.
The Governor told him, that first he must mind him of his carriage before the
magistrate: when he was examined, that when you heard what your wife & son
testified to your face, yet you was not affected as you should have beene,
whether true or false, but stood in a stupid way, making deniall of what was
testified that they could not fasten it as a charge against him, yet told him
that the puidence of God was soe strange in it, (his neare relations thus
charging of him.) that if he was guilty God would bring it forth to light, & soe,
with as much solemnes as they could, left it with him & alsoe with Mr. Gilbert
to gainne any further discovery as he could; and now it seemes since, (it may be
by some better dealing with him in the business, & gods jealousie against him.)
God hath brought it forth out of his owne mouth; and seeing the church hath done
their duty, which they well approved of, they as ministere of justice call him
to account, to speake the truth in the case, & deale plainely, as standing
before the great God of heaven & earth, his judge & theirs, & to make
acknowledgment of the facts, how, when, & with what creatures.
He answered that first when we was before the magistrates he answered with a
distinction, & thought their testimony could not take away his life, but being
before the church & helped over something that stucke with him, he did confesse
& judge himself worthy to be cut off from among men & to be given over to be
And now he confessed more paticularly, the first time he said was in old
England, at prentise, when he was about eleven yeare old, & after when he came
to New England these temptations followed him, though sometimes they left him
some yeares together, & then he thought God did worke upon his soule, & the
temptation left him a great while, but after he coming to live at Mr. Gilberts
farme it returned again, & he acted with a cow which is now gone, & after coming
to his owne farme his lust followed him, though he thought he should have got
power against it, &
When the man was hanged for the same act he was much started, but after still
the temptation went on, & it strooke a dampe upon his spirit that it was not
right with him, & there he acted first with a bitch, which he hanged thinking he
should be free from the temptation when she was gone, but it still pursued him,
& he acted this wickedness with two sowes, one of which was that of which his
son testified, there is alsoe a yeareling heifer, a two yeare old, and a cow
that he had beene vilely naught withall this spring, alsoe three sheepe, of
which he said he told his wife which there were; these was all he said, only his
attempting with his old mare which is now dead; & then confessed that he had
gone far from God, but prayed, & desired their prayers, that he might not goe
further from him and desired to have what meanes might be affoarded for his
everlasting good, acknowledging the Lord to be righteous whatever became of him.
He was asked with what he covered these wicked courses: He answered that he went
on against the checkes of his conscience, & did not consider the compasse of is
sin, he had some dislikes of it but was overcome still, & when he son discovered
him, he had noe heart to speake to him, but was affected with teares, that he,
being an old man, should be a foole in his latter end.
He was minded of his sin before the magistrates, that he should speake soe
against his knowne light, & of his excusing it to his wife when she told him of
He said he thought his excusing of it to her was a forerunner of these sins
Much was said by him by way of acknowledgment of his evill, but in a confused
way, as that sometimes he was filled with horror & that his sin lay upon him
night & day, & that he was such sins the nature of them did harden his heart, &
that he was filled with shame & confusion for the dishonor that he had done to
God & that he had caused the name of God to be blasphemed among the heathen.
He was told that such sins was judiciary sins, according to Rom. 1, 24, when men
like not to retaine God in their knowledge, they are just judgments of God upon
such under such light as he hath lived under, & that he should come to such a
degree of sinning & to such an age ws a thing to admiration & astonishment of
all that heares him.
He said he thinkes now all he did was to be seene of men, though sometimes he
had other thoughts, yet now he hath nothing but his sin left upon him & is
discouraged, & his sins affright him from God, though sometimes some hopes may
be in him.
He was asked how he was educated: He answered, well, & was taught to reade.
He was then seriously advised & warned to take in the agravations of his sin,
for he had beene a continuall liver in this sin from his childhood, & that he
had beene exceedingly hardened in it, that he should goe on in it after he saw
others put to death for the same acts & such like, & was told that his sins was
wonderfull, therefore was wished to be serious about repentance, & to take heed
he did not word it out to the last.
He was further questioned, that seeing he had acknowledged more then was charged
against him, whether he had not defiled himselfe with any woman besides his
He answered noe, neither with woman, mayd nor child, that was certaine.
The Court haveing considered the case p'ceeded to sentence, & first read the law
to him, & then the Governor asked him if he had anything to say why the court
should not p'ceede to judge him according to the law.
He answered noe, but his great matter was betweene God & his soule, to desire
him to give him repentance.
The Governor then declared, that seeing it is soe, they could doe noe otherwise,
and he therefore in the name of the court did declare to William Potter that the
law read was the sentence of the court, to be executed upon him, viz: that he be
hanged on the gallowes till he be dead, & then cut downe & buried, & the
creatures with whome he hath thus sinfully acted to be put to death before is
He answered that he had in himselfe the sentence of death before For the time of
his execution, it was left to the magistrates of Newhaven with the advise of the
*Mather, who gave an account of this case, mag. B. vi. Cap. v Ap. iii states he
was executed on the 6th of June
Source: Records of the Jurisdiction of New Haven.